ptox

Right, and then you'd complain their products are taking too long to release.

It's impossible to write perfect software for the present--and now you want it for the future, too?

Right, and then you'd complain their products are taking too long to release.

It's impossible to write perfect software for the present--now you want it for the future, too?

PPFFFFFTTTT

The entrant's gallery contains another very similar shot with exif data naming a Canon 600D:

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/7101672141/photos/2542396/img_0074

How lame.

Seriously?

photo perzon: knowing you, you'll have two of these next week.

Too late? Did you sell your soul or something?

(If not, there's always craigslist. Just sayin'...)

Why don't they do a bunch of stuff that only you seem to find value in? I'm not sure why you expect the rest of us to know...

Yeah, lead. Plus the best IBIS mechanism on the market, and an (almost undoubtedly) larger & more robust 1/8000 shutter mechanism.

I was going to say: "because its view is comparable in size to the OVF in the freakin' Canon 1D-X !"

But then I see that the NEX7 EVF is only a tiny bit smaller. Wow -- how'd they do that?

@Dave: But .. but .. XTRANS! <faint>

Good to know, Mr. Fuji.

... not material to YOU. So you should have asked, "why would I want this over the OM-D"? (Asked yourself, I mean. In your head. Not here.)

... not material to YOU.

So you should have asked, "why would *I* want this over the OM-D?"

(Asked yourself, I mean. In your head. Not here.)

Peiasdf: well, let's see... there's the much faster AF, the IBIS, the 1/8000 shutter, the smaller lenses, more lenses, the faster operation, the wifi...

I take it you're offering to have someone read the article for you and report back? Allow me:

- 1/8000 shutter
- ISO 100
- Focus Peaking
- Even better IBIS
- Improved rear screen
- WiFi
- Built-in...

"I have an iq of 154, but I really don't get what passes for art sometimes. No joke."

Please. The joke is that you expect us to infer your superiority in this matter via your result on one of many...

The 12-50 can do f/5.0 at 25mm, but you have it at f/7.1 -- one stop slower than necessary. You could have used ISO400, so that's one easy improvement.

What makes them "seem like toys"--the fact that they're small? That's silly; that's the point. Just for one example (and there are more), the Olympus 75/1.8 runs toe to toe with any of your...

It's also a small lens, you dolt.