PIX 2015
RawDogg

RawDogg

Lives in United States Sunny - Bay Area, CA, United States
Works as a Hausmeister
Has a website at timfarrisphotographer.com
Joined on Dec 18, 2005
About me:

To have a much fun as possible with my Canon equipment.

Comments

Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Francis Sawyer: Canon: totally out of ideas, and detached from the world of photography and filmmaking. They're just crapping out one embarrassing product after another now.

I always wait to see what people have to say about Canon's New products. It never fails to see someone bashing them for lame reasons. Give It A Rest.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2013 at 05:24 UTC
On Dpreview Users' Poll: Best Camera of 2012? article (1509 comments in total)

I can't vote. I haven't used any that are listed. I feel as if you need to have used at least 2 of the listed cameras to give an honest vote, otherwise you're just voting for your favorite brand name.

Tim

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2012 at 05:29 UTC as 585th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

toomanycanons: I've never used ACDSee. Anyone want to comment on this update as opposed to, say, Lightroom 4 or CS5/6, if they're even comparable.

There are 2 things that ACDSee does and light room doesn't do well...well at least 2 things for me.

1. The batch editing is the best Resizing, Watermarking just to name 2 in that area.

With lightroom all the photos have to be the same res or the watermarking does not work correctly. Not with ACDSee.

2. The Healing tool. I can remove scars, and long streaking marks or items from ACDSee easier.

With lightroom you can not click and drag the healing tool. You have to do spot by spot. With ACDSee...just click and drag to remove long scars, streaks across and image (sky, ground). I use it to reshape something.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2012 at 00:51 UTC
In reply to:

Clint Dunn: Wow...I totally forgot about ACDSee....haven't used it since the very first version.

It's even better than before. I've been using it sine version 1.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2012 at 00:38 UTC

I just upgraded...Now it will not read my RAW files from my Canon EOS M. ACDSee 5 did but not 6. What's that all about?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2012 at 00:37 UTC as 20th comment
On Breaking the Rules article (142 comments in total)
In reply to:

jsis: Tips for better photos according to dpreview members:

Rule #1: get a Canon or Nikon camera
Rule #2: get an L or pro grade lenses
Rule #3: constantly upgrade whenever something new comes out

lmao. That is very funny.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 13, 2012 at 00:52 UTC
On IMG_0899-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

Next time don't shoot it with the Exposure comp. set to -2.33 for a night shot.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:38 UTC as 2nd comment | 3 replies
On photo in sample gallery (6 comments in total)

Next time don't shoot it with the Exposure comp. set to -2.33 for a night shot.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:38 UTC as 2nd comment | 3 replies
On photo in sample gallery (4 comments in total)

Exposure comp. -2.33. Wrong setting for low light.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:36 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On IMG_0897-ACR photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

Exposure comp. -2.33. Wrong setting for low light.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:36 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On IMG_0890 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Still don't get this one. you are still shooting in minus Exposure comp. -0.67...Why?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:35 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

Still don't get this one. you are still shooting in minus Exposure comp. -0.67...Why?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:35 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (11 comments in total)

Now it's set at -1.33 for a low light shot...Why is this?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:33 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On IMG_0868 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (11 comments in total)

Now it's set at -1.33 for a low light shot...Why is this?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:33 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
On IMG_0853 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)

Why is the Exposure comp -2.33 in a low light situation? Can someone explain this to me. Is there a reason you would set it so low in low light?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 1st comment | 6 replies
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)

Why is the Exposure comp -2.33 in a low light situation? Can someone explain this to me. Is there a reason you would set it so low in low light?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 1st comment | 6 replies
On It's official: Galaxy S III mini post (3 comments in total)

People with small hands can't handle the S3...they need a Mini.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2012 at 03:58 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

gl2k: Nice that Panny gives customers a feature that Canikon users already enjoy for many years now. LOL.

To limorenko: I didn't mind that it has no built in flash. I kind of like that. I was use to it from the 5D cameras I've owned.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2012 at 18:59 UTC
In reply to:

gl2k: Nice that Panny gives customers a feature that Canikon users already enjoy for many years now. LOL.

OK...I see your point. Well I sold my 5D mark II because I wanted to do a major downsizing in equipment. I know the image quality was not going to be like the 5D, but I wanted a good camera. I've been happy with all my other Canon cameras purchases the past (all dslr's).

I'm getting out of the photography business, (too time consuming with a full time job and an 8 year old who wants to play all the time) but I wanted a camera that took great pics of my son. He does Track and Field, Trampoline, Gymnastics, Mountain Biking, Kayaking, etc...just an active guy. I wanted to go the mirrorless route. I really thought this would be a good choice since it is basically and compact T4i. (as canon is basically stating) I think I better do some homework on this one. Don't want to make a bad choice and it looks like I almost did just that.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2012 at 18:56 UTC
In reply to:

gl2k: Nice that Panny gives customers a feature that Canikon users already enjoy for many years now. LOL.

To Mescalamba:
Why do you think the EOS-M is laughable. Just want to know what's on your mind. I was thinking about purchasing it. It has the same sensor as the 4Ti which got a good review.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 27, 2012 at 20:46 UTC
Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »