oselimg

oselimg

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 23, 2010

Comments

Total: 267, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Canon EOS 5DS R real world sample gallery posted article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: From the pictures I get that you absolutely need to nail exposure. The second picture is 2.3 stops pushed up from ISO 100 and looks like ISO6400. The DR of the portraits is bad, skin almost washed out. Canon sensor tech is years behind everyone.

@Samuel Spencer...Then it begs the question why you take pictures under such conditions knowing that it will not be true representation of the camera. Unless you have an ulterior motive

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2015 at 05:03 UTC

Can this update clear the stardust on Canon 750/760D sensors?

Direct link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 05:37 UTC as 14th comment

Self absorption and selfies always walk hand in hand.

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2015 at 05:28 UTC as 99th comment

If Nikon could do it, Canon can do better.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 04:38 UTC as 111th comment
On Massive $33,500 2450mm f/8 NASA lens surfaces on eBay article (234 comments in total)

Will Dpreview review it? Does it give pleasing skin tones on Martians etc.?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 29, 2015 at 05:49 UTC as 58th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Sergey Borachev: These prices just ensure that most people continue to go to M43. I really doubt how much better quality, if any, you can get out of this Zeiss 16-50mm than the smaller, lighter and much cheaper Panasonic 12-35mm or Olympus 12-40mm

Yeah, thanks, I can stop looking at Sony cameras from now on, since they are still making good quality lenses only at such prices. So long!

It's incredible that people who have no idea about the infant basics of physics compare a 35mm sensor/lens combination to mft sensor/lens combination. Probably because they only can count pixels in the correct order and can't do it backwards either :-))))

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 09:34 UTC

I didn't know Dpreview was followed by freelance scientists. They are swarming allover the place.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2015 at 05:45 UTC as 8th comment
On Samsung NX1 Review preview (1229 comments in total)

So, Dpreview doesn't rate cameras on the basis of image quality since NX1 is awarded gold. Or Do you have "different" criteria for each brand? Perhaps Samsung now is a huge company to ignore.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 05:32 UTC as 114th comment | 2 replies

For as far as I remember, with each new Canon model there are so many people here filed Canon for bankrupcy. I'm glad non of these idiots are managing Canon.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 05:13 UTC as 9th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

tkbslc: Wow, that D7200 looks good even up to ISO 12800! Barely any difference between it and the Canon 6D.

tkbslc must have had his/her Nikon glasses on while comparing cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 6, 2015 at 19:11 UTC
In reply to:

Happy Jones: Nikon now has 2 APS-C cameras that best some current FF cameras in the studio scenes (NX1 is very close too). DP Review has done a superb job showing us comparable images instead of numbers. Numbers don't show us noise patterns, banding, or poor color casting, which for me means the DPR comparisons are more useful.

Would you care to name those full frame cameras that D7200 bests please.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 6, 2015 at 19:09 UTC
In reply to:

oselimg: The trend in photographic gear development indicates towards subsidence of APC size DSLRs. I think the future will be shared between 4/3 sensor mirrorless cameras for size/weight reasons and 35mm DSLRs for obvious reasons which I won't go in to. Though I think we'll see more and more 35mm mirrorless machinery too.

I didn't think you would reveal yourself so quickly. You must be a sad person that the only authority you are able to practice is in a virtual world.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2015 at 07:45 UTC
In reply to:

oselimg: The trend in photographic gear development indicates towards subsidence of APC size DSLRs. I think the future will be shared between 4/3 sensor mirrorless cameras for size/weight reasons and 35mm DSLRs for obvious reasons which I won't go in to. Though I think we'll see more and more 35mm mirrorless machinery too.

It's amazing that how some people are not able to reply to a non aggressive comment without regressing to their troublesome adolescent years.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2015 at 07:06 UTC

The trend in photographic gear development indicates towards subsidence of APC size DSLRs. I think the future will be shared between 4/3 sensor mirrorless cameras for size/weight reasons and 35mm DSLRs for obvious reasons which I won't go in to. Though I think we'll see more and more 35mm mirrorless machinery too.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2015 at 09:27 UTC as 19th comment | 8 replies

Will these lenses be mirrorless? :-))))))))

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2015 at 13:33 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

oselimg: Mr. Maeda is either a snob with his head in the sand or he feels so relaxed to the extend of being casual because Canon is coming up with something big. Just remember what happened when they introduced the EF mount. I think that a company like Canon with an extensive range of quality lenses and know-how wouldn't let things slip off their hands as easily as some commentators here think.

@AbrasiveReducer...I fully share your view. Complacency had brought down many "glamorous" states in the history and it would have no difficulty doing so with any business large or small.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 09:41 UTC
In reply to:

oselimg: Mr. Maeda is either a snob with his head in the sand or he feels so relaxed to the extend of being casual because Canon is coming up with something big. Just remember what happened when they introduced the EF mount. I think that a company like Canon with an extensive range of quality lenses and know-how wouldn't let things slip off their hands as easily as some commentators here think.

@SFXR...When you've come out of your adolescence people might take you seriously. Or, perhaps you regress when you read the word "Canon"

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 09:31 UTC

Mr. Maeda is either a snob with his head in the sand or he feels so relaxed to the extend of being casual because Canon is coming up with something big. Just remember what happened when they introduced the EF mount. I think that a company like Canon with an extensive range of quality lenses and know-how wouldn't let things slip off their hands as easily as some commentators here think.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 23:21 UTC as 116th comment | 4 replies
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)

I think that PP focus point change is useful but I can't imagine average shooter is going to bother with post-processing who actually make up the bulk of camera sales also considering the ever increasing use of phonecameras. But for the enthusiast and pro video shooter it can be a valuable facility in hand. But again producing a video system which includes movie quality lenses will be very expensive operation that has to compete with established brands and systems. Good luck to them. They have a very steep hill to climb.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2015 at 09:24 UTC as 59th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Wow that looks like a stunner. However, I can't help but think that a Panasonic GH4 in capable hands with the right lenses could probably come close to matching it.

$28,000 to spend on lenses goes a really long way towards making the playing field even for the GH4.

@Archiver...Depends on which Subaru model you're comparing to. You'll get a lot of stick from Subaru fans :-)))

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2015 at 08:09 UTC
Total: 267, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »