Petrogel

Petrogel

Lives in Greece Greece
Joined on Feb 1, 2010

Comments

Total: 629, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Das ist Güt: Hands-on with the Leica Q article (63 comments in total)

Das ist eine teure nutzlos roten Punkt !!!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 14:37 UTC as 25th comment | 5 replies
On Shaker Dawn in the Morning. challenge (3 comments in total)

Congrats !!!!!! Great one.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 15:30 UTC as 3rd comment
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

RAW

-Who said there was a filter ?

-Scratched off?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 15:26 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

RAW

See the Above.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 14:30 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

Mescalamba

-CFA is a part of COLOUR sensors, glued or stack, sometimes even behind the photocathode layer.

-"How its stacked or glued on sensor is manufacturer decision" but always part of a colour sensors

-In some cases it is possible to "scratch" off CFA or CFM layers from a sensor, sometimes isn't, in Back-Illuminated sensors for example.

-Monochromes can NOT carry colour information as they are not equipped with CFA-CFM filters

-There are also three-CCD cameras whose imaging system uses three separate charge-coupled devices (CCDs)

-Always thought of Leica's as very stylish but extremely expensive of what they could offer, cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 14:26 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

HowaboutRAW

-Technically CFA is a part of all COLOUR sensors, how many sensors can you count without one? (except of course, the monochromes)(.....and the Foveon sensor )

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 17:05 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

HowaboutRAW:

-Never said RGB filter is the same thing as the sensor but a part of it on all colour sensors, giving colour information.

-Who said that you said about "no colours for post editing" ?

-I don't remember writing anything about Leica or Zeiss lenses

-And 'of course' i wouldn't agree more on "...better colour means better colour editing possibilities" which was at first place my main comment

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 16:26 UTC
In reply to:

veroman: Until one actually owns a Leica digital, one is really in no position to judge its worth or its capabilities. It's so very easy to denigrate the brand based on price alone and even easier to conclude that other cameras are just as good at a fraction of the price. One poster here says, "Is it better built? Probably." Probably? There's no probably about it. The precision that goes into the design and manufacture of Leica products is unequalled. You need only hold one in your hands and give it one click. Look at the seams, i.e. where a latch door meets the body. The seam is practically invisible. Most of you will own 10 or 15 different cameras by the time a single Leica needs servicing, if it does at all.

My friend the price this camera costs is like owning 10 to 15 different cameras

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 14:27 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

HowaboutRAW

-It is cutting colour information, RGB filter is giving you, unless you only shoot B&W or you have a back up Nikon D4s for the coloured ones.

-There are No Colours for post-editing, unless you never colour edit you photos before printing (in this case i totally respect your skills, which i doubt).

-Back during the film days Leica could cost as much as CanoNikon (i don't remember prices from that "era", i used to have a Nikon F 501 which was a really great camera), now days Leica is only selling brand name and MAYBE sharper images, nothing more.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 14:07 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)
In reply to:

Petrogel: If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

@HR
I agree the image quality is excellent ........ but for a € 1500 camera.
If Leica doesn't have any kind of trouble selling those bodies, that's good for Leica, but in my humble opinion it's a little bit pointless to cut off information from a sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 16:22 UTC
On Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on article (619 comments in total)

If the price will be similar to the IQ, then i'm sure it'll sell like hot cakes......
LOL

Direct link | Posted on Jun 1, 2015 at 13:58 UTC as 86th comment | 50 replies
In reply to:

Petrogel: Imagine how many people will ask for their money back, when they'll find out that their new shiny Samsung S6, is equipped with a photo sensor different to the one DxoMark ranked on top place on the mobile image quality list.

I'm sure Apple people are already smiling .

@Troj
You on the other hand are helpless, no matter what account you are using to comment

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 08:29 UTC
In reply to:

Petrogel: Imagine how many people will ask for their money back, when they'll find out that their new shiny Samsung S6, is equipped with a photo sensor different to the one DxoMark ranked on top place on the mobile image quality list.

I'm sure Apple people are already smiling .

Yeah!!! cause in any other case the "different" sensor might score higher, and the Samsung S6 will be the first Phone Camera to win itself in the next DxOMark sensor ranking.
LOL

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2015 at 21:06 UTC
In reply to:

Petrogel: Imagine how many people will ask for their money back, when they'll find out that their new shiny Samsung S6, is equipped with a photo sensor different to the one DxoMark ranked on top place on the mobile image quality list.

I'm sure Apple people are already smiling .

or iPhone 6

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2015 at 15:03 UTC

Imagine how many people will ask for their money back, when they'll find out that their new shiny Samsung S6, is equipped with a photo sensor different to the one DxoMark ranked on top place on the mobile image quality list.

I'm sure Apple people are already smiling .

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2015 at 14:53 UTC as 15th comment | 10 replies
In reply to:

Petrogel: Together with the remote control patent, the magnetic solution lens holder patent , the light field -like imaging system patent and who knows what's next patent, i believe Apple "will use this patent to sue anyone who'll design anything else about mobile devices.
And maybe one day Apple will patent photography itself

Correction,
During the 2000 "COMDEX" Microsoft introduced that tablet prototype .

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2015 at 15:57 UTC
In reply to:

Petrogel: Together with the remote control patent, the magnetic solution lens holder patent , the light field -like imaging system patent and who knows what's next patent, i believe Apple "will use this patent to sue anyone who'll design anything else about mobile devices.
And maybe one day Apple will patent photography itself

I know, just like Apple copied iPad from Acorn Computers, an ARM-based touch screen tablet in 1997 or the Microsoft when used the term tablet in 2000 for a prototype "COMDEX" a Tablet PC or in 2001 when Ericsson Mobile Communications introduced a similar device.
Now who "patents" whom ?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2015 at 15:38 UTC
In reply to:

Petrogel: Together with the remote control patent, the magnetic solution lens holder patent , the light field -like imaging system patent and who knows what's next patent, i believe Apple "will use this patent to sue anyone who'll design anything else about mobile devices.
And maybe one day Apple will patent photography itself

First thing first
The fact you took time to read the whole thread to defend a prick, is idiotic by itself but i'm sure you are a qualified for it

Second
The "penguin " calls himself south pole inhabitant, not me.

Third
Like it or not , What i wrote about Apple is my opinion,
Now go and play with other idiotic trolls like yourself .

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2015 at 14:46 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Janne Voutilainen article (36 comments in total)

Great photos poetic landscapes, Outstanding work !!!!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 26, 2015 at 08:05 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

Petrogel: Together with the remote control patent, the magnetic solution lens holder patent , the light field -like imaging system patent and who knows what's next patent, i believe Apple "will use this patent to sue anyone who'll design anything else about mobile devices.
And maybe one day Apple will patent photography itself

For sure i was not raised by emperor penguins, as i'm not Antarctica's inhabitant.
It's interesting tho you care so much about Greece's Economy, but you are as ignorant as a ....... penguin

ROFLMAOASTN

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 13:46 UTC
Total: 629, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »