Michael49

Wow, very nice. I'm curious about the PP here. Is this a multi-image pano used to reduce DOF?

Post new message ... They look pretty good. There is also some FF shots from the 5d2 on their site as well - doesn't look like it will be usable on FF - no surprise there.

They look pretty good. There is also some FF shots from the 5d2 on their site as well - doesn't look like it will be usable on FF - no surprise there.

They look pretty good. There are also some FF shots from the 5d2 on their site as well - doesn't look like it will be usable on FF - no surprise there.

My 6D has this function, guess that means its a Pro camera!. :D

I use the Sigma 50 1.4 on my 6D and its a great lens.....Also, I would consider the 40mm f/2.8 pancake  Its crazy lightweight, inexpensive and quite sharp.....

More photos with this combo please - how about a portrait or two. :)

I just paid $15 for this STK battery for my 6D and it works like a charm.http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00AVBDGHM/ref=pe_175190_21431760_M3T1_ST1_dp_1

Its revolutionary because its like having FF mirrorles for just a tad bit less than the $7000 Leica digital M!!!! - or the $2800 single FL Sony RX1!!!!To me, that is revolutionary.

The question is how much better though.If this "adapter" is as good as Metabones claims it will be a game changer.I could put my Zeiss C/Y 50 1.7, C/Y 28 2.8 and 85 2.8 on a NEX and they will act...

Love mine so far, very good dynamic range.....

Sorry, I couldn't disagree more.  Film gives a very different look from digital.....Portra 160, Canon 50 1.8 II....Sony NEX 5N...Portra 160... Sony NEX 5N.... Portra 160, Canon 50 1.8 II....

Yea for a film shot winning!! (especially on a website called dpreview :) )

What film was this, by the way?

Just think how you would feel if this were your husband / wife that ended up on the cover? Publishing this story is journalism, publishing this photo (especially with the headline they chose) is...

It amazes me how many people say that IS is useful for non-static subjects - way to prove them wrong! Beautiful shot.

It amazes me how many people say that IS is useless for non-static subjects - way to prove them wrong! Beautiful shot.

Beautiful images.  As a casual visitor to this forum I was beginning to think that there were no real photographers here.

When I shoot full body portraits I'm actually not usually trying to blow out the background, but rather I am want my subject to "pop" out of of the background and this, again, is much more easily...

What do I gain?......beach bokeh!!! :)