bakhtyar kurdi: I know this is like religion, no logic will help, but I ask photographers to do a simple thing, download the picture of the flag that has no shadow, then open photoshop, then file, open as, camera raw Now move the exposure slide all the way to the right, you will see clearly that the flag was been selected,then pasted as a perfect rectangle shape, then they darkened the extra areas or brushed or whatever to blend it to the rest of the picture, but unfortunately they forgot to make shadow for the flag on the earth(studio or moon) , and don't forget, this is after 2 million times of editing so that they don't leave any signs of mistakes,so how do you want me to accept the rest of their lies?The flag has been added later to another picture that also been faked in studio .
You're right. No logic will help you. You are a fool.
Smitty1: It would have been interesting, to me, to have had a couple similar Pentax bodies in the DR comparison. Especially since Pentax was referenced in the review a couple of times.
Hopefully the top LCD panel catches on to more entry and mid tier bodies across brands as it can be a really useful feature. But I'm sort of shocked Canon hasn't introduced Weather Sealing at this point on these.. esp since a 300 dollar K-50 has it.
Glad to hear that, Richard. I've been looking forward to the K-S2 review.
Tip: when shooting propeller airplanes, use a much slower shutter speed to avoid that awkward stopped-prop look that makes it look like the engine's quit.
Massively, and badly, Photoshopped. What a joke.
fisherman_lol: To DPR Moderators; This jpino79 guy is been flooding this forum all day with his inflammatory comments and you are not doing anything about it? I think if he was bashing CANIKON he would be banned for life. ;)
390 comments as of now, and most of them from the amazingly narcissistic jpino79. I wonder what goes on in that guy's noodle that makes him need to troll Pentax-related articles.
madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.
madeinlisboa, by deleting your history, for one. Why on earth do you delete that? It's THE LIST you're asking for. If you have a hard time keeping track of your edits, you can always use the Virtual Copy function and go nuts on that one.
madeinlisboa, you're doing it wrong.
Hugo is correct. Just check your history. You do not need to navigate through the filter menus.
PhotoKhan: I said this many years ago, I'll repeat it now for the benefit of avoiding any more future hassle.
The sooner any professional or advanced amateur photographer who rely in Raw output starts using LR and exploring it in order to get the amazing potential it entails, the sooner you'll be doing yourself an huge, mind-peace-inducing favor.
This has been my method since I first installed Lr. It works great and gives me huge flexibility. I export full-size uncompressed JPGS for importing to iPhoto. LRs export presets make it simple to send out JPGs for Flickr, email, Facebook, etc. I use iPhoto strictly for organizing and sharing photos with my Apple TV. I won't be using Photos at all.
SmilerGrogan: Is there a way to "hide" iPhoto from my system so that the update won't delete it? There are times when I need its functionality....and it sounds like Photos won't do it for me.
Wilcy, I've heard the same thing (haven't updated yet). But read this: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55640206
So you've installed Photos and you cannot share photos from your Mac to your ATV locally? Just via iCloud?
jwd8002: With the release of this software AppleTV (the device that connects iTunes to home TVs) users can no longer connect to their photo libraries on their computers, rather connection is only available with their photos in iCloud. There is a monthly charge to store >5 gig in the cloud. Thus we see blatant (and I believe illegal at least in Australia) price gouging by Apple. Very poor show Mr Apple, ripping off consumers through market manipulation is not nice.
I discussed this on the Mac forum here just the other day because I had heard this exact same thing, and it seemed to be confirmed by Apple support. But one poster has contradicted this, saying he's able to share photos to his ATV just as before: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/55640206Have you found this out from your own experience or is this something you read elsewhere like I did? (I haven't installed the update yet.)
iudex: Eagerly waiting for the complete review. The competition already posted the review and it was very positive, enthusiastic about the camera:http://www.ephotozine.com/article/pentax-k-s2-dslr-review-27269#VerdictHowever the reviewer is a Pentax user himself, so I better wait for an impartial review by DPR.
Another review here: http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/pentax_ks2_review/
Mike FL: The zoom seems has BAD QC issue as always:
Mike FL, what is the point of this comment and what does it have to do with this article? You choose to show only the 1-star, negative reviews. Why not the 36 out of 52 reviews with 4 or 5 stars?
Nice understanding of the definition of "macro."
Better start selling off the kids so I can afford one of these!
Zeisschen: Pentax is the only DSLR maker that manages to pack it's technology in a modern looking industrial design body. Canon is 10 years back, Nikon around 15-20 years...
If I went with a DSLR, for sure i'd be a Pentax
jpino79, Zesschen obviously prefers modern looking industrial design AND image quality AND reliability.
David Hurt: Who would want a camera that color????
yesman12: I go to the Consumer Electronics show every year. This year I ran into someone from the Photography industry and he claimed that DP's Affiliation with Amazon does skew its responsiveness to reviews towards brands that are most popular on Amazon. to be clear he was not claiming that DP's reviews are biased but that they have a brand filter wrt what and when they decided to review.
DP should have reviewed the 645Z. Nearly all the other web sites have.
DPR is becoming less and less relevant when compared to other photo news & review sites. It's very clear what drives traffic here: the forums and the comments. Why is DPR is generally several days behind sites like Petapixel when it comes to reporting news?
Prognathous: Hopefully for the K-3 replacement they adopt a centered articulated screen, and not the selfie-oriented side-hinge design. There's a good reason all* >$1500 cameras that offer an articulated screens keep it centered.
* By "all" I'm referring to Pentax 645Z, Nikon D750, Sony A99, and the new $1500 Samsung NX1. I'm not aware of any camera of this caliber that uses the side-hinge design.
Prognathous, you are totally overthinking this.
timo: There's some more constructive and informed coverage at Imaging Resource.
No kidding! Head on over there for a good solid preview minus the usual DPR snottiness.