oselimg

If you release your photos on subscription make sure they don't have any Adobe file extension ;-)

It will be Adobe Pirates stealing your money from now on. But I'm sure there will be alternatives soon for so called ''amateurs'' who do not use photography softwares everyday to make money from...

I don't think any product will cure boredom of the gearheads.

Ok you stick with Micro 4/3 there may be a 0.0000001% chance in the future. Because it's not only about megapixels. Perhaps you'll have to wait for laws of physics to change.

If people bothered to to be informed of cinema quality cameras they wouldn't make absurd comments like "why not micro 4/3 mount. It's almost like saying I want a Ferrari with a 1.6 Lada...

@howardoark...If I may ad to your comments that the "bored photograpers" are excited by new gear specs, and new gear news only. They lack talent in such extend if a camera in all auto setting...

Puh!! why this wasn't a 17-350 f1.8 full frame lens!!! do they think this is interesting? yawn, Nikon suck... an unfulfilled gearhead says.

Puh!! why this wasn't a 17-350 f1.8 full frame lens!!! do they think this is interesting? yawn, Nikon suck...

Some of the comments here are insult to human intelligence. When someone talks about ''the good old days'' which period of photography do they refer to? The beginning? Glass slides etc...? or 40's,...

After all this is a fast zoom lens with inevitable compromises. But what it's capable of producing comfortably outweighs any complaints. There is no such a thing as perfect zoom design or it would...

@ Ken Johnes...You are wasting you time replying people like "shamhain" they have nothing to do with photography, or a function of a particular lens, are only interested in numbers, newest gear,...

Marketing is the new opinion

Marketing/Endorsing is the new opinion

This not an opinion by any standards. It just repeats what the lens is. Did they test, it used it on a camera? This is just anaother MARKETING attempt by Dpreview. Once again this is a Nikon/Sony...

This not an opinion by any standards. It just repeats what the lens is. Did they test it, used it on a camera, where are the samples? This is just anaother MARKETING attempt by Dpreview. Once again...

Erm...actually "28mm equivalent F2.8 prime lens" means 28mm FF. It's 18,5mm in APS-C (Dx) format.

I would respectfully disagree about ISO 3200 being sufficient for low light photography. In my experience even with some ambient light(Street lights, shop windows etc.) subject moderately mobile...

These forums are outlets for, barring few photography enthusiasts, forever adolescents who are in to bashing, beating, walking all over something who would other wise have been serial killers.

What a sad response by Dpreview...While this is good web site for up to date info on gear one should ignore the ratings and evaluation given here. There are enough photos and technical info here...

What a sad response by Dpreview...While this is a good web site for up to date info on gear one should ignore the ratings and evaluation given here. There are enough photos and technical info here...