PIX 2015
Nathebeach

Nathebeach

Joined on Jan 18, 2012

Comments

Total: 92, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

I took my old film camera to a Galaxy game (sorry Seattle) and they would not let me bring my "pro" camera because it was too big.

Got me thinking what if I snuck a mono pod in. SECURITY!
Why not create a selfie stick disguised as a walker's cane, that doubles as a mono pod? Could even fill it with the alcoholic Bev of choice. Now THAT's original. Alcohol may effect image quality a bit.

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2015 at 15:06 UTC as 76th comment

Artist Creates Real Friend by Asking Someone to take picture for her, and they start a conversation...

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2015 at 14:44 UTC as 78th comment
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1252 comments in total)
In reply to:

MustyMarie: The Exposure Latitude test, which I guess tells us some things, but it really 'smacks' of how well 'a terrifically POORLY exposure can be processed - to death' when a 'decent' photographer would have taken a second MUCH better exposed shot or a 'better' photographer would have taken a MUCH better FIRST shot.

If you go look at High ISO exposures, the NX-1 behaves very nicely, which is what a 'decent' photographer would be using NOT +6 ev !!

Maybe fun to do test, but IMO very pathetic for anyone to actually USE this type of technique, at least once you know how lousy it works (for most cams!!!) !!

I think Musty was joking. I hope so anyway, especially the part about getting a second chance when sometimes you just are not that lucky.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 19:48 UTC
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1252 comments in total)
In reply to:

MustyMarie: The Exposure Latitude test, which I guess tells us some things, but it really 'smacks' of how well 'a terrifically POORLY exposure can be processed - to death' when a 'decent' photographer would have taken a second MUCH better exposed shot or a 'better' photographer would have taken a MUCH better FIRST shot.

If you go look at High ISO exposures, the NX-1 behaves very nicely, which is what a 'decent' photographer would be using NOT +6 ev !!

Maybe fun to do test, but IMO very pathetic for anyone to actually USE this type of technique, at least once you know how lousy it works (for most cams!!!) !!

Also reporters subjects do not always wait for good light. Sometimes you take what you can get.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 13:28 UTC
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1252 comments in total)
In reply to:

tom1234567: If you don't buy the S/lens no point in buying the camera.
the other lens which are not S/ don't get good reviews.

I have not read a good review on any of the cheaper Lens for the NX1
in other words there CRAP

I would buy the camera but the S/lens are far to expensive,
have to wait 6mths until the price drops or
Pentax brings out something better than K3

It is mirrorless. What about third party glass?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 13:25 UTC
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1252 comments in total)
In reply to:

shademaster: for all the "arm-chair" pros out there complaining about lack of glass, I imagine the *real* pros are very happy with: i) fast standard zoom, ii) fast tele zoom, iii) fast portrait lens for 95% of their work. FWIW, as an amateur, the 30mm + 45mm + 85mm makes a great arsenal. I don't know what you "we need more glass…. it's all about the system" people want, really.

Those same people go to exhibits and say "your camera takes nice photos." (from the comic "What the Duck")

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2015 at 13:23 UTC
On P1010273 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (12 comments in total)
In reply to:

SomethingBeautiful: Not one thing is sharp in this picture.

Any time you shoot through that much atmosphere, that is to be expected.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 04:53 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (12 comments in total)
In reply to:

SomethingBeautiful: Not one thing is sharp in this picture.

Any time you shoot through that much atmosphere, that is to be expected.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 04:53 UTC

Honey, did you remember to feed the trolls?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 14:46 UTC as 44th comment
On Canon PowerShot S120 real-world samples (UPDATED) article (69 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tonkotsu Ramen: How do you not take even one low light shot in all of those samples?

The picture of the sky in low light doesn't count.. because it's a picture of the lit sky..

What's going on over at dpr?

Barny,
I also thank you for your explanation.
I also second other posters: I would like more low light photos; both at high iso and low iso (using tripod). Remember Fuji's X-10 and its superb low light performance? I am always eager for a camera that can approach that level of performance, and if all test photos took similar subjects in similar light, then comparing one camera to another would be more of an apples to apples (Washington apples of course) experience.
Thanks for posting.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 14:28 UTC
On Canon PowerShot S120 real-world samples (UPDATED) article (69 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tonkotsu Ramen: How do you not take even one low light shot in all of those samples?

The picture of the sky in low light doesn't count.. because it's a picture of the lit sky..

What's going on over at dpr?

Hi Barney,
Can you tell me why DPR seems to always gravitate towards bright light shots? I know they were all done in one day, but what about shooting golden hour?

I assume the answer is you intentionally take shots in less than ideal light to push the camera and see what it is capable of doing in less than ideal conditions. Is that a conscience decision? Take the elephant shot for example. Bright light and shadows in one shot?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2013 at 19:53 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2081 comments in total)
In reply to:

rikyxxx: 1380 comments!!!
Olympus products still grab people attention and that's what drives someone mad...

Google the youtube clip of William Shatner on Saturday Night Live. He is at a trekkie convention, and he tells all the trekkies that are idolizing him to go out and "GET A LIFE."
Seeing all of these comments kind of reminds me of that clip. I guess that makes me one of the trekkies. Time for me to get away from my computer and go shoot some more photos.

Here is one version, but it is not the complete one. If I find the full version I will post:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaB_G1WNT70

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2013 at 13:56 UTC
On Pro DSLRs, Pro Photographers article (126 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jun2: Seriously, I don't look at sports photos that much. I watch games or video summary of games, and read the articles. Photos is the last thing I care about the sports.

and yet you are on a photography website.
I don't look at sports photography either, but I appreciate the well shot photos.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2013 at 13:39 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: They should stick with their unique sensor types. That's what sets them apart.

I also don't get why they would target low end consumers with a cheap body when they only sell expensive lenses.

SHood,
I would have to slightly disagree.
That is a little like saying the average consumer does not have parents or grand parents (my 100mm ssc was a hand me down from my Dad), and don't even get me started on the quality glass available on the used market (source of my 50mm and 200mm SSC lenses).

I think a lot of people do not even realize the quality of glass at their disposal. It is a shame if it does not get put to good use. The legacy glass market is big business among micro four thirds users. In fact, I got my Olympus pen camera specifically so that I could use my old lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 22:05 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: They should stick with their unique sensor types. That's what sets them apart.

I also don't get why they would target low end consumers with a cheap body when they only sell expensive lenses.

I own a bunch of Canon SSC lenses, which was the predacessor to the L lenses. On my micro four thirds they are spectacular. Imagine what they could do on a Fuji APS-C sensor?

I think that is one demographich to which this camera will appeal to in a major way. That demographic being the user with some quality old glass that they can now dust off and use to its potential.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2013 at 19:41 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): The problem with many forums today is that they are run and moderated by too many people that are politically correct lunatics that are biased, petty and immature. They like to portray themselves as liberal, fair and openminded but in fact they are the opposite of that. DPreview is guilty of that.

For example....?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 19:48 UTC
In reply to:

Nathebeach: I am curious if and how comments have contributed to improvements in dpreview and even in product manufacturing.

That is my point. Remember the Toyota Echo? That was the result of Toyata doing exhastive research to see what young people want. They did their survey's at schools and rock concerts and the result was the Echo. More retired people bought it than youts. It screwed up Toyota's target demographic (the idea being that young buyers become repeat buyers). BTW it was a good car, just not stylish.
MAYBE more useful info can SOMETIMES be gleaned from comment boards than by conducting expensive market research.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 19:41 UTC

I am curious if and how comments have contributed to improvements in dpreview and even in product manufacturing.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 14:46 UTC as 74th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

jcmarfilph: none of the above..
Those silly ideas of attaching lens to a mediocre camera phone with sensor smaller than a pinhead are worthless.

Also, attaching a lens bigger than a phone itself defeats the purpose of mobility.

I'd rather see more travelzoom or bridge cam with WIFI or 4G capabilities than make my self look like a dork with a slippery brick in one hand and another hand holding the lens.

The RX100 is smaller than many phones. That is why I thought of it; that and its superior image quality. If it is still too thick then think more along the lines of an S95 by Canon.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2013 at 15:00 UTC
In reply to:

jcmarfilph: none of the above..
Those silly ideas of attaching lens to a mediocre camera phone with sensor smaller than a pinhead are worthless.

Also, attaching a lens bigger than a phone itself defeats the purpose of mobility.

I'd rather see more travelzoom or bridge cam with WIFI or 4G capabilities than make my self look like a dork with a slippery brick in one hand and another hand holding the lens.

Maybe instead of converting a smart phone into a camera, the approach should be taken a proven camera and converting to a phone. Imagine the RX100 as a phone. Mmmm.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2013 at 04:12 UTC
Total: 92, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »