Lives in United States Cincinnati, OH, United States
Works as a Environmental Engineering Student
Joined on May 20, 2007


Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5

I bet a lot of work (lighting, processing) went into making these shots passable. The same amount of work put into shots taken with a real camera would have resulted in much more appealing images.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2013 at 21:39 UTC as 57th comment | 1 reply
On - in the Boldness challenge (2 comments in total)

really good timing.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 20, 2012 at 07:15 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Nathaniel George Weir: So heres the mega pixel count for Nikon cameras.
clueless picture taker: d3200 24.2 Megapixels
amateur: d5100 16.2 Megapixels
semi-pro: d7000 16.2 Megapixels
pro: d300s 12.3 Megapixels
pro: d800 36.3 Megapixels
Very pro: D4 16.2 Megapixels

So why would nikon put an obsurdly large megapixels sensor in a $700 camera? Because Nikon know that people who buy these budget consumer cameras, shoot in the green box mode (auto), and are too stupid to understand that having so many megapixels doesn't make you take better pictures. Most people assume that if you have more megapixels, then your camera is better and you are a better photographer. 95% people that are in the market to buy a d3200 won't print photos that are bigger than 8x10. There's a reason that the D4 has 16 Megapixels. Because real pros that take great pictures don't need a camera that has 16 Megapixels. I have printed a 24x36 print from a 12 Megapixel and the print quality is fine. I doubt that people who will take


Now what, exactly, did he say in his harmless post that made you decide it was your prerogative to belittle him? This is just a discussion about camera gear- there's no need to insult anybody.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 18:29 UTC
In reply to:

Ashley Pomeroy: It's a shame they couldn't build the wireless thing into the body. That's the way things are going. I've always maintained that entry-level photographers generally *need* pro-calibre cameras; they need fast, reliable autofocus to capture their kids, they need excellent high-ISO and flash metering for parties, and they need a built-in wireless transmitter to get the photos to Facebook. Until recently the only cameras that could do those things were pro-level, but now things are changing.

Entry-level camera buyers are essentially photojournalists, taking and sharing images of real life - maybe not whilst being shot at, but real life nonetheless. Something that future generations might relate to. Rather than boring seascapes and awful HDR rubbish that will die and be forgotten. The amateurs and the pros are alive; the people in the middle - with their tripods and graduated filters and waffling blog posts about their workflow - they're the dead ones. Dead inside.

I'd rather look at a picture of a seascape than a picture of somebody I've never known and don't care about. To each his or her own.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 18:20 UTC
On let-them-free... in the Fenced Out challenge (5 comments in total)

against it if even to preserve from extinction?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2012 at 00:10 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 5, showing: 1 – 5