jhinkey

jhinkey

Lives in United States Seattle, WA, United States
Works as a Aerospace Engineering Consultant
Has a website at www.hinkey.zenfolio.com
Joined on Dec 27, 2005

Comments

Total: 318, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

jhinkey: The questions that I have are:
- Does it have the same sensor cover that produces reflections with bright light sources like the A7 does?
- How loud is the shutter? Both the A7 and A7r are loud
- Does IBIS work with legacy glass in both photo and video mode
- Is the water resistance improved
- Does it have an AA filter and if so how strong is it

I would consider swapping out my A7r for the A7II if it improves in these areas.
Great that Sony is iterating on their A7 lineup!

To add to my comments above - does it have a fully electronic shutter capability - that would be killer if it did.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 18:30 UTC
In reply to:

Ron A 19: Looks great! Better grip and improvements to the finicky a7. Way to go! Next step: tuck that EVF into the body - there's no need for a prism hump!

Yep, no need for a prism hump, but there is a need for the EVF optics hump.
If they did try to tuck it into the body you would lose out on LCD size and buttons on the back.
I say keep the EVF where it is.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 15:52 UTC

The questions that I have are:
- Does it have the same sensor cover that produces reflections with bright light sources like the A7 does?
- How loud is the shutter? Both the A7 and A7r are loud
- Does IBIS work with legacy glass in both photo and video mode
- Is the water resistance improved
- Does it have an AA filter and if so how strong is it

I would consider swapping out my A7r for the A7II if it improves in these areas.
Great that Sony is iterating on their A7 lineup!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 15:50 UTC as 159th comment | 9 replies

The most disappointing thing is that Nikon, with it's limited resources, spent time and $$ developing the gold-adorned Nikon Df. If Nikon thinks that much of the Df then they are truly in trouble as a company.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2014 at 15:40 UTC as 47th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

jhinkey: Why don't they mark the anniversary by producing the Df2 that many people wanted - i.e., the "digital FM3A". Better yet give us the Nikon version of the Sony A7R (or even the A7S).

HowAboutRAW -

Yes, Nikon could make a full frame mirrorless - sell an adapter that allows use of AFS, AFD, and AI-S lenses - with a new mount that is shallow and a set of new mirror-less, short mount distance lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2014 at 05:34 UTC
In reply to:

jhinkey: Why don't they mark the anniversary by producing the Df2 that many people wanted - i.e., the "digital FM3A". Better yet give us the Nikon version of the Sony A7R (or even the A7S).

I'd forgo the mirror in a heartbeat - I'm not a sports shooter so high FPS is not required. High focusing accuracy IS required and it's a pain in the ass with my D800. I really like my mirroless cameras (m43 and A7R). I really dislike the layout and ergonomics of the A7R and the lack of native lenses and poor focus assist implementation really hinders it.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 17, 2014 at 22:54 UTC

Why don't they mark the anniversary by producing the Df2 that many people wanted - i.e., the "digital FM3A". Better yet give us the Nikon version of the Sony A7R (or even the A7S).

Direct link | Posted on Nov 17, 2014 at 22:19 UTC as 152nd comment | 8 replies
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photoman: Um, these have been out since April DPreview guys. Has it taken Manfrotto that long to contact you? I'm now using quite a few Outdoor UV (8 Layer) filters and they are very good and they are a lot cheaper than the Hoya Pro D & HD filters.

Oops - the above was supposed to be a response to DonnaRead54

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 23:27 UTC
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photoman: Um, these have been out since April DPreview guys. Has it taken Manfrotto that long to contact you? I'm now using quite a few Outdoor UV (8 Layer) filters and they are very good and they are a lot cheaper than the Hoya Pro D & HD filters.

One can hope that a new-comer to the market can shake up the established companies and produce new/interesting versions or lower prices through competition. Though I've been generally happy with my few Marumi and many B+W filters the price of the B+W's can be painful. I'm especially looking forward to better CPL filters for the better glass and higher resolution sensors we have these days.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 23:26 UTC
On Manfrotto introduces new lens filter lineup article (125 comments in total)
In reply to:

BadScience: "pro" filters are to photography what monster cables are to hifi.

Uh, the "pro" filters typically do perform or operate better than the lower cost versions. Is it worth it? Only you can decide for how and what you shoot.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2014 at 01:55 UTC

What are fools to spend their money on now?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2014 at 04:22 UTC as 160th comment | 1 reply

Let's face it - there is no generally accepted definition of what constitutes "pro" gear. A competent photographer (pro or not) can make fine images with an array of digital camera formats and lenses. Be that as it may, I think we all tend to think of "pro" gear as being more durable with faster glass at more exotic focal lengths (from ultra-wide angle to long telephoto) as well has higher performance in video, stills, and action than "consumer"grade gear.

I've made fine images with my m43 gear that anyone would have a hard time figuring out which format I used. Other times full frame was really necessary to get an acceptable image.

Assuming the image quality is excellent from this new 7-14/2.8 I'm sure it will be able to make professional images - I will certainly buy one if I can as there are many times my FX "pro" gear is too heavy/bulky to make the trip (and maybe even unnecessary).

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2014 at 23:08 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Everlast66: I think it is laughable to call anything associated with the M4/3 system "PRO"!!

Surely there would be one or two enthusiasts, but no normal professional will rely on a M4/3 sensor for their professional work.

Well then, how do you define a camera/lens as being "pro"?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 15:57 UTC
On Price released for Brikk's 24k gold Nikon Df article (389 comments in total)

A fool and their money will soon part ways on this ridiculous thing. Wonder how many they will actually sell or if it's just a publicity stunt.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2014 at 02:59 UTC as 139th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1864 comments in total)
In reply to:

Swingline: Gordon Laing at Cameralabs said he is getting only a 2-stop advantage from the LX-100's OIS, less than other Panasonics. I would be interested to see if you have the same results.

OIS doesn't work as well for every person - i.e., each person holds the camera differently and have a different characteristic shake when they try to take a picture. Plus some people are very smooth when they trip the shutter while others shake the camera when they press the shutter button. OIS is better at correcting lower frequency than high frequency shake, so the OIS will not have as much effectiveness for someone who is pretty jittery or stabs at the shutter button.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 04:34 UTC
In reply to:

Ontario Gone: 65mm is a bit short for anything I would use portraiting on apsc, looks like this is mostly good for MFT. Makes it tempting to pick up a body just to play around with portraits...

AND no OIS either, which I find indispensable for low light video on my GX7 when using the PL 42.5/1.2.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 23:12 UTC
In reply to:

jhinkey: We'll see how well it matches up to the PL 42.5/1.2 - it will be tough I'm sure as mine is an excellent lens. Remember you do get AF and OIS for that $1.5K PL though.

Yep, I shot the 45/1.8 m.Zuiko against the 42.5/1.2 PL and I liked the PL much better at the same apertures. Was the cost increase worth the extra stop and OIS? Maybe at MSRP, but I found a deal on the PL for $1299 and I thought it was very worth it for that price.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 23:09 UTC

We'll see how well it matches up to the PL 42.5/1.2 - it will be tough I'm sure as mine is an excellent lens. Remember you do get AF and OIS for that $1.5K PL though.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2014 at 02:58 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

jdh99: This is a shocking development and a blow to Sony's E mount. Mount adapters always degrade image quality. Consumers shouldn't expect to have to adapt the mount

Mount adapters "always degrade image quality"? That's complete BS.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 19:38 UTC
In reply to:

marc petzold: I fear A7(R) customers could drop a screw onto the sensor, or better said the filter in front of it...and couldn't get the exact torque criss-cross onto the mount.

I'm wondering, does the A7 have the internal structure basis for being stable enough to support a all metal mount? the A7S does have it by design, but neither the A7(R)...and i mind have had reading before, the A7S front panel had been extra designed heavy duty to support a metal mount, and heavy lenses, especially.

Apart from that, good idea...but can't we just mount a A7S full metal bajonet then, without that silly saying "The Tough E-Mount" - which is really fugly for my taste...of course, when you've got a lens mounted, you don't see this. ;)

Further, i don't trust the Fotodiox brand that much - could they really produce a Metal E Mount within very slighty tolerances? I doubt it...and i'd say that mod will
void your warranty. As long as you don't know at exactly what specific torque you've to tighten the screws, too.

If someone doesn't know what they are doing with mechanical things such as this then they shouldn't be doing this replacement.

Worried about dropping screws on the sensor? Stand the camera up or upside down. Make a circular disk to fit inside the body to protect the sensor, etc., etc.
Worried about torque on the screws - learn how to tighten such flanges and get excellent tools.

Obviously this "upgrade" is not for every A7/r owner.

My A7R has absolutely no axial play and only a very slight rotational play that is consistent with all my other cameras.

If people are worried about mount strength someone should find a dead carcass of an A7 and pull/bend a couple of mounts to see if the plastic one in the A7/r is indeed inferior.

There is a lot of plastic to shear off in there and I'm not worried personally.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2014 at 19:34 UTC
Total: 318, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »