Alberto Tanikawa

Alberto Tanikawa

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Apr 25, 2001
About me:

D3 | D7100 | D2xs | D200IR | D3000 | 10.5 | 17-35 | 18-70 | 24 1.4 | 28-70 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.4 | 105 VR | 70-200 VR | Lensbaby | SB-700 | SB-800 x3 | SB-600 | AlienBees B1600 | VML | PW Plus III x3 | Markins | RRS | Gitzo | Mac Pro | ...

Comments

Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On onOne Software's Perfect Effects 8 available for free article (117 comments in total)
In reply to:

Smokymtnhiker: Only a free-trial now.

I just downloaded the full version a few minutes ago, complete with a full license number. Maybe you could try again?

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 04:38 UTC

Neat!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2014 at 05:23 UTC as 3rd comment
On Nikon D4s: CP+ Hands-on and interview article (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fahd: Nikons flagship offers full HD while most flagship smart phones now offer 4k.

4K from a tiny sensor compared to 1080p from a much bigger sensor... Marketed to different crowds, different quality standards too. I would take 1080p with ProRes 4444 over 4K with h.264 and low bitrates.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 25, 2014 at 07:03 UTC

Would've liked to see a firmware update for my D7100 to allow dual functions to Fn and Pv, like I have it in my D3. As it stands it's single function only: either press or press+turn, not both.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2013 at 18:09 UTC as 15th comment

I have 20-13 vision, and I can read the e-mails on my phone from 30" away, 20" comfortably. I don't use my phone at 8" - I think that's ridiculous, or whoever does needs to have their eyes examined (nearsighted). Instead of ever increasing pixel density, how about higher contrast, much higher color gamut, more accurate color calibration from factory, better visibility in direct sunlight, higher efficiency, etc. These are much more worthwhile features to add than pixel density beyond 300dpi.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 16:03 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On SanDisk introduces first CFast 2.0 memory card article (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

SHood: This will kill the Nikon backed QXD. That would explain why no one else supported QXD.

Donnie G, CFast is not compatible with CF. The former uses a serial type transfer, while the latter uses a parallel type. Wish they were compatible though.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2013 at 15:23 UTC
In reply to:

DDWD10: Haven't electronically-controlled ND filters been used before in compact cameras in lieu of actual aperture blades to reduce diffraction? I remember hearing this. Of course, Nikon's proposed system is much more advanced.

I was going to mention this, but you've beaten me to it :) It would be nice to have a manually adjustable electronic ND filter built into the sensor. Something with a range of 1-3 stops would be good; 1-10 would be perfect.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2013 at 14:26 UTC
On Nokia's 41MP Lumia 1020 looks impressive post (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

MaxiMax: For this sensor size, there is absolutely no DOF (aperture) control and no bokeh effect... As with any camera phone, It is just a snapshot camera aimed for image documentation and not artistic photography.

Houseqatz, I'm not disputing that the lens is not f/2.2, rather that the 8mm f/2.2 lens on the 2/3" sensor would have a similar amount of background blur of a 26mm at f/8 on a full frame sensor. I know my phone has a tiny sensor and everything looks sharp - its f/2.8 lens is no help. My crop body camera at f/2.8 blurs the background nicely; my full frame camera is even better at that; and the large format camera I played with in college just takes the cake. The real focal length, not equivalent focal length, helps determine the amount of background blur. This cannot be disputed, it's physics.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 27, 2013 at 04:43 UTC
On Nokia's 41MP Lumia 1020 looks impressive post (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

MaxiMax: For this sensor size, there is absolutely no DOF (aperture) control and no bokeh effect... As with any camera phone, It is just a snapshot camera aimed for image documentation and not artistic photography.

yabokkie, from a wiki on the 1020 the exact focal length seems to be 8.02mm. The Nokia stated 26mm is a full frame equivalent - it had to be since the phone is only 10.4mm thick (slightly thicker in the camera section, and 14.5mm in the grip).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2013 at 15:11 UTC
On Nokia's 41MP Lumia 1020 looks impressive post (227 comments in total)
In reply to:

MaxiMax: For this sensor size, there is absolutely no DOF (aperture) control and no bokeh effect... As with any camera phone, It is just a snapshot camera aimed for image documentation and not artistic photography.

A 2/3" sensor with 8mm f/2.2 would be roughly equivalent to a full frame 26mm f/8. You'd have to be VERY close to your subject in order to achieve any kind of background blurring. The second comment (by user OGLark) on the link provided by kenikh says it all. You can't change the laws of physics.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2013 at 05:09 UTC
On Nokia's 41MP Lumia 1020 looks impressive post (227 comments in total)

I see a similar painterly/watercolor effect from recent Fuji cameras equipped with X-Trans sensors. Specially apparent in areas of foliage and other high frequency details. Even in good light images have an over-processed look with blocked up details, which seem to be from unrefined noise reduction (the Fuji images where this fault does not appear have a more refined/natural look though). Reducing the images down to 5mp masks these imperfections well, but cannot hide the so so dynamic range of the sensor (the cityscape shot is clipped on both ends, much more so in the shadows). If users shoot at 5mp only, this actually looks decent and very detailed compared to other camera phones out now.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2013 at 05:59 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1333 comments in total)
In reply to:

maksa: Please correct some statements. First, not each new EOS had an improved CMOS sensor, please recall 10D, 30D or 400D. Second, 7D has a 3" 920k LCD screen, not 3.2" 1040k.

Also, D7100 is shown to have incorrect lcd screen info. It's 1,228,800 dots instead of 920K.

Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 16:53 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1333 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nukunukoo: My question now is: Go for the better IQ of Blackmagic's Pocket Cinema or the better/faster focusing and articulating screen of the 70D?

The BMPC has such a tiny battery, you will need to bring along a ton of spares, or use an external battery pack, which defeats the purpose of it being pocketable. But the video IQ would be more desirable on the BMPC than any other DSLR, save for a ML 5D III shooting raw video. :)

Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 14:05 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1333 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank_NZ: Many camera reviewers comment that missing a headphone socket on cameras is a minus. I ask is it something really needed? In today's world we have many quality solid state audio recorders (Sony PCM D50 comes to mind) that could be attached to the camera. This unit would allow headphones and has line output which when adjusted with a little electronic circuit could also feed direct audio to the camera without distortion. While appreciating DP review is essentially a site for photograhers now that video is established around the world maybe it is time to look and review other accessories which is now so much more a part of the photographic world.

It's good to have a headphone jack to make sure your camera is actually recording sound. If you forget to hit record on your sound recorder prior to start filming, you'll get a silent movie. It's nice that Canon includes timecode on their higher end models, but it would be even better to see all manufacturers adopt it, AND add a remote function so you start recording on the camera from an external monitor/recorder (already available on few Canon models) for both video AND sound.

Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 13:58 UTC

Soon we'll have cameras that will not work unless they are connected to the internet. Oh, let's not forget the monthly fees in order to use it too. I thought the Nikon 1 V2 was ugly, but it seems Samsung wants to match it.[/sarcasm] Interesting concept, but no thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2013 at 19:44 UTC as 68th comment | 3 replies
On Adobe releases subscription-only Photoshop CC article (408 comments in total)

Two words Adobe: Meta Raw. 'Nuff said.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2013 at 14:58 UTC as 154th comment
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review article (397 comments in total)

I found the video from the D7100 plenty sharp using my 105/2.8 Macro and 24/1.4. After spending so much money on an FX body, and wanting to learn to shoot video, I find the D7100 attractively affordable.

FYI, to those concerned about headphones with larger plugs: the D7100 will accommodate the plug from an Audio Technica MH50, which is 3/8" (~9.5mm) wide.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2013 at 05:46 UTC as 21st comment
In reply to:

Alberto Tanikawa: I've heard of people doing weddings entirely on an iPhone with SLR lens adapters, but now it's getting to a point of diminishing results. This is similar to what Canon and Nikon already do with their flash systems, without using wifi. It's interesting piece of technology, but as I recall wifi latency was much longer than what current radio transceivers (ie Pocket Wizard Plus III) offer: ~20ms vs 0.83ms. That can adversely affect flash timing when working with multiple remote units at varying distances, specially if you're trying to use the maximum sync speed on some cameras (4ms for 1/250s sync). Also, current radios are very power efficient, using less than 1mW while an iPhone 4, for example, uses 700mW just idling. Right now I think this is a gimmick, but in time, if latency and power issues can be overcome, I'm sure this could become a powerful tool for both consumers and professionals.

http://petapixel.com/2011/06/27/first-wedding-ever-to-be-shot-entirely-with-the-iphone-4/

and

https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=417056869491

They aren't my cup of tea, but I guess some people like it.

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2013 at 05:52 UTC

I've heard of people doing weddings entirely on an iPhone with SLR lens adapters, but now it's getting to a point of diminishing results. This is similar to what Canon and Nikon already do with their flash systems, without using wifi. It's interesting piece of technology, but as I recall wifi latency was much longer than what current radio transceivers (ie Pocket Wizard Plus III) offer: ~20ms vs 0.83ms. That can adversely affect flash timing when working with multiple remote units at varying distances, specially if you're trying to use the maximum sync speed on some cameras (4ms for 1/250s sync). Also, current radios are very power efficient, using less than 1mW while an iPhone 4, for example, uses 700mW just idling. Right now I think this is a gimmick, but in time, if latency and power issues can be overcome, I'm sure this could become a powerful tool for both consumers and professionals.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2013 at 15:53 UTC as 33rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

huyzer: I hope they come out with Nikon RAW video output. But it looks like they're focused on Canon, and getting that done right, first?

8-bit uncompressed video is akin to TIF, not RAW.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 14:11 UTC
Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »