Tom Goodman

I'm shocked to learn Apple wasn't invited to this party.

Another bogeyman posing as an argument from the editorial department of DPR. An example of an alteration of significance would be Edward Curtis' removal of an alarm clock from an interior view of...

I will alert my mortgage broker immediately.

Shame on you, too, DPR. Tossing such soft lobs. Expecting such negative reaction? When the subject was first broached months ago the reaction was quick, plentiful and negative. The confirmation...

Talk about disingenuous, "Adobe has said it will no longer be developing its Creative Suite range of software, leaving its subscription and cloud-based Creative Cloud as the only way of accessing...

Suggestion to DPR: Post the pictures with no commentary or explanation. Let them stand on their own merit. No mention of who, what, where, when or how.

Adobe is offering a single app one year subscription for $9.99 if renewed by July 31, 2013. They are taking their marketing cues from the broadband companies and offering sweet one year deals. ...

You are wrong on every count. Indeed, cellphone camera zealots like yourself are the ones who believe equipment is all. Throwing around phrases like "pixel peeper" reveals your true orientation. ...

Not convinced.

I'd like to amend the now famous maxim that "the best camera you own is the one you have with you" to read "the best camera...except those built into cellphones."

I frequently experiment with subjects and techniques; however, I don't subject the public to every one of them.

Photographers & dealers create editions for several reasons. These include limiting the number of prints in order to artificially limit supply & also increasing demand not only for a particular...

They are still crappy shots.

Ethically speaking? Which code is this? It may be a journalist's professional responsibility to remain a dispassionate observer but no code exists that exempts humanity. There may be a code that...

How flattering to the happy couples!

Thanks to all.

I am becoming educated here.  I am curious why my D700 has a native resolution and earlier points-and-shoots had them, too, but the Sony does not list one in its spec sheet.  Please educate me...

I would assume native resolution matters insofar as it affects final output no matter how you set your Camera RAW ppi.  It your camera's native resolution is 180 ppi and you work with a default...

Can anyone tell me the native resolution in ppi of the Sony RX100?

I'd ask for a refund if I were the couple in question.