wlad

wlad

Lives in EU
Joined on Sep 16, 2010

Comments

Total: 225, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Relio is a powerful LED light in your pocket post (26 comments in total)
In reply to:

InTheMist: Is there something like this that accepts an actual battery? I could use this.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=18650+xm-l2+t6+flashlight

Direct link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 21:18 UTC
In reply to:

Tom Goodman: Wow, a new twist in contests. For my part I won't enter this one, but should they ever announce a contest in which the prize is a chance to just sniff the camera I'll be there!!

you know, if you win this contest, you can sniff the camera as well !
It's like 2 first prizes in one !

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 22:23 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Huh? Win and you get to borrow a camera!

Is this the worst contest ever? Surely they can afford to give one of the things away....

maybe the person in Hasselblad, who thought that selling rebadged Sony cameras was a good idea, got a new job

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 22:19 UTC
In reply to:

GSD_ZA: Hasseblad are well aware that there are enough idiots in the world to make this re-branding and uglification worthwhile for them.... or are there?

They are closing the rebadging studio.

Which proves that Hasselblad wasn't smart. They were stupid - the customers were smarter than they thought they would be.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 26, 2014 at 08:34 UTC
In reply to:

AdamT: It`ll never win a beauty contest, the A7 series always had the appearance of the EVF hump stuck on as an afterthought but this looks like something is missing on one side .. whatever , IBIS is a good move if it works as well as Oly's 5 Axis does

to be fair, it still look better than the Nikon Df

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 08:03 UTC
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (386 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: When I was 20, I would have killed for a Leica, but now that I'll be turning 65 in a week, I find, oddly, I have absolutely zero interest in owning a Leica. I don't need a beautiful, well built, reasonably competent, digital camera that is obsolete within 2 months of its release.

I feel I can get by with an uglier, less well built, but still reasonably competent camera that is obsolete within 2 months of its release.

Besides, most of my friends who would likely be impressed with my owning a Leica are either dead or confused by my inability to give up the passions of my adolescence. A couple are just confused.

My new E-M10 will likely last until I'm dead. And after that, it won't matter much, will it?

@HowaboutRaw - please educate me - which of the old Leica lenses matches for example the 35mm Sigma Art lens in resolving power ?
And please don't give me any of that "magical characteristic feel" a picture will suddenly get as soon as you realize it was shot with an overpriced Zeiss/Leica glass.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 17:32 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photoman: Wait till Sigma release their 85/1.4 lens. 1/4 price and better quality, like their 50/1.4 ART lens.

@Jones, that "junk" glass from Sigma performs better than "original" glass from Nikon and Canon. You are right that there is no guarantee that a Sigma lens will work on a Nikon body released in 10 years from today.

There is however a 100% guarantee that this Carl Zeiss Otus lens will NOT autofocus on anything ever.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 16:50 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photoman: Wait till Sigma release their 85/1.4 lens. 1/4 price and better quality, like their 50/1.4 ART lens.

Jones, it's more like a Ferrari vs a Mercedes C63 AMG.

Both are crazy fast, but one is a better status symbol, because it costs 5 times as much as the other.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 12:42 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: Are 85's really known for problematic distortion?

it's simply not such a huge problem as you try to make people believe - otherwise pros would buy "apochromatic" Zeiss lenses instead of Nikon's/Canon's pro grade gear.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 10:57 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: Wide aperture portrait lens without AF at 4.000+ $/€ price... pffff. Brainless! Really wish to see comparison between this lens and 85 1.4G and what buyers pay with 3.000+ $/€ extra!?

A point and shoot shooter will never consider buying either a CaNikon 85mm 1.4 lens, or this Zeiss, so in this regard, he is pretty much irrelevant.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 10:51 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: Are 85's really known for problematic distortion?

someone is obsessed with chromatic aberrations to justify the price tag - everybody else just checks the checkbox in LR to take care of that

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 09:18 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: The lens on my iphone 4 is better than this. Plus it functions as a phone.

both

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 09:16 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photo Pete: Can't wait for the Otus 600mm f4.0. I've heard the price will be really competitive!

to be fair, considering its price, you surely can afford 3 assistants to accompany you for the rest of your life

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 09:15 UTC
On Zeiss introduces 'no distortion' Otus 1.4/85mm article (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: Wide aperture portrait lens without AF at 4.000+ $/€ price... pffff. Brainless! Really wish to see comparison between this lens and 85 1.4G and what buyers pay with 3.000+ $/€ extra!?

Nope. CZ 85/1.4 vs Nikon/Canon 85/1.4 is not the same as a DSLR vs P&S.
It's the same as an overpriced Leica rangefinder vs Sony a7R.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2014 at 09:01 UTC
In reply to:

G3User: The demise of pro paid photography continues. Now, any soccer mom can have out of focus backgrounds. Again, another reason not to hire a paid photographer. Pro photography, RIP.

right, because everybody wants to have the same boring background on every single picture

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2014 at 22:23 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Uuuuuuuuugh I'm so sick of seeing those drones everywhere!!!
It's just a stupid fad for rich people who don't know what to do with their money!!
It's totally useless and also dangerous!!!

@Tord: We were talking about "those drones everywhere" - not this particular model. Of course it will cost a lot more than a toy.

It's a lot cheaper to build one yourself.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2014 at 07:07 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Uuuuuuuuugh I'm so sick of seeing those drones everywhere!!!
It's just a stupid fad for rich people who don't know what to do with their money!!
It's totally useless and also dangerous!!!

I thought Britain banned them, or was it France? Anyway, if it gets out of control, all it takes is an air gun to shot them down.. you don't need a license for that :)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 08:32 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Uuuuuuuuugh I'm so sick of seeing those drones everywhere!!!
It's just a stupid fad for rich people who don't know what to do with their money!!
It's totally useless and also dangerous!!!

@Will Macfly

I live in Europe.
Here's a toy quadcopter for 38 EUR:
http://i.imgur.com/94XmBT8.png

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 08:22 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Uuuuuuuuugh I'm so sick of seeing those drones everywhere!!!
It's just a stupid fad for rich people who don't know what to do with their money!!
It's totally useless and also dangerous!!!

rich ? you can get a toy drone for < $50

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 08:04 UTC
On Drone lighting could be coming soon to your studio article (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stephen McDonald: Just wait until one of those blades cuts off the model's nose. Of course, that couldn't really happen. Who ever heard of an electronically-controlled device that didn't perform perfectly?

Those tiny plastic blades have no weight and rotate at slow speeds, I don't think these would be capable of cutting anything beyond grass.
A real RC helicopter with 650mm carbon fibre blades would be deadly.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 08:00 UTC
Total: 225, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »