wolfie

wolfie

Lives in New Zealand (Aotearoa) New Zealand (Aotearoa)
Works as a MS Excel VBA Programmer
Joined on Dec 1, 2003

Comments

Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (658 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: Compact, good lens, sensor larger than mft... this can replace my APS camera!

Unfortunately, just no HDR or panorama (although we have software to piece that together on the computer instead of in-camera) - but I don't use those very often anyways. Seems like a reasonable compromise.

If I owned this, I think practicality would have me reaching for this far more often when I step out than any other camera.

Before slagging MFT, check the studio scene for the MKII against any 16mp PEN at 1600 or 3200 ISO - Canon is totally blown away.
Pity as the lens spec is exactly what I'd want but the sensor performance is not even state of art.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2014 at 09:44 UTC
On P7190639web photo in wolfie's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

View it at original size ... enjoy

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 09:21 UTC as 1st comment
On Olympus PEN E-P5 Review preview (494 comments in total)
In reply to:

Troutguy: so, $1000 bucks for a camera prone to make blurry images.

and this wins a "silver award"? lol how about you scrap this "award" system , a camera prone to make blurry images deseves no award. period.

Hmmm -reminds of certain brand with purple spot issues that got high ratings somehow ... at least no sensor has to be replaced, just a firmware fix.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2014 at 08:03 UTC
On Shockproof flagship: Olympus 'drops' new Tough TG-3 article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

brumd: "File format: JPEG"
..and that's where I stop reading. Will there ever be a small rugged camera that gives access to RAW? I'd buy it immediately. Everytime a new shockproof camera is announced I'm hoping: maybe this time..
:/

Heck I stopped as soon as I saw the same old 1/2.3 sensor size ... at least Nikon had the b@lls to offer the AW-1. I think a lot of outdoors sports people would appreciate something with better IQ similar to a ruggedised XZ-2. In fact just stuff a decent sensor inside the TG-3 and it would be OK.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2014 at 10:18 UTC
On Shockproof flagship: Olympus 'drops' new Tough TG-3 article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

Simon Zeev: Nice camera, but for being a true diving camera seed to be water proof to 40m at last.

It isnt a "true" dive camera - it's a consumer trendy tough camera. Who would think a camera with a 1/2.3 sensor for $350 is a serious dive camera?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2014 at 10:13 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary article (535 comments in total)

Looks like a promising design - the zoom range and speed is basically all i'd ever want in a walk around camera, and if the AF is half decent, with a big sensor and the better dynamic range it is going to be on the short list to replace my G11.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 09:44 UTC as 128th comment
On Waterproof Canon PowerShot D30 dives deep article (34 comments in total)

More of same old same old - periscope lens and teeny weeny sensor= pathetic image quality. Is no one ever going to give us something better?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 09:26 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies

Should be the progenitor of a new genre for unpocketable cameras - heck I even wonder how it will do on a wrist or neck strap!

I think Sigma have plenty of important issues like battery life and operational speed, even maybe some WR capability, before trying to take on Hasselblad for outrageous designs destined to be self-sales-killers.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2014 at 04:42 UTC as 67th comment | 3 replies

Agree with so many others - when will a decent sensor size ever make it into a rugged camera - and get rid of the resolution destroying periscope lenses! It is the 21st century now guys!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2014 at 00:53 UTC as 1st comment
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1657 comments in total)

Wonder how good the body sealing is if the ports are behind a flimsy plastic door?
Any videos of it being splashed like the E-M1?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2014 at 07:12 UTC as 408th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

JustDavid: 'announced alongside two equally rugged lenses' - surely not 2m shockproof lenses :)

There is a video of a journo doing his own test and dropping on the floor @ engadget or gizmodo, I think.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 12:15 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirrorless Crusader: This is bound to be a niche product. A good niche product, for sure, but this isn't going to be a "regular camera" for many people when they could get the same thing for $300-400 less without the waterproofing.

And a good choice for those who don't want to be forced to stop shooting because of some rain, sand, snow or dust

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 12:09 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: hm... an o-ring between the body and lens to keep it waterproof to a depth of 15m? All it takes is one tiny hair to bridge that and your nice 1000$ camera goes blub-blub... Even if all users take good care of that (e.g. keep it greased or something), o-rings tend to wear out after some time.

Don't get me wrong, I think this is an exciting camra, and very much needed as proven by the rugged camera group test showed - surely this one will blows those toys out of the water (haha) in terms of image quality! Yet, I'm sceptical about it remaining waterproof for a long time... A fixed-focal would stress me less, but then again, even that seems unfounded if what Michael She says below is true.

Wow- ever hear about the idea that as the operator of a piece of equipment you take some responsibility to learn how it works and prepare it for use? Your "objections" are so typical of the lazy, do-everything-for-me attitude - maybe owning a camera is too much of a challenge for you - a paperweight might be more in your level of operational skills ...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 12:07 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

novak977: lovely concept but I would rather invest in underwater case for upcoming Full Frame NEX or alternatively Fuji (with their excellent low light performance). Large sensor is the key for good underwater photography or video. Just don't expect exciting results with your f5.6 Nikon lens - equivalent of f 15.1 on full frame!

Good luck hiking or kayaking or caving with your FF camera and 2kg housing!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 11:52 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

thx1138: Ok now Nikon has had the foresight to release a dedicated UW camera with relatively large sensor that shoots RAW and has the bonus of IL, how long before the numskulls at Sony, Canon, Olympus, Panasonic, Fuji, Pentax and Samsung wake to themselves. And if they do, how long will the AW1 have in the sun to shine and will it be enough to save the Nikon mirrorless ecosystem?

Whatever, this should have happened 3 years ago.

Totally disagree - as someone who takes a camera every time I fish, kayak, hike this is EXACTLY what I have been waiting for - something light, compact, better image quality than 1/2.3 sesnor tough cam that cah handle saltwater splashes, wind blown sand, rain and fish slime.
I bet when these reach the shops they will sell very well.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 11:49 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

CyberAngel: Snowboardiiiing!!!

Hah- this is the GoPro's competition now ...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 11:44 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

TFD: Not quite sure I understand the fuss about interchangeable lens camera that have no/few actually lens to change, for which you get to pay a premium price.

Not sure I would be submerging this camera either $$$

Have could it have "No lens to change"? - it has two underwater rated lenses if you actually read the article, and can use the other "normal" series 1 lenses and probably other Nikon lenses via the series 1 adapter.
Obviously if you don't intend to use it for it's purpose then why would you buy it? There is nothing else like it on the market - that's why it is causing a fuss. The alternatives cr*appy little compacts or bulky expensive housings weighing 1-2 kgs.
As for not submerging it -well, that says more about you than the camera.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 11:42 UTC
In reply to:

Pixel Judge: I am still waiting for bigger sensor, 1/1.7" or 2/3".

When, when, when will someone put a decent sensor in a ruggedized camera?? I have happy memories of using the Fuji HD-M film camera that was the forerunner of this genre. Why always the cr*ppy little 1/2.3 sensor? Believe it or not, there are outdoor people who want to take decent photos in low light situations like dawn, dusk or stormy, rainy weather.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2013 at 11:00 UTC
In reply to:

jmmgarza: How 'bout 9 minutes?

I think the cat steals the scene in the photo with her owner - that er-um author lady ...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 9, 2013 at 06:19 UTC
In reply to:

ogl: 150/3.6 equivalent of 135 format for 900 USD. Hmmm.

I don't think that 150 mm is PORTRAITS distance.

Hope you realize it is only F3.6 for DOF, not for exposures. This will be a great indoor event lens.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2012 at 07:27 UTC
Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »