four under

four under

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Jun 25, 2011

Comments

Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (172 comments in total)
In reply to:

DaveE1: His "work has garnered a lot of attention in the past couple of years"...

I'm not surprised. Popular sites, such as DPReview, are posting his photos on their sites for no other reason than others seem to be posting his photos too. Nothing attracts a crowd quite like a crowd.

I wish I hadn't thrown away all my old photos that I thought were too bland. I could have been on this page :-)

Please define real photography.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 21:53 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

iAPX: Exciting!

I am switching to full frame since 6 months (bodies, then lenses, one by one); and plan to have medium-format within 2 years for portraiture.

645z is already available for pre order in Canada. (Henry's).

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 13:02 UTC
In reply to:

D 503: Why did she not have a gun ?

Yeah I'm pretty sure she would have pointed a gun at someone she thought was protecting her.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2014 at 18:11 UTC
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (332 comments in total)

OMG eh....I predict this one will be a great hit with teenage girls.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 18:04 UTC as 162nd comment
In reply to:

sh10453: Many of the images can't be described by words. Of course there is always room for "critique"; a professional critique, that is, for those who learned it in college.

Incredible captures of the harmony between the children and the animals, staged or not, regardless of post-processing, which, in some cases, may not have been suitable to everyone's taste. But it is her art, and her taste.
If you don't like her art, remember that not everyone likes YOURS either!

For me, many of these images really explain the meaning of "A picture is worth a thousand words"!

@sh10453

Well said!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2014 at 17:49 UTC
In reply to:

kimchiflower: Has anyone tried to shoot 1200mm at f/5.6 on a small sensor?

It cannot be pleasant.

Yep....I bet 1/3 of a stop makes a huge difference.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 19:08 UTC
On Happy Holidays from dpreview article (117 comments in total)

Merry Christmas everyone!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 25, 2013 at 13:07 UTC as 76th comment
On Nikon Df real-world samples gallery article (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: A nice camera, but way overpriced for what you get.

How foolish must one be to buy this camera in Europe where it is still $500 MORE expensive then a D800E?

This in a time where the dollar is worth just 0.65 cents to the Euro.

@ Shamael:
Enlighten me, why does a sensor "draw" any better in a mirrorless design?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2013 at 11:47 UTC
In reply to:

HBowman: That's not fair NIKON ...

Why is it not fair?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 17:33 UTC
In reply to:

Lab D: I can't believe how small the thing is! Imagine carring it in one pocket with a couple pancake lenses in another. With the 20mm F/1.7 it would be a great P&S camera to compliment a different micro four thirds camera.

It could be to me.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 21:57 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1514 comments in total)
In reply to:

Morpho Hunter: Looks great ...I guess word must have got around that Olympus's "retro" cameras are selling (why do other manufacturers copy, or should I say, try to copy what they do?) It will be interesting to see if Canon also copies ..er..innovates. I quite like the idea of a digital A1 or F1 (remember those, guys?)

Nikon had a prototype of a similar camera years ago. Apparently they feel the market is ready now.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2013 at 18:08 UTC
On Sony Xperia Z1 impresses in DxOMark Mobile Report post (17 comments in total)
In reply to:

jcmarfilph: In real-life scenario, only the 808 and 1020 should produce usable results. The rest of the phones will produce mediocre results at best.

Mediocre results would be quite a step up for some of the "experts " that plague the DPR site.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 21:02 UTC

I will be interested to see how much this actually brings at auction.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 01:08 UTC as 181st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Jim in Hudson: My recollection is the iPhone DID have a two-stage shutter button under iOS 6. First stage was touching the button icon and second stage (capturing the photo) was releasing your finger from the button. Doesn't seem that way with iOS 7 unless I'm missing something.

I just tried my iPod touch 5th generation with iOS 7.1 on it . Holding the shutter creates a burst on it too.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 20:57 UTC
In reply to:

Jim Evidon: To DPReview:

IMO, you are spending too much space on cell phones and other gadgets whose primary purpose is not photography.
Leave the phone and other gadget reviews to sites that specialize in those things and are better suited to review all aspects of he product. Cell phones may take amazing pictures for what they are, but they are not serious cameras.Better images are available from most simple and inexpensive point and shoot cameras. Please stick to cameras. That is what built your site and your reader base.

Given that there's many more people that use phones than "serious cameras" for imaging, I'm sure these reviews are of interest to a great many people. And really; how many "serious cameras" come along any more? Most "new" releases are just warmed over versions of last year's.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 20:53 UTC

There was a time I wouldn't have taken a Sigma lens for a gift. Those days are long gone though, they have some great products now.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 22:24 UTC as 37th comment
In reply to:

Sam Carriere: The simple answer to the question asked in this title is "nothing". Real photographers do not do serious work with phones.

@jcmarfilph.....anyone who insists that the Fuji HS series "superzooms" or any other "superzoom" has good image quality, really has very little room to criticize the output of any other device, be it phone or be it dedicated camera. Full disclosure: I do own a "superzoom". It's a fun camera, but at 11x14 print size, it's no better than my 5mp iPod.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 14, 2013 at 15:51 UTC
In reply to:

Joe Mayer: The iphone (note it's not called the icamera) is not of consequence to photographers. Photographers have cameras and not phones.

Any lousy snapshooter can use any camera and upload garbage photo any time of day too. What is it with you that anything you don't own is no good. Frankly, you should spend a lot more time learning a bit about photography, and a lot less time running your mouth.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 03:09 UTC
On Pentax Q7 added to our studio comparison database article (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: Pentax should really hire a good industrial designer.

Their cameras are good and perform well.

But they appear just freakishly ugly and out of fashion.

.

So just which cameras do you consider good looking and fashionable?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2013 at 01:13 UTC
In reply to:

jcmarfilph: Such an expensive toy that only a diehard fanboy will buy this one.l

You, of all people, talking about fanboys??? That's hilarious!

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 20:39 UTC
Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »