Dominick101: 808 is still king when it comes to IQ, period.
They didSony Z2 vs Nokia 808 : 79-77
Dominick101: DXO lost all their credibility which is for sure. Look into the fine details of their scores between 808 and Z2 and you will see how mismatch their comparison is. If you look further into the scores of iphone5s and 1020, you will, too, be shocked. DXO being a reputable site puts out bias rubbish scores which are most of the time subjective to the tester/user.
Sony Xperia Z2 79Nokia 808 77
a1strank: Put the 1" RX100 sensor in that thing and just take my money
Medium format sounds more tempting,
Juandante: It is very funny to see the amount of Fanboys here. Anyone agrees that the Samsung Galaxy S4 with its small 1/3 sensor have same if not better IQ than the old N8.
Same goes for this ancient 808 with tiny squeezy pixels, this is technology.
MistyFog why don't you join the DXO labs to perform tests that are more convenient to the results you'd like to get?
Or a Z2 wich is significant better from an 808
Soryy but just did (at least at DXO labs)
Well with the Xperia Z2 you can do that …… careless ;-)
if you compare an iPhone with your 808 in some of the areas the iPhone will excel that doesn't mean is better over your 808 …… or is it ?
You obviously haven't understood the title and the details of the article .
In that case even your iPhone takes a better photo.
DXO says that autofocus is one of the disadvantages of 808
DxOMark Mobile report: Sony Xperia Z2 takes top spot …… want it or not !!!!!!!You can keep on enjoy shooting with your (placed 2nd) 808
Menneisyys you haven't understood that being better in "some" areas, doesn't make 808 a better camera, exposure contrast and autofocus (specially the autofocus, as you can fix everything else in post editing programs) ARE the "key" features of a camera
Menneisyys your repeatedly posts are one more prove of how hard is for you to accept the obvious
I know it's hard for you to accept it (it's obvious) , but it's true, 808 is not on the first place, -i repeat-, 808 is on the second place, "Sony Xperia Z2 takes top spot " (as Dxo posts).It looks like big pixel count is not enough to be better.
So now that Sony have beaten 808, has taken the lead over any other P&S camera(even the Sony RX100-II), hasn't it?
MenneisyysAgain: DxOMark Mobile report: Sony Xperia Z2 takes top spot.808 strongest point scores 81 just like Xperia, 81 points.
- Video : both Xperia Z1 and Z2 dominate the list (for the time being) - Autofocus : Dxo noted (as one of the disadvantages -Cons-) that: "Autofocus can be better, especially at close range."so Who's on the top spot ?
MenneisyysWe've been doing this the last two years, and it's pointless, the only thing 808 or 1020(which is a lot worst compared to 808) can offer is only, useless big pixel count, nothing else, better IQ only compared with other smartphones. Now when it comes to comparison with a compact point and shoot camera, these camera phones don't stand a chance, it's not only the stabilization or the video, it's the the size of the lenses the zooming ability, the texture, the fast autofocus, the colors, the high iso or the low noise, want it or not P&S cameras produce better Image Quality