Hachu21

Hachu21

Joined on Jan 18, 2012

Comments

Total: 45, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

So the DCwatch interview was true : http://canonanswers.com/818/canon-full-frame-mirrorless-and-new-lenses-in-2014/
Can't wait the new body with viewfinder!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 09:12 UTC as 20th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

saralecaire: Sony just stop all this "innovation" nonsense and learn the basics of at least maintaining a single lens mount which consumers don't have to worry about changing...

"Canon have two mounts as well,..."
Three mounts.
A new EF-M has been annouced yesterday! ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 08:44 UTC
In reply to:

Hephaestus: Plastic mount. Not mentioned in the release, and not mentioned by dpreview, but it is plastic mount (and metal body). Rather strange decision - the remaining three EOS M lenses have metal mounts.

Very thin metal housing... EF-M lenses have a plastic body.
The metal mount of the 3 existing ef-m are screwed into the plastic body (just like the Zuiko "pro" lens for µ4/3).

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2014 at 23:37 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

SeeRoy: When the VF's "popped up" there's an empty space in the camera which it occupied when it was "popped down". So why not integrate it in the first place? Less vulnerable mechanical complexity. Gimmick.

Because of the screen maybe? (free space is needed inside the camera but on the back too...)

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 11:02 UTC

Heavily photoshoped fox... Nice work but why?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2014 at 17:22 UTC as 1st comment
On Samsung NX mini First Impressions Review preview (562 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hachu21: What's the point to make interchangeable lenses on a small sensor if they are not faster than the RX100 series???

"Its Wi-Fi connectivity and flip-up LCD suggest that it's aimed at a socially-driven user, someone who wants concert photos and pictures of friends and isn't too concerned about changing settings."
So i doubt it will be interested in swapping the lense...
"The 'selfie'-loving, socially-driven user is not likely to care whether the lens comes off or not "
+1

Another strange concept... designed better for asia market?

They are not... RX100@50mm is f/3.5.
So, only the announced 17mm f/1.8 is faster.

I like to see companies trying new ways... but unless their optic quality is way better than the sony, i don't see the selling point.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 21:45 UTC
On Samsung NX mini First Impressions Review preview (562 comments in total)
In reply to:

badi: min shutter speed - 1/16.000 ... that is interesting... i wish i see something similar in other mirorless.
For example i use my X-E1 with a 50/1.4 lens + speed booster, and i can't use it wide open during a bright day (min ISO=200, min shutter=1/4000).

Screw-in an ND filter ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 09:20 UTC
On Samsung NX mini First Impressions Review preview (562 comments in total)

What's the point to make interchangeable lenses on a small sensor if they are not faster than the RX100 series???

"Its Wi-Fi connectivity and flip-up LCD suggest that it's aimed at a socially-driven user, someone who wants concert photos and pictures of friends and isn't too concerned about changing settings."
So i doubt it will be interested in swapping the lense...
"The 'selfie'-loving, socially-driven user is not likely to care whether the lens comes off or not "
+1

Another strange concept... designed better for asia market?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 09:19 UTC as 116th comment | 6 replies
On Judge strikes down fine against drone photographer article (127 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hachu21: All those flying devices CAN BE open and moving BLENDERS.
Following the link below you can see a compilation of skilled modelist injuries.
WARNING! Pictures reported here can be shocking.
http://puget3d.over-blog.com/article-accidents-corporels-images-videos-choquantes-85307431.html

Just to clearly show that thoses flying devices are not TOYS.
They have to be controlled by skilled people in a safe area.
Or secured by any technical trick.

@jtmon : are you really that the small 10 000+ rpm propellers can not cause injuries? I saw a quadricopter flying around with an EOS 7D + 24mm... I would'nt be there if this 4 or 5Kg flying machine has to fall.
Since I d'ont see a way to secure this enough, i think that drone use in heavily populated area (i.e. cities) should be avoided.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 18:02 UTC
On Judge strikes down fine against drone photographer article (127 comments in total)

All those flying devices CAN BE open and moving BLENDERS.
Following the link below you can see a compilation of skilled modelist injuries.
WARNING! Pictures reported here can be shocking.
http://puget3d.over-blog.com/article-accidents-corporels-images-videos-choquantes-85307431.html

Just to clearly show that thoses flying devices are not TOYS.
They have to be controlled by skilled people in a safe area.
Or secured by any technical trick.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 11:14 UTC as 16th comment | 4 replies
On CP+ 2014: Things we found that had been cut in half article (107 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank_BR: It seems that there is a lot of interest, but little information available about how these cuts in half are made. I believe a viable technique could be using what is called "wire saw", where a metal wire impregnated with an abrasive powder (diamond, for example) slowly cuts the workpiece. More information here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_saw

another video where you can see how to cut 100µm thick sillicon slices! (in english at 2:40)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtPZMUhR-oI&feature=youtu.be
Impressive mechanic technology used in almost all our electronic devices.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 08:21 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Things we found that had been cut in half article (107 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andre Benschop: Hi All, The cutting technology used is a trade secret and Yes, it is VERY time consuming to make a really nice model.
Lots and lots of technical challeges to be tackled.

One of the most interesting challenges is make a 90 or 120 degree cut out and keep a lens (partly) functional in terms of moving parts (i.e. without the darn thing coming apart). Been working on it for some time now.

Check techunveiled.com if you're interested.

Thanks for the -limited- info.
Want to know more now... :)
But I understand the trade secret.
Roughly, how many hours to cut a "simple" lens?

A big impressive cutaway here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wn1EFLa2C8

Direct link | Posted on Feb 17, 2014 at 17:26 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Things we found that had been cut in half article (107 comments in total)

Don't be sad for those. I guess they are all non-functionning samples. Why?
Because all parts should have been glued together before cutting. If not, each half part cannot stand up like that. they should fall appart.
What do you think?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 17, 2014 at 14:24 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On CP+ 2014: Fujifilm stand report article (30 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bervilat: What a cool flash unit on the X-T1. How Canikon have nothing like this?

canon ex-90 flash unit maybe?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 16, 2014 at 10:38 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Canon stand report article (59 comments in total)
In reply to:

FBoneOne: After shooting canon for over 20 years this is quite underwhelming. They make good cameras but they stopped making exciting ones a while ago.
I can remember signing up for canon when the first IS lens came out - changed my life. Or the Eos 3, although the eye control did not work so well, it offered so much of the 1v at a fraction of the price with amazing AF for the time and outstandingly accurate light measure - much better than my Eos 1N.
Or the 540ex flash, the first really reliable wireless multi flash system.
I just miss a time when canon made me feel that they were advancing photography with huge leaps.

The last time i felt that way was looking at pictures from the Nikon D800e... Or the Leica M Monochrom.

Might be nostalgia hitting, but I wish canon would wow me again.

Nokia, kodak, Rim... well you can list them all but canon seems to me a different story.
Fact :
In 2013 Canon is the third american company regarding patents claiming. And since few years now.
All companies included, not just in photography buisness.

Yes, they drive their buisness very carefully, in a opposite way from Sony, but if you look at the whole picture, Canon seems a lot stronger than Nokia was.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 17:26 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Canon stand report article (59 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lawrencew: Here in the UK it is interesting to note that the pre-order prices of the Sony A6000 (£729) and the Olympus OM-D E10 (£599) with kit lenses are both lower than the G1 X II (£749). And that is before you even add the price of the EVF to the G1 X II making it £949.
You can argue they are in different segments, but for anyone just about to spend circa £700 on a new compact camera (i.e. none DSLR) the Sony and Olympus offer fantastic VMF for the feature set they offer in comparison.

"and pack in more features and functions, and dials, and..."
wich ones? except for the integrated VF and a bigger MP count, what did thy have to offer you won't find in the GIXII?
(real question here, no troll.)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 17:11 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary article (534 comments in total)

Max apertures dug from official Canon samples Exifs:
24mm => f/2 (we allready know)
31.1/33.7mm => f/3.2
39.4mm => f/3.6

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 10:53 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary article (534 comments in total)
In reply to:

Maxim_C: This little guy might make me come back to the fold...
That lens is very tempting. I just want to know what is the aperture at about 50mm (equivalent).

Max apertures dug from official Canon samples Exifs:
24mm => f/2 (we allready know)
31.1/33.7mm => f/3.2
39.4mm => f/3.6

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 10:53 UTC
On Waterproof Canon PowerShot D30 dives deep article (34 comments in total)
In reply to:

lightrider: Canon has dropped it's pack.

Sony experia, with raw capabilities from android 4.4 is a more capable underwater cam than this. A cell phone.Yes canon, all you have going for you here is the label on the body that used to stand for something. If you ever want to start trying again, I will be happy to buy. Good luck with that.

A bit exagerated but not totally wrong :
Sony Xpéria Z1 :
•20.7 MP 1/2.3 Exmor RS CMOS sensor
•F2.0 lens
•1080p/30 fps video
•HDR video

but
- 1.5m for 30min wateresistant only.
- no optical zoom

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 14:30 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary article (534 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mark9473: The camera ticks all the boxes for me, provided it lives up to IQ and handling expectations. But a big let-down is the appalling battery life. Any chance for an after-market solution offering better battery life? Or will we just have to get used to carrying 4 or 5 spare batteries?

4 or 5 spare? That's around 1300 pictures. You plan to go on a week-long trip without any power plug?
In case of wilderness trekking, you may be right.... :-/

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 09:58 UTC
Total: 45, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »