I made a benchmark between Iphone 4s and nikon coolpix 2200 of two Mpixels. In all the situation the results of the photos were better with Coolpix than iPhone 4S. The iphone 4S'S camera is poor of quality, expecially if you want to use at 100% of enlargment. The vantage of iphone 4S is that you always bring with you because is a phone and not a camera. Probabily if one use vary software it also possible obtain good photos with iPhone, but if you use a normal camera like for example the fuji x100, you can obtain more better vantage
I tried to compare Iphone 4s with nikon colpix 2200 of 2 Mpixel. Maturally colpix is more better than Iphone
rondhamalam: what?don't we have 24-120mm already?
From MTF Curve, the new lens seems better than the 24-120. Please go and see them
Leica now is non for photographers, bur for collectionists.....
Edmond Leung: Excellent lenses.These are real optical instruments, not toys.
I agree. I do not undestand why Nikon and Canon continue to buy at high price lenses made of plastic and with no mechanic control, when may years ago they built like zeiss.
There is a great possibility to develope the system. What Lytro has done at the end, is the holografy without laser and this is a great improvement. In the future I think Lytro will develope the system giving the possibility to take a picture of subject in the position it was in the past.
I think Lytro is a technology come from the future.I have bought shares of this company
what feedback if the original it is impossible to download?
Per me è una tavanata pazzesca
What is the need, if the sensor is so...small. The problem of compact camera is the sensor dimension, not they havefixed lens.For me is a stupid project
Good technical eye
I think the use of ND filters does not help the quality image, but worse it