be nice... Blizzard named a wow zone after him
That's what happens if you don't sweep the floor
Re: superzooms, I think it is a selling point to say 10x or 20x zooms and I tend to think the smaller the zoom, the better the lens.Still, the huge size of this lens shows it's not just a marketing camera
I don't have a dishwasher, can I just put the gopro in the sink and push it around with a brush.
I already have a smartphone in which I don't use the camera but use a 'real' camera.I'm interested in the camera but don't need another phone.It does allow the telcos to be part of the distribution but can I get one without having a phone plan?If I want to use the Nokia 1020 or some advanced imaging device I buy a phone I don't use or make yet another switch to another phone plan.But an advanced imaging device can be connected to some communications system or use WiFi.I'm thinking, will there be small computers carried by people which will handle imaging and communications and avoid the need to cram it all in one device.The Google modular phone seems to be a step in this direction where camera modules are swapped on a chassis which has a phone and so on.
maybe have an unboxing of a blurry object and then substitute with the Next Best Thing in the last frame.use for everything
Small cameras with non removeable primes can be fine tuned but the future is with cheaper lenses and sharpened with software. I hope camera makers don't pass off the cheaper lenses as more expensive ones, but DXOMark might show those up.It's an interesting thought that a cheap prime can have the CA and the other defects compensated by faster processors.Sure this lens optimisation is already happening with mobile phone sized lenses and can be scaled up to SLRs.Also as we move away from the 'tyranny of 35mm film' lens sizes and sensor sizes will reach a standard size similar to MFT but it's a format war at the moment.I think of cars as a parallel as they take on the areodynamic 4 cylinder and mostly look the same.The full frame SLRs and lenses were really a sop to film experienced pros and will soon be the new 'large format' as there will always be a need for full frame for the boutique pro market
After I realised I had two of everything, egCanon 5D mkII and mkIIItwo iphones 3GS & 4two ipads 2 & 3and a few more examples, I apply a 'hit the wall' rule. I ask myself if I have hit the wall or have I reached a limitation of the equipment I have.It helps me pause and think.The turning point was realising there was very little difference between the iphones and I won't do minor or incremental upgrades.
I thought the trick which Canon at least have is something like a strip of sticky tape on the bottom of the sensor to collect internal dust.presumably this strip is replaced when the camera is serviced.I dimly recall sometimes emulsion and particles of film would collect inside the camera. Again cleaned out as part of a maintenance plan.
I have the f/2.8 variety and sometimes it can be heavy and sticks out. This lens would be less noticeable.I would prefer this lens to the f/2.8MkII.
However I'd have to try it out in the shop first.
The narrator of the AF one sounds like CHuck Westfall
Guidenet: Great article. Thank you. So many don't consider a single light as studio lighting or try Strobist when a single monolight might be a better alternative so Kudos for this. This type of thing just helps people think about getting into a home studio situation or even carrying a single monolight with a battery pack on location.
So many think you have to start with three, four or five lights. I started with two and have over six now, but don't use them all very often. Many times I take only one and a reflector into the field.
Again, Thank you and Kudos to DPReview and Thomas Park for a great job.
I recently read that a light is best for movies and stills photographers should use a strobe.So does it come down to opinion and experience and that the choice is a situational thing?I imagine that you would have to take test photos with a strobe setup but lighting would be easier to visualise.
jorepuusa: It´s great that professional photographers teach amateurs how to shoot. Then amateurs start taking pictures cheaply or pro bono and pros lose their jobs.Pros go to schools, four years photography there and then they buy expensive gear and use money to get clients. And then some of them teach amateurs in web which causes the profession to collapse, that has happened all over and photography is a dying profession.
I am not a pro but I have roughly the same gear as a wedding photographer but I photograph birds and railway objects and old buildings and I know that I don't have the skill to do a wedding.I recently took photos of a friend's cat and it was brought home to me that the results were not very good and I know nothing about WB and lighting and I have been experimenting with a grey card.But I know not to give up my day job.
mick232: The solution would be easy, even without WTO doing anything.
Sell the camera with a 30-minute limit and make available an updated firmware that removes the limit.
"Making available" can be anything from an official download to accidentally "leaking" the firmware.
Does the law affect me in Australia? There's probably some agreement somewhere.Could I elect to pay this tax and get an authorised firmware update?Might affect resale possibilities.
itsastickup: In the long run I would expect the duty to be applied to cameras also. This is a naive view of taxman behaviour. This is a bad move that is likely to cost us.
strange that it's a European tax which affects me in Australia. And it's based on an assumption that we will record movies in cinemas.Last I heard, original movies are leaked days before release and would be a better quality than a crude cinema recording with the heads of cinema patrons on the bottom.
LaFonte: Ok rhetoric aside, one thing I don't understand, why there is actually a higher duty tax for video cameras? What is the purpose of this?
It wouldn't be subtle to take a DSLR like the Canon 5D mkII into a cinema to record the movie.Would I sell enough to make up the cost?In the past, colour reproduction devices had to pass treasury regulations about copying money, but it doesn't seem to be a problem now.My thought is that there is a different tax regime for video cameras and it is not a money grab by all manufacturers.
Joseph S Wisniewski: There are several cameras that seamlessly start new files every time a 4 gig file fills. That "concern" is a non-issue.
There really aren't any concerns about cameras overheating, either. Build it for liveview, and the heat producing display and processor pretty much run full time anyway.
is the heat from the backlit screen? If I was recording a car journey or something that doesn't require the camera to be moved then could I not dim the backlighting?
Daryl Cheshire: The Canon 5D Mk III will start a new file on reaching 4GB. But the 30 min limit remains. What I want to do is record car journeys which can exceed 30 mins.I don't know if this limit exists in Australia and I'd like to pay the extra tax if there is a firmware option. But it seems to be a European tax which affects the whole world.This is similar to the (no longer applied) tethering restrictions placed on the iPhone because of an agreement with AT&T which affected the world distribution and encouraged jailbreaking.
the iphone 4 was blocked from tethering by Apple until iOS 4.3 was introduced with personal hotspot. It only worked on the IPhone 4 or later. Jailbroken devices had no restriction.
The Canon 5D Mk III will start a new file on reaching 4GB. But the 30 min limit remains. What I want to do is record car journeys which can exceed 30 mins.I don't know if this limit exists in Australia and I'd like to pay the extra tax if there is a firmware option. But it seems to be a European tax which affects the whole world.This is similar to the (no longer applied) tethering restrictions placed on the iPhone because of an agreement with AT&T which affected the world distribution and encouraged jailbreaking.