inevitable crafts studio

inevitable crafts studio

Lives in Austria vienna, Austria
Works as a 3d
Joined on Jun 24, 2011
About me:

iam building an analog drummachine right now

http://inevitablecraftslab.wordpress.com

Comments

Total: 607, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On What if historical figures had Instagram? post (20 comments in total)
In reply to:

KariIceland: This is filth at its worst, SHAME on you connect, you have become pure filth doing this article. Filth is what you post & filth is what you are.

are you serious ? ^^

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2013 at 10:40 UTC
On Camera roundups 2013: What to buy and why article (286 comments in total)

whats the difference between "take control, small but serious and moving on up" ? its three times the same category ^^ 3rd and 5th too..

but i agree with them there is no other way of making 6-categories of kinda the same consumer field.
but its six weeks to christmas, and dpr is owned by you know who :)

and the only class of buyers that dont know what to buy are upgrading consumers ...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 24, 2013 at 10:35 UTC as 103rd comment
On Rare photos of Rolling Stones emerge from estate sale article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: I got as far as number 7 before deciding that if I'd taken them they would have gone into the bin and never been seen by anyone!

wow hugo, so mature.. youre so great

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2013 at 10:00 UTC
On Rare photos of Rolling Stones emerge from estate sale article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mescalamba: That Kodachrome.. sigh.

Other than that, pretty portraits I would say? Very decent, I think whoever made them knew rather well what they are doing. They have certain "something" indicating that it wasnt just "any photographer". Somehow familiar style, just cant remember where I saw something like that..

Nice discovery anyway.

probably someone took the photos or they where developed after the band left, and no one cared to send the pics

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2013 at 09:58 UTC
On Rare photos of Rolling Stones emerge from estate sale article (106 comments in total)
In reply to:

aguirre2013: Can someone tell the focal length of these photos? I would guess 35mm. What do you think?

i would also say 50-85 its pretty compressed for beeing that near to the subject

Direct link | Posted on Nov 18, 2013 at 09:52 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Homam: Can't believe there is so much negativity already! No one actually knows what the camera is!!! Let's not forget Canon still holds the record when it comes to best-selling cameras, and let's not forget Canon was the first to introduce DSLRs, was the first to introduce Video in DSLRs like 5dMII which revolutionized the DSLR market and took digital photography to another level...

Well I suppose Canon know what they're doing. If you don't like or need the new camera that Canon announces you'd better stick to what you already own...

who cares who introduced stuff first ? ^^

canon: 200.000 employees
nikon: 12.000 employees

canon was and will always be Nr2 :) its true canon was a bit quicker to jump on dslrs and digital in general, but the since the d3 the nikon tank started to roll over canon again :)

iam 33 and a nikon user since i was 8 (Fe2) so iam a "bit" biased hehe

canons including their pro mocels are always a bit too much like a tv remote too me

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 18:07 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Edmond Leung: Only FF please. Dont introduce a toy!

whats up GWB? he is right, and also if canon starts a campain like nikon did to introduce the Df and its obviously a consumer body, and canon makes their own sensors...

what edmund wrote is completely true, make it ff or stop presenting us the same cameraconcept of halfbaked plasic dx bodies with crippled featuresets every 6month.

and stop advertising it in campains like that one

i bet its a real cheap ff consumer camera and by real cheap iam talking about below 1k

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 17:43 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: Dear camera makers, we don't want a new camera. We want the current one to work and when the newer model arrives, we want it to be different, better.

I feel like we are being served the same warmed up soup every six month now ..

yep but that started years ago

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 17:37 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (257 comments in total)

the wider shoulder on the right side is a typical effect with 3d cloth simulation.

otherwise if it would be to silky you clould easily guess the form, what they didnt want us to i guess

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 17:35 UTC as 33rd comment
On Nikon Df preview (2816 comments in total)

i like the looks as i love my fe2 and fm3a, and besides the looks, this camera is what will replace my d700 in a few years.

what i dont like is the weight the size and the backside of the camera. same like the digital leica m series

for me back to the roots, in leica and in nikon ways, would mean

raw only
no menu
no lcd

no added thickness to the body, if you need more space because of sensor thicknes vs film thickness add it to the mount not the body.

i dont want to feel the added thicknes. i wouldnt care if for example the new nikon would have added 5mm to the "cylinder" to which the mount is mounted.
if you add 5mm to the bodys thicknes like leida does it, it feels strange in my hand

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 12:05 UTC as 339th comment
On Nikon Df preview (2816 comments in total)
In reply to:

NCB: Ken Rockwell said "The Nikon Df is small, light, tough and intuitive" . That sums it up nicely. It won't appeal to people who think their plastic CSCs are the bees knees, or that their iPhone is the only way to take pics now. It will appeal to real photographers who go out to get real top quality pics.

ken who ???

dare you talk about "him"

the damon ...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 01:05 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2816 comments in total)
In reply to:

_P: I don't know... Mixed emotions... Simply stunning sensor with just about perfect pixel count. This is huge advantage maybe even justifying initial price point. But at the same time it also is just a tool and as such it ether can be a transparent and non-disturbing executor of my photographic ideas (wasn't it advertised as such?) or a pain in the neck... How exactly am I suppose to change exposure compensation keeping Nikon Df with 70-200/2.8 hand held while still looking through the viewfinder? Should I higher an assistant to address that strange need?

