Stephen123

Stephen123

Joined on Dec 28, 2011

Comments

Total: 45, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

The screws do not connect to the plastic piece, they pass throw it and connect to the frame below it. So that plastic piece is a shim. For all we know it is a custom shim and a slightly different plastic spacer is chosen based on final measurements of the manufactured camera. Or if could be part of the springiness of the mount, augmenting the leaf springs.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 18:16 UTC as 54th comment
On HTC introduces the RE digital camera article (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nukunukoo: Obviously they are selling this product because of it's shape and accessories. Because the video specs are extremely unremarkable.

I think their selling the small size, the grip shape, and the wide angle view.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2014 at 21:03 UTC
On Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS article (248 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Is this camera just going to point out all of the imperfections of the lenses?

No, it is shooting 200MPixels to get better range and color, and to reduce noise in a 50MPixel shot. And it does have lenses that can handle 50MPixels. In that sense it’s like a stacked sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 18:54 UTC
On Sony a5100 First Impressions Review preview (590 comments in total)

Does anyone have thoughts on using this sort of flip up screen for shooting down toward the ground? Would you turn the camera around to get a position more stable than leaning over?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2014 at 07:42 UTC as 37th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Stephen123: There’s a pretty big Sony vs. Canon question in what color those arches bait up and left of center look to the human eye. Sony has them white and a bit blown out. Canon has them warm and detailed. If they are cream or yellow to the human eye then Sony is screwing up. If not, Canon is screwing up. It’s not like it’s a small difference.

If the arches were turned on it makes sense. It’s not the Adobe RAW calibration because it happens in the JPEGs. In addition to the arches and the windows under the crane, the rendering is different in the crosswalk in the foreground.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2014 at 17:22 UTC

There’s a pretty big Sony vs. Canon question in what color those arches bait up and left of center look to the human eye. Sony has them white and a bit blown out. Canon has them warm and detailed. If they are cream or yellow to the human eye then Sony is screwing up. If not, Canon is screwing up. It’s not like it’s a small difference.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 18:23 UTC as 99th comment | 5 replies

The people in this video either don’t understand, or are being portrayed as not understanding the basics of digital preservation. That’s a bit disturbing given that this is a top flight preservation project.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2014 at 17:31 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

Ben Raven: HELLO, SONY -- A7r Electronic First Curtain Update !
PRONTO !

Get on this same EFC shutter firmware update for the A7r.
You've already got it in the A7 . . .

Let us say 'Ba-Bye' to shutter shock and clunk-clunk.

Thank you for your prompt attention.

It seems like this approach would work as a firmware update. The A7r has a limit on the speed of the electronic shutter that they felt was too slow. But why not use electronic shutter on longer exposures and mechanical shutter only for very short exposure? It’s an obvious idea once someone says it.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2014 at 17:31 UTC

A third party add-on to remove vibration would be much harder and more expensive. And vibration is easier to remove in post. This device doesn’t replace software solutions, it makes software solutions more effective.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2014 at 01:41 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

Biowizard: There are already many, established, available and reliable "gimble" mounts for GoPro - what does this one have to offer that is any different?

Brian

Can you provide a link?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2014 at 01:38 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Sigma DP2 Quattro article (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

carlos roncatti: Why the heck no photos with the guy holding the camera showing a position that he will take photos with it?

That video shows one person using the camera with the weight of the camera on their pinky finger. The other person seems to be having an easier time, but they have their finger and thumb in surprisingly contorted positions. It looks like it may be a little more natural if you put the lcd a few inches from your face with your right forefinger pointing approximately straight up.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 16:07 UTC
On Blackmagic Production Camera 4K available now for $3000 article (110 comments in total)

Specs hère don't say the frame rate at 1080p, if 1080p is 444 or if 1080p uses all the pixels or just samples.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2014 at 18:43 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

noegd: A local shop sells the DP Merrill for 399€ (each, not the three of them) Maybe I should get one before the last "true Foveon" cameras are gone?

Had an original DP1 and loved its IQ (in good light).

These have less overall resolution and a weird case design that they haven't even attempted to explain. So I think grabbing the old model may be fairly reasonable.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2014 at 17:07 UTC
In reply to:

Stephen123: Seems pretty clear that it's a derivative work. It also seems pretty clear that that doesn't effect whether the sculptor is owed money. I am a bit shocked though that the federal government made a national monument without buying the right to use the image of the monument. I'm also surprised by the ruling that being on a stamp hurts anyones financial prospects.

Some people may be confused by the references to "Transformative". The court isn't saying anything about the photograph not being a creative work. In this case 'Transformative" would mean parody, criticism, academic research and that sort of thing. So saying the work is not Transformative is NOT the court saying the photograph is not its own original but derivative work.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2013 at 18:50 UTC

Seems pretty clear that it's a derivative work. It also seems pretty clear that that doesn't effect whether the sculptor is owed money. I am a bit shocked though that the federal government made a national monument without buying the right to use the image of the monument. I'm also surprised by the ruling that being on a stamp hurts anyones financial prospects.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2013 at 18:34 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

RobAHu: Talk to me when it comes with AF.

I think it's interesting that they chose 55 rather than 50. I suspect there was some reason in the optical design that made 55 the easiest to build for this spec.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 18:46 UTC
In reply to:

ianp5a: The point of the device is to encourage learning of the technology. But rather than being a stepping stone for beginners, it drops them right in at the deep end. It offers nothing new to help people learn. Apart from the price.
If you have never used a command line before and you blindly paste a command in, you have not learnt anything and you probably will not understand any error message if something goes wrong. In which case you will probably need to know a whole load of other commands to be able to cope. Which is why he pointed out this problem. Sadly, scaring potential users off. The thing is only suitable for a few.

It's not an educational product for teaching technology. It is a component for a low cost open computer hardware platform create by DIYers and often used for education.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2013 at 17:30 UTC
In reply to:

Greg Lovern: When wonderful old works, who's current copyright holder can't be located and may not even know that they inherited the copyright, can't be published without risking multi-million dollar settlements, the culture is impoverished. That's how it is today now that the copyright law pendulum has swing far, far over to the side of protecting creators.

It's possible to provide reasonable protection to new creators without disappearing the works of wonderful old creators who's current copyright holder can't be found. But finding that balance requires that new creators be required to put some minimal effort into registering their works.

Works can be registered in aggregate, as in a large set of photographs or the entire contents of a magazine.

All creative works are automatically protected without registration in all countries that ratified the Universal Copyright Convention. That is most countries and includes the US. The US used to have registration and the argument was that it enriched the library of congress, not that it was necessary to protect artists. To preserve this goal, the US now requires registration in order to get punitive damages in a suit but not to get compensatory damages.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 15:54 UTC
On Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction article (1853 comments in total)

I haven't seen any speculation about whether this will also effect Photoshop Elements. Is anything known?

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 18:45 UTC as 306th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm X100S Digital Split Image focus - how it works article (101 comments in total)

I think I would prefer a combination of contrast, phase-detection and Sony's focus peaking; as long as the phase-detection is better than the current Sony on-chip system.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2013 at 20:41 UTC as 41st comment | 3 replies
Total: 45, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »