AngryCorgi

AngryCorgi

Lives in United States NoVA, United States
Joined on Sep 5, 2006

Comments

Total: 382, showing: 161 – 180
« First‹ Previous7891011Next ›Last »
On samsung_nxmini_ISO3200_SAM_0127 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Butchered that poor kitty.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 22:37 UTC as 1st comment
On Samsung announces NX3000 mirrorless camera article (193 comments in total)

The NX mini is a neat idea. Maybe if Samsung would focus on it and giving it a decent sensor and glass instead of continuing down this losing path, they could really compete.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 22:26 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
On Samsung announces NX3000 mirrorless camera article (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Samsung has become the biggest "me too" company on the planet. Let's release an identical camera to every other one except we'll design the exterior "scheme" to mimic Fujifilm's X series or an old film camera. That will differentiate it.

*sigh*

Who cares if they were the first. They have released 5 cameras in 12 months with very minor differences for the most part. Here they only released this one to feed off the fickle who they think would use their system if only it looked like Fuji's system. That's madness and its not innovative to say the least.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 22:24 UTC
On Samsung announces NX3000 mirrorless camera article (193 comments in total)

Samsung has become the biggest "me too" company on the planet. Let's release an identical camera to every other one except we'll design the exterior "scheme" to mimic Fujifilm's X series or an old film camera. That will differentiate it.

*sigh*

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 18:11 UTC as 32nd comment | 7 replies
On Samsung announces NX3000 mirrorless camera article (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Congrats to Samsung. They just tied Canon for the most recycled APS-C sensor. This is their 11th camera with a variant of their 20MP sensor, Canon hit #11 with the EOS M2 carrying a variant of their 18MP sensor.

Futility is a popular trait amongst some companies, to the point they seem to be competing at it.

Fair point random78. Of course, the exact same sensor IS in use in 5 product released in just the last 12 months. I remain confused by this nonsense of flooding the market with very slightly different products. Still smells of futility.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 17:00 UTC
On Samsung announces NX3000 mirrorless camera article (193 comments in total)

Congrats to Samsung. They just tied Canon for the most recycled APS-C sensor. This is their 11th camera with a variant of their 20MP sensor, Canon hit #11 with the EOS M2 carrying a variant of their 18MP sensor.

Futility is a popular trait amongst some companies, to the point they seem to be competing at it.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 16:35 UTC as 35th comment | 12 replies
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (692 comments in total)

Sensor performance appears practically identical to the G1X mkI

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2014 at 21:24 UTC as 174th comment | 2 replies
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2250 comments in total)

Next thing you know, we'll find out that the red dot leica sticker is actually applied by a robot and not a human!!! *shock*

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2014 at 20:53 UTC as 293rd comment | 1 reply
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2250 comments in total)
In reply to:

bakhtyar kurdi: Thanks Dpreview, so as I told you in early comments this is a $75 lens that they want to sell it for $2000.

In that case, I'd hate to see the images from an IS version!!

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2014 at 20:48 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2250 comments in total)

So much for leica IQ in these lenses.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2014 at 20:46 UTC as 294th comment | 1 reply
On Updated: Creating the Leica T article (196 comments in total)
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Stupid prices are stupid, no matter whether you milled 10% of the camera out by hand or not, that's no reasonable justification for it being 2-3x the price of the competition. How about you sell a Leica Lite model that's made by *gasp* machine, and sell it for half price and see what the market says about your hand-made excuses.

Contrary grump? WTF is wrong with you? You go off on anybody and everybody that says anything you disagree with or simply don't like. Chill the hell out already.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 19:18 UTC
On Updated: Creating the Leica T article (196 comments in total)
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Stupid prices are stupid, no matter whether you milled 10% of the camera out by hand or not, that's no reasonable justification for it being 2-3x the price of the competition. How about you sell a Leica Lite model that's made by *gasp* machine, and sell it for half price and see what the market says about your hand-made excuses.

Well, luckily, Leica doesn't hold a monopoly on taking amazing photographs; most of that being reliant on the person behind the camera anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 17:47 UTC
On Updated: Creating the Leica T article (196 comments in total)

Stupid prices are stupid, no matter whether you milled 10% of the camera out by hand or not, that's no reasonable justification for it being 2-3x the price of the competition. How about you sell a Leica Lite model that's made by *gasp* machine, and sell it for half price and see what the market says about your hand-made excuses.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:51 UTC as 55th comment | 8 replies
On Fujifilm announces 1.4x teleconverter for X100/X100S article (130 comments in total)
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: $350 for a filter-ring-TC?? Ehhhh...

Yeah, but the WA converter is a different animal. It is offering something not otherwise available - a wider FOV. A narrower FOV is readily available via cropping. So now, if the optical quality isn't good enough to soundly trump cropping and upsampling, the price is going to be hard to justify. You can't gather a wider FOV with software manipulation using only one exposure. We'll see, but even the best, most expensive TCs I've seen leave a lot to be desired.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 20:04 UTC

Ummm...this will surely result in the downfall of their mobile devices. I have zero faith that Microsoft has the necessary creativity AND restraint to allow Nokia phones to continue to improve without going off in some bone-headed direction to push some useless technology or software.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 19:59 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On Lytro announces Illum light field camera article (348 comments in total)

I commend Lytro for not giving up on their dream, but until this reaches resolutions in the 4-5MP range (native, not the pixelated mess they have right now on their sample stream), I don't see who is going to be taking the leap. I find the samples much more usable (at least web-sized stills can be made) than the old lytro, but its still not where it needs to be and the price is just nuts.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 14:23 UTC as 103rd comment | 2 replies
On Lytro announces Illum light field camera article (348 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: My guess is that actual image size is around 3.78 MP

After they upsample, yeah...I'm guessing native resolution will be roughly 975x975. I'll pass.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 14:10 UTC
On Fujifilm announces 1.4x teleconverter for X100/X100S article (130 comments in total)

$350 for a filter-ring-TC?? Ehhhh...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 22:31 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)

Wowzers...the way reflective objects "glow" at f/2 reminds me of shooting with my old radioactive Takumar 50 at f/1.4. Ewwww...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 21:03 UTC as 117th comment
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: there is nothing new with this camera, same old sensor tech, inferior color resolution and dynamic range compared to modern sensors from Sony,Toshiba,Panasonic, Aptina etc

Aptina? Why did you toss that in there? Aptina sensors are actually WORSE than Canon sensors across the board.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 22:39 UTC
Total: 382, showing: 161 – 180
« First‹ Previous7891011Next ›Last »