@shamael,thats like saying a kodak film is better so a nikon with a kodak is better then a canon.

as a system you cant compare nikon to anything else in photography. that counts for every ff nikon f mount camera, thats the bonus of never switching mounts, whether you like it or not.

and the d4 sensor is the best nikon f sensor so far no matter how equally good a m43 picture looks

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 01:01 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2816 comments in total)
In reply to:

Deardorff: Over TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS???

Nikon is greedy.

@shamael: as lomg as the yen stays stable iam ok with everything hehe

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 00:57 UTC
In reply to:

KariIceland: No, it gives you BLUR not depth of field.
There is a difference between hardware and software, the software can NOT replicate the hardware.

gaussian blur can never look like unsharpness caused by lenses, no matter how good you mask it

it might look ok in some situations but as soon as you get hard edges and contrasty object that should be blured you can see whats going on

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 21:58 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

aeschylus: If you've a desktop computer and conventional screen I struggle to see the point of manipulating images on any tablet. Better to use the former and then transfer them.

oh god i knew i should talk about prices hehe

ok lets say the laptop is 900. my laptop is a 2009 first aluminium macbook 13" that was around 990 or so

but on this laptop is way more material and data, let alone apps.

i use timemachine so i could restore everything, but still, i feel better to take a small device with me then a relatively heavy macbook.

also if you drop a computer its a different story then dropping an ipad , spray of water, same story.

i know a lot of people dont get the idea of breakout cables, but if you consider working in "not that clean" or outdoor enviroment it makes a lot of sense

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 19:15 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kim Letkeman: Ah yes ... the usual dichotomy. People who believe in using only the right tool for the job and who take their photography very seriously slag the whole idea of editing on a toy (and yes, I still find tablets to be toys because of the form factor more than anything else.)

And the rest fall anywhere along the continuum of totally inexperienced to experienced but willing to sacrifice editing power for the perceived convenience of using a tablet and defend the concept with the usual litany of "you have never tried it yet you have an opinion" ...

Luckily, this perennial war of mismatched skills and expectation drives traffic on these sites ... :-\

your two categories are off or biased for you and your friends probably ^^ :)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 19:05 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

drh681: Presuming a Photographer uses an I-pad.

no, it also presumes he/she shoots digital and has full batteries on both devices and the camera conection kit with the right usb cable

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 19:03 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

chrisnfolsom: These are photography aps - not professional image processing aps... They are incredible for what they are - not for what they aren't. Just as you wouldn't necessarily take professional pictures with your ipad neither would you process those images - although they are getting pretty good, and I have heard the quality of the actual LCD is highly rated.

And also, as a tool for your clients with all the WiFi connectivity and even more immediate gratification they will want to see images immediately so there will even be pressure for the professional to use an ipad for at least some pre-processing and presentation.

i think its a matter of workflow

clients want to see stuff on the "big" screen instantly, but they also wanted it on the cams LCD when we where switching to digital.

every digital artform has the same problem where there might be the time where you have to tell the (unpolite) client "sorry i wont show you unfinished products, its a policy"

workflow wise it strongly depends on the amount of pp your work needs.

the fact alone that with a computer i have one hand for position one hand that has a keyboard with physical keys for "blindfolded" shortcuts and a screen at eyelevel makes a computer superb compared to any touch tevice, thats for sure

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 19:01 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

Morpho Hunter: I can't think why I would ever attempt to successfully process a photo using ANY tablet "computer" ..it just cannot be done.

Cheers,

http://www.normanday.net/for_your_amusement

I can't think why I would ever attempt to successfully process a photo using ANY tablet "computer" ..it just cannot be done.

thats more then "raw coverting" editing for large prints or whatsoever.

he is just not able and already knows he might be in future to successfully process A photo using ANY tablet computer.

to call this guy "closed minded" is very polite i guess

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 18:55 UTC
On 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad post (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

cknapp61: For those of you not shooting a Full Frame DSLR and routinely making 16x20 inch prints or larger, I suspect these "toy" tablets with "crippled" "Apps" instead of real software (layers, masking to replace green-screen backgrounds, fine editng at the pixel level, etc.), are sufficient.

For reference, in additon to shooting with a DLSR, I still shoot B&W film 35mm-4x5 inches, develop it myself, and make prints up to 16x20 inches in my traditional "wet darkroom" as I have done since the mid 1970's. For some, quality in a no-compromise propsition.

and your film references do what to your arguement?

right, they kill it

and i own two mamyia bodies AND i have a regular dark room in my flat, so therefore i might decide for you if it makes sense to upgrade PS to the creative cloud

Direct link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 18:49 UTC
Total: 607, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »