It's odd that the MX-1 has better high-ISO image quality.
Edwaste: In other photos I've seen of the A58, the lens mount is black. I hope that's not made of plastic.
My interest just went from about 90% to down to 0. The plastic lens mount may be fine, but I think I'll wait and let someone else try it first and see how it holds up.
peevee1: The weight in your spec sheet is incorrect - it should be 492g (with battery), not 429.
Also, the specification table is titled "Sony Alpha NEX-3N specifications". Copy and paste error, I guess.
joepix: Hmm.. how many stops could be gained if they made one of these to convert medium format lenses to Micro 4/3s or even to use medium format on full frame? I'd love to use my old Hassy lenses again.
> the 0.71 number in this case comes from the size of the format they are starting with, nothign else.
.71 is not arbitrary, it's one divided by the square root of two.
Nerdlinger: K-30...best bang for the buck.....
Same here, K-30. Cheapest 100% pentaprism on the market, and lots of prime lenses.
Why do all the product pictures have huge amounts of chroma noise?
z9z9z9z9: Looking at the mode dial, it looks like this camera does NOT have AP or SP, just program, manual, and a bunch of scene modes.
> Well what do you want with a 1/2,33" Sensor?
I didn't say I wanted AP, I said it doesn't seem to have it as indicated in the specifications. I hope jumping to conclusions isn't the only exercise you get.
Looking at the mode dial, it looks like this camera does NOT have AP or SP, just program, manual, and a bunch of scene modes.
> This is a new golden age of photography
Yes, it sure is! Even the *worse* camera on the market is far beyond what we had 10 years ago. Lenses not so much, but still nothing to complain about.
The most important thing I got from this article, and my only real reason for reading it: the image quality on the K-30 is going to be excellent!
MiLei: I did not see its crop factor.
Sensor is APS but 1.2 or 1.5 or what. I know it now, but it should have in the preview, shouldn't it?
It's actually closer to 1.55 for the D3200, since the sensor is somewhat smaller than the nominal dimensions of 24x16mm from which the 1.5 figure is derived.
z9z9z9z9: I think anyone who has looked at the comparative dimensions of the Nikon and Sony sensors (23.2x15.4mm vs. 23.5x15.6mm) realises that this is not the same sensor. You can't "tweek" photosite pitch -- it's a static design parameter.
If you re-read my post you will notice that I'm not making any claims about who is (or is not) manufacturing the sensor used in the D3200. I am simply stating that it is *not* the same sensor used in the Sony A77 or NEX-7.
I think anyone who has looked at the comparative dimensions of the Nikon and Sony sensors (23.2x15.4mm vs. 23.5x15.6mm) realises that this is not the same sensor. You can't "tweek" photosite pitch -- it's a static design parameter.
Impressive results at high ISO raw. The Nikon sensor has less chroma noise than the Sony sensor in both the A77 and the NEX-7. Nikon's mystery sensor is definitely in the game.
keekimaru: Link : http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B007VGGFZU/tipfla-20
Don’t let the D3200’s compact size and price fool you—packed inside this easy to use HD-SLR is serious Nikon power: a 24.2 MP DX-format CMOS sensor that excels in any light, EXPEED 3 image-processing for fast operation and creative in-camera effects, Full HD (1080p) movie recording, in-camera tutorials and much more. What does this mean for you? Simply stunning photos and videos in any setting. And now, with Nikon’s optional Wireless Mobile Adapter, you can share those masterpieces instantly with your Smartphone or tablet easily!
More Detail : http://camera.babybi.com/detail.php?id_detail=16
Both the Sony sensor the the Nikon sensor have identical vertical resolution, but the Nikon sensor is slightly smaller (23.2x15.4mm, vs. 23.5x15.6mm for the Sony), so the photosite pitch is by necessity smaller as well. So this is probably *not* the same sensor used in the A77.
I can't help but noticing: 1920 x 3 = 5760. I doubt this is a coincidence.