rusticus

rusticus

Joined on Dec 29, 2011

Comments

Total: 333, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Digitall: I think that from now on the Fuji will have difficulty selling the EXR sensor product to someone who is minimally informed about this fail.

Hello - the Fuji X-S1 also has the balls (orbs)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 20, 2012 at 23:01 UTC
In reply to:

frank_be: Today I shot a picture of ice parts on our gardenpond. I've experienced orbs and one orb even had an extra bright blue circle around it.

Shot at 1/160th, 28,4 focal length. I can't find the ISO on the Mac and I already erased the original from the SD card., but is was ISO 400 or lower. It was shot in P-mode.

I'm going to check with the shop where I bought my X10. I'm seriously thinking of returning it and look around for a replacement.
Low light AF is also below expectation. Even taking handheld outdoor pictures in wintery overcast conditions was very hard to do. I don't really know why this camera is supposed to be good in low light conditions. I really hope I have a bad example because I really like its looks and way of operating. But it hasn't convinced me picture wise.

I could call myself a Fuji fan, but with this kind of quality it's not possible to call myself a fan.

Edit: Firmware 1.03

I think, for ISO 200 and "ORBS problem" looks good

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2012 at 22:54 UTC
In reply to:

frank_be: Today I shot a picture of ice parts on our gardenpond. I've experienced orbs and one orb even had an extra bright blue circle around it.

Shot at 1/160th, 28,4 focal length. I can't find the ISO on the Mac and I already erased the original from the SD card., but is was ISO 400 or lower. It was shot in P-mode.

I'm going to check with the shop where I bought my X10. I'm seriously thinking of returning it and look around for a replacement.
Low light AF is also below expectation. Even taking handheld outdoor pictures in wintery overcast conditions was very hard to do. I don't really know why this camera is supposed to be good in low light conditions. I really hope I have a bad example because I really like its looks and way of operating. But it hasn't convinced me picture wise.

I could call myself a Fuji fan, but with this kind of quality it's not possible to call myself a fan.

Edit: Firmware 1.03

Here it would then also be ORBS - on the water, etc.?

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/648896439/photos/1729588/w22a

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2012 at 22:35 UTC
In reply to:

frank_be: Today I shot a picture of ice parts on our gardenpond. I've experienced orbs and one orb even had an extra bright blue circle around it.

Shot at 1/160th, 28,4 focal length. I can't find the ISO on the Mac and I already erased the original from the SD card., but is was ISO 400 or lower. It was shot in P-mode.

I'm going to check with the shop where I bought my X10. I'm seriously thinking of returning it and look around for a replacement.
Low light AF is also below expectation. Even taking handheld outdoor pictures in wintery overcast conditions was very hard to do. I don't really know why this camera is supposed to be good in low light conditions. I really hope I have a bad example because I really like its looks and way of operating. But it hasn't convinced me picture wise.

I could call myself a Fuji fan, but with this kind of quality it's not possible to call myself a fan.

Edit: Firmware 1.03

you mean this from @ sarkozy:

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/6127154653/photos/1754797/wm003

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2012 at 22:29 UTC
In reply to:

Francis Carver: Oh, Fujifilm... They still in business? What on Earth for, I wonder?

FUJI will they survive Mr. Carver - definitely

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2012 at 22:13 UTC
In reply to:

frank_be: Today I shot a picture of ice parts on our gardenpond. I've experienced orbs and one orb even had an extra bright blue circle around it.

Shot at 1/160th, 28,4 focal length. I can't find the ISO on the Mac and I already erased the original from the SD card., but is was ISO 400 or lower. It was shot in P-mode.

I'm going to check with the shop where I bought my X10. I'm seriously thinking of returning it and look around for a replacement.
Low light AF is also below expectation. Even taking handheld outdoor pictures in wintery overcast conditions was very hard to do. I don't really know why this camera is supposed to be good in low light conditions. I really hope I have a bad example because I really like its looks and way of operating. But it hasn't convinced me picture wise.

I could call myself a Fuji fan, but with this kind of quality it's not possible to call myself a fan.

