Sandyramirez

Sandyramirez

Lives in United States City, NY, United States
Joined on Jun 18, 2009

Comments

Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Serious Question. How many of you shoot Medium Format or would switch to Medium Format if the right camera body was produced?

I shoot MF currently.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 22:06 UTC

How does this affect current CC subscribers?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 14:42 UTC as 124th comment | 4 replies
On Pentax announces Q7 with larger 12MP BSI CMOS sensor article (232 comments in total)
In reply to:

DDWD10: I love my original Q... it's a shame the Q10/Q7 has gone all-plastic. Bleh. The solid magnesium build of the Q was one of the things that made it feel so "special" to use.

Having actually held one I can tell you it still is a great metal body

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 03:47 UTC
On Leica teases 'Mini M' for 11th June release article (304 comments in total)

Mini M? Isn't that that the M-E?

Direct link | Posted on May 23, 2013 at 16:46 UTC as 121st comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Ricoh GR preview article (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

RFC1925: Looks like a winner. Hopefully we'll get a proper review this time.

I wonder what's next in the Ricoh pipeline. An updated GXR body would be great.

Actually I think the GXR body is fine. They just need a new M Module

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 20:40 UTC
On Just posted: Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM lens review article (182 comments in total)
In reply to:

doctorbza: You mention that the Canon & Nikon counterparts are weather sealed. The Canon 35mm f1.4 is not weather sealed.

The Canon 35/1.4 L is weather sealed. All L series lenses are

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2012 at 17:45 UTC

And folks complain about Leica's cameras! So basically a rebadged NEX-7 for about the price of a Leica M and about a $500 more than the M-E, both of which are Full Frame units.

While I am not usually one to complain nor really much of a gearhead, even I have to scratch my head at this. While folks complain that Leica is trying to cash in on their name, this is definitely a case of that.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 18:47 UTC as 290th comment
In reply to:

Nathaniel George Weir: fixed lens... I don't even know what to say about that...

How about saying "Damn! Finally a Digital Hexar!" If you are so much of a fauxtographer that you need a zoom then don't buy it and go make your fauxtographs with something else.

The actual photographers that will use this are dancing for joy

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 05:51 UTC
In reply to:

tommy leong: i like the idea
BUT not the price....

SONY you can't keep coming with great ideas
and poor execution.
EVENTUALLY, you will run out of steam

We are discussing a Full Frame camera with a Zeiss 35/2 lens right? Last time I checked before this camera that was a bit more than the $2,800 Sony is asking

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 05:49 UTC
In reply to:

miwo76: I always found it weird that m43 lenses have updateable firmware. I bet this will be fixed by a firmware update to the 20mm f/1.7.

Doubtful. The 20/1.7 is a Panasonic product, and they have no real incentive to help Olympus out here. The lens probably performs like gang buster on a Lumix body BTW. No this will require Olympus to come up with a solution

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2012 at 19:29 UTC

Most likely an APS-C version of the M with a rangefinder system seen recently on the M9 Titan. Possibly some plastics involved to make it more affordable, but I doubt it highly. Guessing it will come in at say 3000-4000 USD.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 14, 2011 at 03:10 UTC as 79th comment
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11