inevitable crafts studio

inevitable crafts studio

Lives in Austria vienna, Austria
Works as a 3d
Joined on Jun 24, 2011
About me:

iam building an analog drummachine right now

http://inevitablecraftslab.wordpress.com

Comments

Total: 608, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On October 22nd to be a big day for tablets post (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

jcmarfilph: So what's new in this iTab? A 15 years technology with a camera sensor tinier than a pinhead and crammed with more pixels? Still no USB, no card reader, no real multitasking, 100% more expensive than competitor's tablets?

whats the system latency of android again ?

its 2013 and you praise a touch device with 150ms input latency because it has windowed multitasking?

so you could watch youtube while surfing the net ?^^

exciting..

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2013 at 22:40 UTC
On October 22nd to be a big day for tablets post (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

KariIceland: A big day for tablets? Not really, just a mini upgrade if any, i have really started to question the integrity of those running the connect part of dpreview. So much "apple is amazing" articles here while they go "meh android is here, nothing amazing"

thats because they look at tablets more from a professional side then soccermum "but mine was cheaper" consumer type of people

easy as that

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2013 at 22:33 UTC
On October 22nd to be a big day for tablets post (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shamael: I have an android tablet that performs like a dream, with hdmi output, with a classic usb port, with a 64 gig sdx slot, and it was available with 8 gig base memory for 115$ in 9 inch format.
The same in 9.7 inch format is 135$. So, in what does apple now wants to revolution the market? I will buy an Archos 13 inch tablet soon, for 220$. I have it up to the throat from this "mini" scrap. My next retina android with 10.1 inch is 220$. Is there not here a lesson to learn for apple?

if you wanna buy a new plastic tablet everytime another company brings slightly better hardware, then go ahead, buy your androids for 200 bucks ^^

i have my iphone 4 for years, my ipad2 ditto, it still runs the latest OS and all apps, has absolutely no hardware flaw, no scratch no nothing.

an OS should be as much in the background as possible, with easy accessible clearly structered system preferences.

everything else is done by dedicated apps.

and for me thats perfectly implemented in ios devices.

i dont care for animated backgrounds and which softwarecompany had it first.

i care for magnesium alloy, and having as less open holes as possible.
on a laptop and handheld devices.

i also prefer breakout cables in soundcards.
most plugs standards are faulty by design.
headphones plugs always break at some point, so i rather have a super failsafe plug like the new apple connector than a usb port for exapmle.

why is there never an android bashing when they release something ?^^

Direct link | Posted on Oct 12, 2013 at 22:28 UTC
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: Is apple in such a bad shape that Ive needs a second job ;)

no its about taxes for both of them ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:51 UTC
In reply to:

Yanko Kitanov: Still far from the Fuji x-series, sorry I also own a legacy Leica, but past was past and present is now and carries its facts

what has the one thing to do with the other ?

this apple leica is far from fuji x
and legacy leica design was past and present is now ?

but the x series is an oldschool design too, you know that right ? i mean a classic leica design is the nearest brother to the fuji x design. so how does tat fit together ? ^^

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:49 UTC
In reply to:

CFynn: The silver and black Hasselblad 500 c/m was a beautiful camera design - very functional too.

true

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:45 UTC
In reply to:

babalu: Rangefinder Camera. So, where is the ocular piece to look through ?

you use screw on diopters with leica Ms mr wiseguy

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:42 UTC
In reply to:

fad: I photograph in the streets of downtown Manhattan, around SOHO. A camera this stylish would be very practical for blending in and being accepted.

The camera we will use today is an ugly piece of retro mechanical equipment with a user interface only it's mother can love and software that is careless and no joy to use.

Let us hope that camera designers learn from this effort.

fad, you cant be serious ^^

i never ever met a wannabe thats so deeply honest and naive telling me that he is a wannabe. a guy that seriously wants to blend into an artist community by impressing them with an artsyfartsy leica cam.

oh my god now i get why people talk about leica owners like they do sometimes.

sorry dont want to offend you but as you like it to be like that i guess youre not offended anyway hehe

edit: sorry, another thing is you think using unobstrusive pro gear compared to lets say this leica makes you a wannabe ? i mean, seriously? no kidding? ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 20:36 UTC
In reply to:

photogeek: I think it's mostly Newson. Newson has also ruined some Pentax cameras in the past in a similar "childish" fashion. Ive probably regrets getting mixed up with this at all. If it was mostly Ive, there'd be just one button and a giant touchscreen on the back, and it'd be precision milled out of a solid block of unobtainium.

exactly

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 11:02 UTC
In reply to:

Alec: I think much of the irony (and ire) expressed by actual photographers on this topic is valid. But I also thought from a purely design standpoint and specifically using this designer duo's own design dialect, this is not a very eloquent design.

If you are looking for clean (to the point of eliminating a hotshoe):

1) What's the point of having a frame around the display on the back? It would look visually cleaner if the textured surface wrapping around the sides of the camera simply gave way to the patch of smooth/flat aluminum on the back around the display.

2) Buttons to the left of the display are inconsistent with the control to its right and the two buttons on the front. They should rest on the textured field same as all those. This will give symmetry of the display frame. Buttons should have symbols on them not text next to them. Use those design skills to come up with crystal clear, laconic symbols.

3) Can the bindi between "LEICA CAMERA" and "MADE IN GERMANY" be any bigger?

i m de one too for an x2, but a lot more tool approach then toddler

http://inevitablecrafts.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/leica-x2-mockup/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 11:00 UTC
In reply to:

AlanG: This is just superficial surface work. A good designer would have figured out how to incorporate a high res EVF.

a great designer that mainly steals bauhaus styled ideas (which i like) that should redesign a bauhaus design-classic like a leica m could do better than that.

i like everything jony ive designed until this leica, probably its because the edges where marc newsons idea, i dont know

technically its boring, ditch the hotshoe on a leica that needs OVFs with wideangles is just plain stupid, sorry.

i know its just for charity but as a designer, arent they proud enough to deliver the best possible product ? ^^

instead of ditching the hotshoe why not the lcd?

i once made an x2 mockup, which probably isnt the best design too, but at least it stays true to the camera^^
http://inevitablecrafts.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/leica-x2-mockup/

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2013 at 17:52 UTC

wow the round edges are ugly, the didnt get the design idea of a leica at all.

and the pentax guy .. come on ...why did they let him in this project anyway ?

i hope they raise some money, probably they are SO clever that they allready know that people witht hat mich money have bad taste ..

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 20:57 UTC as 66th comment
In reply to:

fad: I photograph in the streets of downtown Manhattan, around SOHO. A camera this stylish would be very practical for blending in and being accepted.

The camera we will use today is an ugly piece of retro mechanical equipment with a user interface only it's mother can love and software that is careless and no joy to use.

Let us hope that camera designers learn from this effort.

that was sarcasm ..

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 20:54 UTC
In reply to:

Alexander St: Camera for women. Not functional for serious work. Marc Newson should do this work alone...........

i could if you want me to ..

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 20:50 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

kecajkerugo: why so many people is talking abouit the tiny FF? Real prof. use larger format and Pentax got it: 645.
For advanced amateurs the APS-C is perfect and the m4/3 can be even more.

pros use what they get for the job ^^

and also no one that earns his money with it (=pro) would either use a phase one for news journalism or an omd for a fashion shooting.

using the word "pro" as an arguement is foolish anyway

look at all the bad photos we see published everyday in newspapers up to fashion magazines, just everywhere we look and see a bad photo, its done by a pro ^^

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 17:47 UTC
In reply to:

Blindphoton: Just think if the Fuji X Pro 1, X20, or similar had NIKON stamped across the top. They'd be absolute winners (note, clearly they are already wonderful - I have both). If Nikon coupled its technical expertise with its old rangefinder aesthetics it would be on to an absolute winner.

thats too late, nikon is still too much in the pro market.

if they would start that trend it would be ok, but while others copy their own classics to make news nikon still produces new classics with their pro cameras.

i mean i think thats how they see the classics trend.

if they would make a new nikon rangefinder i think it would be more designed like a j1/v1 then an actual classic nikon rangefinder.

they are too proud to copy themself and obviously too proud to take some of the competitors ideas even if they are good and people are asking them for it hehe

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2013 at 09:37 UTC

nikon, would you please make a body like the j1 with a standard centered hotshoe and ricoh GRs featureset?

i dont care if its a classic rangefinder design or a modern design as long as it has the looks of the j1 or probably the v1 but i would prefer to use different ovf with every lens.

make a set of primes and special lenses, where is the tilt shift adapter for fmount?

better video, just give us hdmi out and 50mbit and all good :)

i LOVE 1" and super16

i bought a used v1 with 10mm for 250 € a few days ago to replace my gxr 28mm, and i absolutely love it, going to buy the 32mm for sure.

a superfast 85mm nikkor with 45mm closest focus in my pocket with superfast AF is so perfect that all th other problems are none to me :)

people loved or love the ricohs even they lack fast af or good video, and the potential hardwarewise is allready there, i guess they could solve all the critics with just one firmware upgrade. i bet they use it on their private cams hehe

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2013 at 09:24 UTC as 28th comment
In reply to:

Tal Shachar: the man holding the statue is blurred, it would be more impressing if the photographer used narrow aperture so both would be in focus. Most photographer think that its always good to have the bokeh effect, but it really depends on the background.

and now my respond for the technology:
it seems to me that this technology will also be used for characters in 3d animated movies (maya, daz, poser,blender, iclone etc.) so in future animated movies you will not be able to tell if those are real actors or animated characters based on photos of actors

the first paragraph is funny :) you upgraded from your first camera (galaxy note) to a bigsuperprozoomer last month didnt you ? read about aperture values right ? ;)

about the technologie respond, hehe did you even get whats the point of this ? taking photos as textures or scan reallife models for games is standard for more then 15 years already. the renderengine makes it realistic looking not the phototexture or the model

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2013 at 14:02 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (476 comments in total)
In reply to:

lmtfa: Their are more "CONS" listed here than their are in Pelican Bay Prison. And it still gets an 81% + Gold Award. So it has been decided by those in charge, make a "Retro" looking camera and name it Fujifilm and bingo it's a world class winner. I wish I had my Brownie that I got from Kellogg's Corn Flakes box tops. It surely would garner a 83% and don't call me Shirley:-))

i hope this was a sarcastic statement and you all fell for it hehe

otherwise i must be daydreamin ^^

facedetection ???? seriously ?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 21:36 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (476 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: At base ISO I really couldn't see how this camera had any better image quality than the Olympus OMD. If you stick the excellent Panasonic 20mm F1.7 lens on the Olympus or the upcoming Panasonic GX7 you would have the same image quality(or Better) for about the same price.

The biggest difference is that you could also then have an interchangeable lens camera. I don't think that the X100S is a bad camera. I just think that the fixed lens compact category offers no benefit over an interchangeable lens compact camera.

@mpgxsvcd : are you sure you got the concept of a fixed lens camera, or should this be somehow sarcastic ? ^^

also i think you didnt get the concept of the x100 at all

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 21:31 UTC
Total: 608, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »