Les Berkley: Very nice interview, but that man cannot be a photographer. He never mentioned "bokeh" or "Eye-Cue".
Once again, sarcasm is futile. Sigh.
Very nice interview, but that man cannot be a photographer. He never mentioned "bokeh" or "Eye-Cue".
Wow! Fanboi FTW, etc. My pictures of brick walls are really going to improve! Not to mention cats. And my girlfriends looking uncomfortable.
Geez Louise! What's THIS crud doing here? It's about TAKING PICTURES, for bleep's sake. Who does THAT? We need a new camera, so we can find out whether it has front or side focus, banding when shooting light bulbs, dirt on its sensor, and whether or not there will be (shudder) VISIBLE NOISE at ISO 256,000. The "venerable" 7D? VENERABLE? Has it stopped taking pictures all of a sudden?
Steve from TO: Enjoyed watching. Just one issue. Not crazy about Zack thinking it is cool to give tips on how to be sneaky and photograph someone on the sly. Surely, as a street photographer he should be encouraging people to ask permission and actually develop a relationship. You will end up with far more intimate photos and a richer traveling experience. We are, after all, guests in their country and should act with respect.
Asking permission is fine--you get one type of image. Not asking (where legal and safe) gets you another sort of image. Both can be excellent.
Stray Dog: Zack Arias stuff is mediocre. Seems like a nice chap, but the shots he gets are really run of the mill. Outside being a massive Fuji shill I have no idea why anyone would make videos of him shooting.
Side on shots of people smoking are frankly boring and all the messing around pretending to shoot a sky was just useless.
A lot of the advice is just hack street photographer 101. You'll end up with boring shots if you listen to his advice on framing. Using a door as a frame is the most overplayed trick in the book. If you want a human element don't sit in a doorway waiting for a random passerby, go out and find a person that makes you want to shoot them.
Plus making people pose is very contrived. It reminds me of when Winogrand got asked about Davidson and he said it was a, "personal misunderstanding of Diane Arbus' work." It seems that that misunderstanding is still alive today in Zack Arias. Interacting is fine, but making them a caricature is bad.
Sorry, Mr. Dog, but his pictures are a lot better than yours (or mine for that matter).
First of all, get that modern saddle out of there. Next, get some respectable clothing.
Skin tone looks excellent on this one. Natural, no excessive saturation.
So I take it that, in order to get 1/2 stop more light, I have to pay ten thousand dollars? And, for that ten grand I will get jagged blur with outlined highlights? Count me in! Can't I just bump up the ISO? Then I can use the Sigma 50 f1.4, which is sharper and has lovely blur to boot.
Huh? List of equipment? WHO CARES? First three shots are okay, but no more. A slower shutter speed on the first one would've made it a lot better. Taj shot is good, but I wish the foreground had been in focus.
The most important thing to have on location is not gear--it is an advance plan and/or a local guide who really knows the area. Having the proper clothing and medications is a lot more important than what lenses you are carrying.
See http://www.photosbysuzimooremcgregor.com/INDIA.html for some images that actually TAKE you somewhere.
This one's fun. I like both faces.--http://www.artisticlens.comhttp://www.artisticlens.com/blog