Menneisyys: "For those who prefer desktop computers over tablets Apple also introduced a new iMac with 5K Retina display that offers a whopping 5120 x 2880 screen resolution."
This is THE best news for me. (Even with the $2500 base model only sporting a weakish i5 and a severely underpowered GPU, meaning anyone wanting at least a semi-decent GPU will need to shell out $500 more for the CTO options.)
I REALLY hope the new iMac screens don't use PWM (see http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/pulse_width_modulation.htm ) - that'd pretty much rule it out for me. (I hate the PWM screen of my iMac 2009.)
Yes but who would like to spent 1000 on windows ? $1000 for windows 8 machine?
Petrogel: Unfortunately, Apple stays Internet depended, Thunderbolt remain useless, usb 3 is not an option (on iPads, as far as i know) and the useless 5k is the main feature for iMacs,
and all of them cost ..... something99
Unfortunately, Apple stays Internet depended, Thunderbolt remain useless, usb 3 is not an option (on iPads, as far as i know) and the useless 5k is the main feature for iMacs,
Petrogel: Well, this 6+ edition, unfortunately is "bending" under the pressure of competition .........
you can't be real, you are more of idiocy's algorithm than a human ....anything .
......and your idiocy more than your weight
Neither will flash the skies with their idiocy !!!
Overblown or not, it'll cost Apple a lot.
shaocaholica: Where's raw mode apple?
When Apple is building Application for Operating Systems that Apple build , then RAW is truer compared to any other phone manufacturer.
"The epitome" of idiocy, Can't escape It's nature.You are a Global beacon of world idiocy .
Poor little Idiot, unable to justify your existence (at least, from this account ) you keep coming repeatedly, to do what ? You know that i'm glad you do find my opinion worthless, you also know that i find that particularly flattering -"to be called "worthless" by an idiot- but not any ordinary Idiot, you,
"The epitome" of idiocy
Idiots always come for more, just like yourself, so i'm afraid i'll be seeing, sorry, reading you in one of my upcoming comments.You can't escape your nature
I' sure will be an application coming up the next few weeks
After 3 months of silence (from this account) your idiocy strikes back again on my comment thread, welcome back .
Hypothesising answers from unasked questions, shows inconvenience -among others- but nationalising your ‘obvious’ disturbance is pure stupidity. .........Is this an America (or whatever nationality you are) thing or is it just you ?
Well, this 6+ edition, unfortunately is "bending" under the pressure of competition .........
Petrogel: Let's hope we'll be seeing DxO's report for the Panasonic smart phone, ..... Soon !!!
It's interesting though, that DxO labs publicize Apple's report first.I'm sure that costed Apple an amount of ... something.
I would be very surprised if Apple didn't.
Let's hope we'll be seeing DxO's report for the Panasonic smart phone, ..... Soon !!!
Petrogel: What is really amazing, is that we haven't seen any "in depth" review from Dpreview personnel of any of the Leica's latest products. Either Leica is paying a Lot for it (not to review) or the "personnel" have nothing to compare this overpriced crap with.
Either-way this is an overpriced crap.
Raw DudeOMD is a camera just like Leica Xvario, E-M5 was wearing the Panasonic Leica D Vario-Elmarit 14-50mm F2.8-3.5 with OIS both cases Leicas were unable to catch up with competition.
I'll accept your argument in the first case 4/3 vs APSC, but OMD E-M5 was 4/3 and x vario APSC and believe me Olympus had better performance in both low light and daylight high iso.
One more thing, there was a Nikon1 J3 (199€)with my Nikkor 17-55 f2,8+adapter that was faster in daylight than the Leica
HowaboutRawLeica is an Overpriced brand aiming not to real photographers (specially with specs like these, on a camera like this), but to people trying to match the red dot with the nonexistent image of theirs. Leica sensors are ranked disappointingly low (for the amount of money paid) by the DxOmark (and not only).
When in 2008, we've compared Digilux 3 (Bought for 1700€) to a Canon EOS 400D (600€) we were very disappointed by the results Leica got.
Last March we did the test between Leica x Vario and the Olympus OMD E-M5, there was no reason for someone to spent that amount of money on a camera like Leica X vario, NO REASON AT ALL, try it yourself you'll be "amazed"...
Yes guys you are right, it's not a crap, how could it be a crap, when it's all made from Panasonic . About that Corolla, Porsche example , what if the Porsche is MADE IN CHINA.
P.S Still !!! we haven't seen any in depth review of this over-priced ...... Pana