dlmvegas

dlmvegas

Joined on Jul 27, 2012

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Nikon announces full-frame D810 with no OLPF article (97 comments in total)
In reply to:

mustaphapashu: Yikes! Watch the price plummet on the D800s...look out, here I come!

Stay away from the D800.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 02:03 UTC
On Nikon announces full-frame D810 with no OLPF article (97 comments in total)
In reply to:

Carlos Loff: Good stuff but ridiculous price - Only new-rich People will sell their D800 or D800E to go for the latest - Very disappointed

For me is time to buy my new camera but I have been waiting so long for D400 - Will change to Sony, no kidding

It's a shame that Canon doesn't have a better selection of lenses at 2.8 aperture or I'd be buying a 5D myself.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 01:55 UTC
On Nikon announces full-frame D810 with no OLPF article (97 comments in total)

If it's anything like the D610 garbage they came out with to fix the D600 problems, I'm not jumping on board for this. If the OLPF problem was fixed with software does that mean there's an update for the D800's?

I suppose Nikon will not fix problems with the D800 & 800E but add more problems to the D810. You've cried wolf to much Nikon and your customer service sucks. It's always the photographers fault. Of course you'll deny that any problems exist if there are any.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 01:54 UTC as 6th comment
On Hands-on with the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR article (258 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hansplast26: I think this lens is overpriced (like many nikon lenses), yet it will sure sell like hot cakes. For a fraction of the price you get the very decent Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6, for field work this lens will do just great.

My case in point is the Sigma 70-200 F/2.8 lens. Got it Tuesday and returned it Thursday. This turned out to be you get what you pay for. It was only $1250.00 but wide open too soft and too much edge softness at the other apertures.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2013 at 22:57 UTC
On Hands-on with the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR article (258 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gregg Humphrey: nice test and images, but why all static subjects? No action shots, or wide-open, shallow DoF images ?? I like the smaller dimensions and weight of the F/4 VR, but not at the cost of action and shallow DoF capability. And $224 extra for the tripod ring is obscene, Nikon is really gouging on that one imo.

I agree. Lighter and smaller than the 2.8 counterpart. Who would need the overpriced tripod ring to begin with.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2013 at 22:48 UTC
On Hands-on with the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR article (258 comments in total)

You're all saying that Nikon is gouging people for the tripod mount ring yet you are ordering the thing. If people don't buy one of those things then maybe Nikon will get their head out of their rears and re-think the price. No way I will pay the price. For what they are charging for the lens it should be part of the package.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2013 at 22:45 UTC as 4th comment
On Nikon AF-S 70-300 mm VR lens article (3 comments in total)

I have read review after review of 300mm lenses. Does any company make a 300mm that is sharp at 300mm? Most of the reviews of the zoom variety say that at 300mm it's soft. So why buy a 300mm zoom? Also can't seem to find any plain 300mm lens reviews where they aren't soft either.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 27, 2012 at 23:30 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7