I cannot seem to find the general Sigma stand report from the show... ?
Agree 100% with this article. APS-C should offer a size/weight advantage over FF. To take it a step further, Nikon/Canon should be offering APS-C sized "holy trinity" 2.8 lenses.
See this thread:http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54414060
Don't get it. As I understand it, about 90% of Nikon's DSLR sales are DX, yet all the announcements are for FX products. Oh, except Sigma will offer a new 18- whatever zoom lens. Great.
Personally, I'd like an APS-C-only 10mm 2.8 prime.
Nikon and Canon should be using their APS-C lines to bury M4/3. (Not that I have anything against any M4/3 camera, just talking marketing strategy.)
robjons: Interesting project, so so photos. This reminds me of how little progress has been made in air travel. Same tiring travel times for 44 years now. Sure Concorde, but the airlines gave up on it for, I don’t know, greed? Branson, step up!
As I understand it, the airlines concluded it was easier (cheaper) to make money selling first class tickets than to invest in new technology. Money, not the technology itself, killed progress. Maybe it was a sound business decision, but I wish there were a faster alternative sometimes.
Interesting project, so so photos. This reminds me of how little progress has been made in air travel. Same tiring travel times for 44 years now. Sure Concorde, but the airlines gave up on it for, I don’t know, greed? Branson, step up!
white shadow: At the end of the day, it all depends on what kind of person you are. If you are a travel photographer you may appreciate the FZ1000 for the extra reach in one package.
Given the price and similar size, I would rather stay with my DSLR which is more versatile.
“90% of the time shallow DOF is just an excuse for people with no creativity.”
This is nonsense. DOF is one of many creative tools and is a viable approach for many photographic scenarios, and as always, it’s better to take the shot as close to the final concept as possible rather than add it in post. And, imo, it is one element that distinguishes the feature set of a more comprehensively equipped camera.
Agree with w. shadow, stick with DSLR. I don't care about video, but the real killer for these cameras is equivalent aperture range: 7.6 max. Good luck finding shallow DOF. The bigger the sensor the better.
Great memories? Kodak? All I remember is the frustration of not feeling free to experiment or even bracket because of the high price of film and processing. Maybe US$7.50 (about $33 today!) for both, for 36 frames in the mid-70's for what was basically a bulk commodity. I hated them and their dominance (like I hate Gillette now :).Hope this camera does well, but good riddance to the traditional film behemoth.
Oh damn, M4/3. These would be v cool specs for an APS-C travel zoom.
munro harrap: If Dpreview wishes to avoid prosecution in the UK under the Trades Descriptions Act will it please STOP telling punters this and others like it is a 1" sensor. It is NOT.I get a little tired of reading unprofessional lies whose intention is to deceive people into buying or believing anything, it so boring
Still, munro has a point. The sensor naming scheme can be stupidly confusing and misleading. The industry should decide on a logical, accurate and consistent format. DPR is using sq. mm, or maybe a diagonal measurement like a TV.
wetracy: “The whole point of taking pictures is so that you don’t have to explain things with words.”
That's what I thought when I saw these images several years ago when I worked in prisons and wrote about them. They could just as well be night shots of oil refineries out on the plains. Hardly seems a good way to "illuminate" the prison disgrace of the U.S.
However, I'm not surprised it's coming from an "editor" for whom I have such low regard. And yes, you don't have to remind -- that's MY opinion (as is everything else I've ever said in my entire life!).
Kind of agree, the subject is unclear in these. Just stark landscapes mostly.But okay, I'll bite, what's the "prison disgrace of the U.S"?
At least start with some attractive (female) faces…
Potentially good idea poorly executed. Not really interesting.
Waimak Stud: Um... Priorities? A country that doesn't yet want people to have equal freedoms under the law wants to send an Olympic torch into space? That doesn't make you look great, it kinda just makes you look like d1cks.
Russian equipment looks scary, but has done better safety-wise:By space program, 18 NASA astronauts (4.1%) and four Russian cosmonauts (0.9% of all the people launched) died while in a spacecraft.
I say good riddance. Like the old AT&T they unjustifiably screwed consumers for years on what was essentially a bulk commodity. A management team that just couldn't see the way forward.Nikon, are you paying attention?
No mention of how this lens compares optically to its predecessor. Is it sharper or less sharp than the previous version??
Having grown up in the area, you take the bridges for granted. I wonder why the new east span doesn't maintain the double-deck design of the original?
ahhh, brings back good memories. I spent much of my high school and college years riding freight trains around the western US. It wasn’t a “lifestyle,” but it was an adventuresome diversion. The second shot looks like the coast line on the former SP, a great but cold ride.I have to admit I’m jealous of these shots, very nice tone.
robjons: DP, can you please be more thorough about listing retail price in your reviews?
Any product review should always start with or at least include MSRP, not "street price" or Amazon price. In the above article I don't even see the price mentioned in the introduction. Then there is this line: "The X-Pro1 was generally well-received, but its price was always likely to limit its appeal." Okay, you imply a high price but don't bother to specify it. I have to scrounge around for it. Again MSRP only.Also, 'key feathers' should start with price as should the spec sheet (which I know usually does).Thanks.
Because, in the mist, I'll explain the obvious: in 1958 the US gov began requiring MSRP stickers on all new cars. This provided consumers with a universal starting point. It was more difficult to cheat new car buyers after this. You will not see car tests/reviews without the MSRP being listed. DP should simply list the maker's price, thats all.Everyone knows an MSRP in an article is the price at the time of publication, and that you may be able to find it cheaper. And change so fast? The D7000 was the same MSRP for about two years and the D7100 is the same price... as that, etc...
DP, can you please be more thorough about listing retail price in your reviews?