Edit: Firmware 1.03

Sorry - I can not agree

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2012 at 22:10 UTC
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jostian: And now that the Firmware has done nothing to remedy the situation Fuji is VERY quiet... which I think sux! Just fix the sensor in new X10's and replace those in X10's already purchased... if you don't the damage (which is already pretty distinct) to Fuji's reputation is just going to increase exponentially, I wonder if Fuji have seen the Fujifilm forum on this site, its pretty scary at the moment, 90% of threads relate to the Orb issue and people are VERY unhappy!!!

The X-S1 also has the ORBS-problem

Direct link | Posted on Feb 16, 2012 at 19:38 UTC
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)

the X10 is a awesome Cam with a little ORBS-Problem.

There is no end of the world
only a small error in long-term recordings and direct recordings in reflected light

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2012 at 19:34 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

max metz: Really loving the Fuji x10 from when I first got it, a remarkable camera for the money, it takes beautiful images. The flaring characteristics are unusual in that they are circular, that's it, nothing I see is bad enough to justify all the fuss that's been created.

On the positive side the camera performs as if it had a far bigger sensor inside it, the dynamic range is stellar sand the low light capability impressive - its a beautifully made piece of gear and a joy to use.

the X10 is a awesome Cam with a little ORBS-Problem.

There is no end of the world
only a small error in long-term recordings and direct recordings in reflected light

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2012 at 19:34 UTC
On Möve in the Be The Sniper. challenge (2 comments in total)

thank all!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2012 at 00:47 UTC as 2nd comment
On Be The Sniper. challenge (15 comments in total)

thanks für Voting !!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2012 at 00:42 UTC as 2nd comment
On World Press Photo announces 2012 contest winners article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: I really wonder if those leaving the most immature and retarded comments would have posted if they had bothered to take a look at the series this photograph is part of. Fascinating to see such lack of humanitarian values and respect expressed by a large number of pixel peepers here on dpreview, a sad day for photography, for sure.

Do not go overboard, Mike

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2012 at 17:31 UTC
On World Press Photo announces 2012 contest winners article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reg Natarajan: I'm surprised we're not hearing from more gearheads worried about what lens he used and whether he shot using HDR. Whether you like the shot or not (and I do), I think everyone should take a second to realize that this photo would be no more powerful if you could see better what what was in the shadows, or if each hair on his head was individually discernible, or if the RAW image had more detail. Photography is only minimally about gear.

Brilliant photo, symbolic of a brilliant movement. May our brothers and sisters in Yemen soon be free.

Egypt is free??? You believ?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2012 at 17:30 UTC
On World Press Photo announces 2012 contest winners article (173 comments in total)
In reply to:

sarkozy: I think this is not real

Crap, why have not taken mine?

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/6127154653/photos/1735834/mekl

+1

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2012 at 15:49 UTC
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

frank2001: I found this page on Fuji's USA website but no download.
http://www.fujifilmusa.com/support/ServiceSupportSoftwareContent.do?dbid=881266&prodcat=234644&sscucatid=664260
When you click the link to "instructions" you get "page not found"
Anyone know what's going on?

see you:
http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/software/firmware/x/x10/index.html

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 16:34 UTC
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)

Unfortunately, the problem still exists after the 1:03

For me, no big deal, because I avoid subjects that can lead to ORBS
Nevertheless, a major annoyance

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 16:33 UTC as 45th comment | 2 replies
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)

I wonder about item 4

The problem is not only in EXR Auto mode
Fuji has been sleeping?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 16:30 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

frank2001: They must have pulled it?
All I see is version 1.2 on Fujifilm's site

no the 1.03 is available 5:15pm

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 16:26 UTC
On 'No Future in Photojournalism' Interview: Dan Chung article (278 comments in total)

'The arrival of DSLR video has been a great creative revolution and in the long run'

Yes!!!
I now use both: video and photo - and have no problem

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 16:13 UTC as 55th comment | 2 replies
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

David Clarke29: Whatever, I shall keep the X10 - HOWEVER I find it totally beyond belief that a company the size of Fuji could let a sensor design fault as portayed by the X10 pass acceptance by their quality assurance department.

The whole thing smells of commercial expediency and marketing pressure. This particular camera suits my shooting requirements but personally I will never again believe the marketing hype issued by Fuji or/and their accolytes again. Needless to say, further Fuji purchase is a no no.

Whatever, it is still an excellent "Point and Shoot" camera.

Yes!!!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2012 at 23:54 UTC
Total: 333, showing: 281 – 300
« First‹ Previous1314151617Next ›Last »