bimbobo

bimbobo

Lives in Denmark Aarhus, Denmark
Joined on Sep 19, 2005

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (765 comments in total)

Suddendly a lot of "negative" comments, it seems a coincidence.

Comparing cameras is a personal judgement. People used to Canon, Sony and so on.. will find difficult to "adjust" and " probably tent to be more skeptical to other cams.

Sorry it's just my opinion but too often people "shoot" at something different and only see the negative sides

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 14:55 UTC as 72nd comment | 1 reply
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)

We are still talking about a pre-production sample and a not published firmware.

When my FZ150 came out and DP Review made the test the first firmware was crap, and the released firmware solved many quality and tech issues.

I hope that the case will be the same with the FZ1000, and when firmware 1.0 or else is released with the "final" camera all things will be even better.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2014 at 13:08 UTC as 25th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)

This is a production camera with 0.3 firmware.

I remember that when I saw the production samples of the FZ150 with firmware 0.2 it was miles away from the one we got for sale and with firmware 1.0.

Let's wait that the real deal comes out with a "official released good firmware" and let's see what it can deliver.

I look forward to it to replace my beloved FZ150

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2014 at 15:22 UTC as 225th comment
On Canon launches PowerShot SX40 HS 35x CMOS superzoom article (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

bimbobo: ..for all asking of RAW, look at the CHDK options.. and stop crying, please.
If I want RAW I would buy a DSLR.

..I cannot judge your photography, but if it's like your style in talking about people, then is below average.
If you were proper, you would respect other people's points of view. I see it's not the case.
Proper photographrers like you should stay in the DSLR forum.. this is a compact camera, rememeber??
Anyway.. I think moderators should ban you, for calling other trash just because you do not agree.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2011 at 13:35 UTC
On Canon launches PowerShot SX40 HS 35x CMOS superzoom article (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

raywes: Nothing has come along in a while to compete with the Sony HX100v, but this changes everything. Along with the Panasonic FZ150, these two cameras will bed the new leaders I predict. And I thought I had my mind made up about purchasing the FZ150 already.

Many people here comment without even checking the specs or without waiting any test, previe, image samples.
The SX40HS has Hot Shoe...
About RAW, many use imany more do not.
About Slow Motion 120fps and GPS and other options, those are just marketing stunts.

I still believe that before saying something, people should see and fell.
We have not a single pic or else.
RAW and maybe burst speed could still give FZ150 some advantages.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2011 at 05:49 UTC
On Canon launches PowerShot SX40 HS 35x CMOS superzoom article (159 comments in total)

..for all asking of RAW, look at the CHDK options.. and stop crying, please.
If I want RAW I would buy a DSLR.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 18:25 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
On Canon launches PowerShot SX40 HS 35x CMOS superzoom article (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

bigdaddave: Cameras like this need RAW to be considered seriously IMO.

I know it's an amateur cam but if you want the best out of the small sensors then we need a RAW mode

..just wait few weeks and CHDK will have a fw with RAW for it..
This cam is my next one..

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 13:21 UTC
In reply to:

ZAnton: Massive noise reduction (and blur) even at ISO 100 to say nothing about ISO 3200. They could just use 6 MP and then upscale photos.

Sorry, but I would like to ask, which picture taken at ISO100 was the one you looked at.
This is not the DSLR forum.. this is a P&S camera with "special" feature and zoom..
I think many at DP, compare a P&S to DSLR quality and keeop bashing whatever camera is not a Nikon or Canon to thousands of dollars.
If you do not like P&S, please do not comment with such "non objective" remarks.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2011 at 14:19 UTC
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8