tex

tex

Lives in United States baltimore, MD, United States
Works as a Artist, visual arts professional
Has a website at www.texandrewsart.com
Joined on Nov 22, 2003
About me:

Working artist [photography only one aspect], MFA. Began photography 1978 (1967 as a kid), 35mm, MF and LF photography, darkroom. Independent curator, art wrangler, fine arts repro photographer, appraiser; former collegiate gallery director, former program director for an alternative space, 10 yrs undergraduate teaching, 2 yrs chair of the department; Exhibits specialist at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Former supermoderator of the late Lightcrafts' LightZone forums. Co-founder and webmaster of The LightZone Project, www.lightzoneproject.org

Comments

Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15

Last time I looked, at age 18 you're no longer a minor in the U.S., so (if he was 18 at graduation...) "barely 21" doesn't cut it AFAIC. I would also say his parents ofr guardian(s) have been a bit remiss in inculcating him with a more refined sense of right and wrong. I wonder how he'd feel if someone decided to just help themselves to his computer, smartphone, or car----or anything else that he owns. Sheesh.....

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 11:57 UTC as 62nd comment
On National Park Service bans drones in Yosemite article (170 comments in total)

I think a better solution would be a permit process allowing for only so many permits per area of the park, maybe with some areas off limits, only on select days. It could be made very restrictive---such as one day a month, which could be posted for all to see on their web page and at the park entrances. Also, in the event of a crash, if the users don't retrieve, then they are billed the full amount of retrieval, not matter how much it costs. Decibel levels could be set, plus all sorts of other restrictions.

When I think of some of the other stuff that goes on in the parks, it seems to me a saner drone policy is called for---neither completely open or completely closed.

The very best thing to do in the national parks, btw, would be to close all the roads.....bike, foot, horse, mule, llama, and electric bus/trolley/tram travel only. I've been to more than a dozen, and motorized vehicles are by far the most deleterious and obnoxious things in the parks (besides humans, that is....)

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2014 at 08:13 UTC as 74th comment | 1 reply
On 1939: England in Color (part 2) article (170 comments in total)

Just wonderful, both parts. I spent a year in England (mostly Yorkshire, Harrogate for school, my mother at University of Leeds on a Fulbright) in 1966-7, when I was 10. This was also when I had access to my first camera. Still as vivid as yesterday to me in my mind. But even that England is long gone now...

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2014 at 20:35 UTC as 82nd comment
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2278 comments in total)

The iPhone of cameras.....beautiful design, feature set running behind the best offerings in the market.

Leica=Apple now?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 16:08 UTC as 594th comment

8th question down, on physical size and quality: That Nikon is doing focus groups with consumers that are this stupid is not a good sign for Nikon. Nevermind what it says about the idiocy of average American consumers....
As others have stated, if Nikon wants to stay where it is, #2, it needs to be thinking more out of the box and doing focus groups with a more refined set of consumers of their products---and their critics. Furthermore, they should be extremely circumspect in drawing conclusions about the mirrorless market in the U.S. There are a lot of moving parts to the U.S. market that I bet are not being considered here---and don't draw conclusions based on the Nikon 1 series, for starters. Does anyone really think that if Nikon had produced something like the A7r it wouldn't have been a smash hit? It's already a big hit (critically, and initial production runs were too small for the unexpected demand...) and it's a Sony!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 17, 2014 at 13:31 UTC as 165th comment | 2 replies
On Using third-party lenses on Sony Cyber-shot a7 / a7R article (490 comments in total)

An exceedingly odd article. Rather surprised it got past vetting (if there is any). Far too personal to be of much real use to people. It's not just the funky lens bit; more troubling is the part about how difficult it is to manual focus. The article's comments about the difficulties strongly suggest someone who has spent more time with AF than manual focus in all its manifestations: viewfinder, rangefinder, ground glass, TLR, SLR with eyepiece or without (as in some medium format) . I am perhaps very wrong about that, but those of us who cut their teeth with cameras long before decent AF and can remember all sorts of problematic manual focusing (and with this camera it's truly easy to manual focus),and are probably all scratching their heads over this one; somewhat evident by the comments and "likes". The "criticisms" in this article read much more like a chronicle of personal ineptitude. I certainly hope something this idiosyncratic doesn't find its way into the real review.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 00:45 UTC as 128th comment | 4 replies
On Using third-party lenses on Sony Cyber-shot a7 / a7R article (490 comments in total)
In reply to:

harold1968: Wait a minute, these are rubbish lenses (vivitar!) using rubbish adapters (except the Novoflex) on a sensor that gives Zeiss and Leica a hard time.
Is this article for real ?

Uhhh, not really Barney!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 00:06 UTC
On Classic photographs recreated in Lego article (123 comments in total)

DPR seems to be putting up some pretty questionable "news" items lately, like this one. Perhaps they need a separate column for this sort of thing, and the news feed roll can be kept more ....orthodox.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 12:51 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
On Site update: two new forums article (32 comments in total)

So, are we to assume there's now also a DPR drone (or the moderators, perhaps) working to exile...ahem, I mean properly situate...complaints/suggestions posts and "technical" posts to their respective forums now? Looks like some work has already been done there....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2013 at 03:58 UTC as 20th comment
On Ten one-of-a-kind cameras from the 21st century article (248 comments in total)

An interesting if, ...eccentric...list. But no question that there are some worthy picks here. And I'm very glad to see the Oly E330 here, the original "solution looking for a problem" per DPR's review of old. Notable in this list is the predominance of Sony and Oly---"outsiders" that needed to innovate relentlessly in order to compete with the big two---and we are all better for it now. As for omissions or changes---well, we all have our opinions I'm sure. I would have picked the Oly c8080, perhaps the first digicam to give startlingly good results, and a model for the R-1, and the end of the line in a way; and also the Epson RD-1, definitely a one-off, but a harbinger also. Honorable mention goes to the Oly E420/620, the first "pocketable" dslr's and harbingers of Oly's press towards mirrorless (as was the E330, in retrospect).

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 13:02 UTC as 92nd comment | 1 reply

I've come to the conclusion that a high (higher than the general populace) percentage of "photo enthusiasts" are on the autism spectrum, probably Asperger's, and this accounts in large part for the intensity. I'm not being facetious.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 03:34 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies

Ummmm....not a super helpful gallery, imo. I have no real sense of how that 10-18 is performing at all. Please just let's have some dull, but instructive, test shots at all apertures. They don't have to be bench quality at this stage, but something more than this, surely. No offense or disrespect intended.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2012 at 13:37 UTC as 19th comment
On Bibble Labs purchased by Corel article (51 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zimu: It may be the doom's day for me. As I am a Linux user.................

Hey, TexJoachim---

LightZone's not quite dead : www.LightZombie.org
And I disagree with the posts about Corel. Is there a better photo editing software out there for the price than PSP---which can often be had for $60? Is there a better paint program than Painter? None that I've seen...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2012 at 17:54 UTC

Wow! 4 intelligent comments right off the bat. I'm surprised and positively impressed. Perhaps photography enthusiasts are in fact finally coming to understand what the rest of arts practitioners and viewers have understood from the get-go.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 28, 2011 at 18:55 UTC as 31st comment
On PhotoPlus Expo 2011 Report article (10 comments in total)

Well, it's about time!!!! I've been waiting for years for you guys to cover this show---it's really a great show right in NYC----only one of the largest metropolitan areas in the U.S., which in turn is in the middle of the densest population concentration of the U.S.

The biggest surprise of this show: the size and extent of the Sony area, the third largest stand at the show. Yes, the Canon booth is larger (it's always the largest) but they're also showing printers. The Nikon stand is the next biggest as usual, but this year has a lot of empty floor space. Sony's stand by comparison is packed tighter, and when I was there on Thursday, had 2 demos/shoots and one presentation going on simultaneously almost all day. not only that, the products counters had people stacked up 3 and 4 deep---more like what Canon and Nikon used to be like. one more interesting note: I heard a rep tell someone who asked that they didn't bring any of their P&S cameras.

Amazing.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2011 at 18:45 UTC as 3rd comment
Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15