LensBeginner

"...il matto prima o poi tira fuori i Templari."

So basically:
<b>What I want:</b> less limitations
<b>Will it happen?</b> hahahaha... NO!

...better twit than 7w@7... :-D

Ok, thanks, I'll look into it. Yeah, something like that. However we'll also use the videos for promotion (maybe the odd video on youtube/website etc.) so I'd like quality not to be absolute...

Could you point me towards a model/make/period/product range, something that gives me a vague idea of what you are intending? Like, I don't know, Sony's middle range of 2010, Panasonic...

Hi, I need a camcorder to record some concerts/rehearsals for résumé use. I was looking at models under 200E, because I don't need stellar video quality. What I really need is 1. continuous...

That's a shared feature of *all* forms of government, including democracy (plus, think Gaussian distribution and figure where is that going to lead regarding average intelligence).

So no need to...

Rally photos is not something you can do with a smartphone.
I know, I tried.

Hell, it's a difficult task with a DSLR, and when I snapped away at the drivers I sorely missed a second curtain flash...

You still can buy it, both new (leftover stock) and used (eBay, Amazon...). I was thinking about it myself, so I don't think this thread is only rhetorical.

You didn't get the point.
You are still confusing the theory with its distorted application.
Communism wasn't meant to be a one-man show and USSR's and China's implementations.

You didn't get the point.
You are still confusing the theory with its distorted application.
Communism wasn't meant to be a one-man show like USSR's and China's implementations.

Well, maybe I'm not "most people".
And glad of it.

@ryanshoots
Who has ever cared about quality in the first place?
That's mass market for you.

@ryanshoots
Who has ever cared about quality in the first place?
That's mass market for you.
It's a sad state of things, and it's not only apparent in photography/journalism.

@ryanshoots
Who has ever cared about quality in the first place?
That's mass market for you.
It's a sad state of things, and it's apparent not only in photography/journalism, but almost everywhere.

You are confusing Marx's theories with the actual (distorted) application in the real world by Eastern Countries during the last century.
Almost every American does, from my experience.

True...

the editor is... wait for it... ACDSee Photo Editor! :-)

ACDSee is the basic, mainstream photo viewer.
ACDSee Pro is more advanced, with 64bit native RAW support and so on.

The good thing about them is that if you want to use them only as a viewing tool...

ACDSee is the basic, mainstream photo viewer.
ACDSee Pro is more advanced, with 64bit native RAW support and so on.

See...

ACDSee is the basic, mainstream photo viewer.
ACDSee Pro is more advanced, with 64bit native RAW support and so on.

See here:
http://files.acdsystems.com/english/support/wpm-en-2011.pdf
(a little...