Juck: You just keep using this same pic huh?
If you have something better enter it. Otherwise GFYS.
Simply amazing that 9 of the top 10 finishers had a 0.5 averaged into their score. Including 1 and 2. Wonder what that's all about...
cmantx: Nice shot and hopefully he keeps his eye on the ball just as well when he bats.
Thanks! I've seen some of your work (it's terrific) so your compliment really means something to me. Keeping his eye on the ball while batting is proving to be more challenging.
Ed at Ridersite: Extra nice light on that. Few folks appreciate the difficulty of catching two birds in focus, much less two different species.
Thanks Ed. I've seen some of your work so your compliment really means a lot to me!
Great capture. This was my choice to win.
zaks: Great capture
Cary Maures: nice portrait of a wonderful bird!
Steve Throndson: This was my pick to win. The squirrel's expression is fresh and curious. Great photo!
Thanks Steve. I've seen some of your work so your compliment really means a lot to me.
The Mick: I'd say you got him! Nice capture!
Thanks. I've seen your work so your compliment really means something to me.
Thanks. I was a little apprehensive about entering this as it depicts a child..
Some scumbag gave this a 0.5? Really? Maybe it doesn't deserve a 5, but a 0.5? I guess some gutless pussy was afraid my photo would beat his/hers.
Any vote of 0.5 should be thrown out if the voter does not provide an explanation and identify him/herself. I suspect some are voting 0.5 on photos that are considered "competition".
Really, this picture is a 0.5? Maybe not a 5 or even a 4 but there's no way it's a 0.5. How about the !@#$% that rated it 0.5 identify him/herself? You should not be permitted to vote on ANY photos anonymously. I suspect the same person gives low grades to any photos that are considered competion.
Jack Cat: You disqualified my photo for direct sunlight? The photo was taken at about 10:00 PM EST at ISO 2000. Do you want to try again?
I used a 70-200mm f/2.8 IS wide open at 200mm, 2000 ISO at 10:00 PM. The field was lighted but an action shot under those conditions qualifies as "low light". In my opinion, anway
You disqualified my photo for direct sunlight? The photo was taken at about 10:00 PM EST at ISO 2000. Do you want to try again?
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review