This is my favourite pic from the challenge. Love it!
MBradfield: Nice shot.
Congratulations on your win. I think it's a very creative and well executed idea. Love it!
Wildbegonia: I <3 it !
ejw07: luv it
BarnET: Normally i don;t like portraits at 35mm equiv.Since it increases the size of the nose.But in this particular case it actually works rather well with the low-key lighting.
Also in colour which is quiet hard when shooting low-key. Overall a very interesting shot.
I agree about 35mm and portraits usually. My aim wasn't to be flattering so I thought I could get away with it this time. You also get a feeling of closeness to the subject when using a wide focal length up close. I think that helps in this photo. Thanks for commenting.
Thank you for the kind words Derek
Eugene232: nice camera but overpriced.Ricoh GR and Nikon A 2- 3 times cheaper with the same IQ
I agree that it's a bit overpriced. I think the comparison to the GR and A is a little unfair though. Those cameras have been out a while, comparing it to the X100 or X100s is fairer. They also offer less, no hybrid viewfinder, one stop slower lens etc.
Thanks everyone for your wonderful comments and feedback. Much appreciated.
Thanks SamsonRichard. I look forward to seeing your pic.
This lens will be perfect if you're trying to sell a tiny one bedroom flat. It will be transformed into spacious studio apartment at 11mm. 14/15mm is already stupidly wide so 11mm just seems obscene although I have no doubt some gifted photographers will be able to produce stunning photos with it. For most people though the Tamron 15-30mm which is f2.8 and comes with VR at nearly 1/3 the cost will be a much better option. It is an interesting lens from canon though, that's for sure.
Coming from someone who entered into this challenge, I have to say this is a deserved winning picture. Very creative and well executed. Well done.
munro harrap: I wont buy one that has no manual zoom at all, because I want to decide when I change focal length-not have to wait for some icle electric motor to zoom slowly and inaccurately instead (they never stop where you need them to!).
And I do not buy things that have automatic battery-dependant lens caps.
Really, one would think that with the added expense and the battery drain manufacturers would avoid all such like the plague, but then one HAS to have something that goes wrong... to get you back to the shops to buy an "upgrade".
I am sure that you can put a full-frame sensor into a body this size now, with decent lenses, as the Leica's lenses are still to scale, so one fine day very soon Sony will do just that- with all those Contax G lens designs just awaitingits "creation".Would you want zoom lenses? Yes, obviously, and they do not have to be huge either now, as the scaled down zoom on the LX-100 shows us, just f2.8or F4, since big sensors are so good at high ISOs now.
A prime example of you can't please everyone. I won't buy a camera without an evf, perhaps I should go and complain about every camera without one.
According to DPR the manual focus ring can be used as a zoom ring when not in manual focus mode. And on the Panasonic Japan website it says the manual focus ring can be used as a step zoom. Here's the link, you have to google translate.http://panasonic.jp/dc/lx100/operation.html
The automatic lens cap is an optional extra. It comes with a normal pinch lens cap, so I'm not sure you're complaining about here. Personally I'd much rather have the automatic cap rather than mess around with a fiddly lens cap.
And lastly I think a FF compact with a zoom lens is a pipe dream right now. It was an amazing achievement in creating a fast lens for a M43 sensor. A sensor that is four times the size will require a significantly bigger image circle. If you use a slow lens then you lose the advantage of FF.
Jon Schick: OK Panasonic (and Leica)....please make sure the firmware allows me to select my aperture and shutter speed and still keep auto ISO (ie like TAv mode in Pentax). I'd find that really useful.....
Thanks in anticipation,
As would I.