Johan1967

Agreed.

You don't have to apologize for showing a nice picture.

I always react on you, because it is mostly pseudo-scientific blabla that you post here. How you can earn a title as "knowledgeable" is a mystery for me. It is impossible to have a fair...

AnotherMike always has a lot of text about Zeiss that doesn't make any sense. It is always the same: Zeiss is (sometimes not so) good but others (Nikon) are better. Serious photographers don't...

Hi Andrzej, I don't agree with the term "overprised". Just compare the Zeiss prices with the Nikon counterparts (when available) and you will see that the differences are not that big or just...

If you don't want to use any Zeiss lens, why do you care? Get a life.

Some people perhaps are Zeiss-fanatics, but you for sure are a anti-Zeiss fanatic.

I suppose you have troubles with your mood when you drink too much and then start posting on forums.

Sometimes it is refreshing to have someone with an opinion that is completely different than that of the "average" Nikon-user.

I have some Zeiss-lenses (including the ZF 100) and the Voigtlander 90 and 180. I would like to have the Voigtlander 125, but the out of the world prices kept me from buying one. The last few...

The lens isn't very sharp, has huge vignetting and massive CA. How can it get 4 stars for optical performance?

You always with your Zeiss-talk. I don't understand why you must talk about a Zeiss-lens that isn't in production anymore. Everybody knows (including Zeiss) that this lens was not good enough. They...

I have missed your open mind with some other lenses the last few years. And you know what I mean.

When I must pay such a huge amount for a 35 mm, the lens must be perfect. And apparently this one is far from perfect. The same is true for the new 28/1.4 and 85/1.4. These lenses cost an arm and a...