halfwaythere

More so because the SLT is not a DSLR they shoud've included a mirrorless camera which was designed for amateur videographers.

A broader test is never a bad test.

Why wasn't a Gh-3 included?

Why wasn't a GH-3 included?

Truth, such a bitter pill.

Compared to this one it certainly is. :)

200k dot EVF and 230k LCD screen. Thats low even for 400$.

Good, decent post. Maybe a tad too optimistic. :)

I honestly don't see what the big fuzz is. It's an E-M5 with a grip, and apparently on sensor pdaf, which was expected. I think people are overreacting for the sake of overreacting. And again it...

The RX100 II is spanking some serious butt.

The RX100 II is spanking some serious butt.

In raw of course.

The globe picture is pretty impressive.

Very good quality from the kit lens and surprisingly good quality from sensor and jpg engine.

Thats pretty good for v0.3 firmware.

Thats clean.

For all DR measuring purposes you should compare iso 200 because that's the native iso.

The GX line was always supposed to be the stylish beefed up alternative to the GH top dogs. I think they realized while making the GX1 that it was a halfassed effort trying to convince the GF1...