Marcelobtp

Marcelobtp

Lives in Brazil Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Works as a Student/photographer
Joined on Nov 26, 2010

Comments

Total: 144, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Dat music...Made me don't want this product.
hahahaha!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2015 at 16:36 UTC as 9th comment

The best of the 4 compared about noise and detail at all of the ISOs, very good, i was not hoping for it.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 24, 2015 at 02:17 UTC as 20th comment
On Nikon D7200 First Impressions Review preview (859 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: I would like to know, why anno 2015 a camera manufacturer would launch a product with USB 2.0 and not USB 3.0 (3.1) is already on the market, just to remember. What are the implications, why seems to be so dificult?
Is that expensive? The MMCards manufactures are imposing to not do it?

Thx plamensio, even though nikon already launched d8xx series with usb 3 so the problem should be solved for them, i guess there is something else other than driver problems.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 23:37 UTC
On Nikon D7200 First Impressions Review preview (859 comments in total)

I would like to know, why anno 2015 a camera manufacturer would launch a product with USB 2.0 and not USB 3.0 (3.1) is already on the market, just to remember. What are the implications, why seems to be so dificult?
Is that expensive? The MMCards manufactures are imposing to not do it?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2015 at 04:56 UTC as 99th comment | 2 replies
On Opinion: Canon EOS 750D and 760D article (318 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hadarmil: OMFG! A rear dial on a low end camera body! How did they manage this feat of engineering for so low a cost?

hahahaha!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2015 at 20:24 UTC
On Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L article (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

maadfw: This lens just made Nikon 14-24 a Standard zoom :)

I don`t understand why people want to say that lens is better than the nikon one, first point we don't have a review yet, second point they are diferent lenses as i stated later one is F/4 and the other F/2.8. if the 2.8 is compensated by the stretch from 14 to 11mm, is a subjetctive matter more personal then real scientific, as everything has its use. But the first comment i though it was from a misinformed person, and then troll appeared...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 21:06 UTC
On Sony shows off upcoming full-frame lenses at Photokina article (337 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: The A7 was a marketing strategy to say we have the smallest FF, no one will do it smaller then ours. But the small and light will not balance well with fast af lenses for a FF sensor. Oh god, theres a gap between a7 and a77 size. if sony don't do it quickly someone will. Please small lenses sony this system is faded to fail in its purpose.

Funny thing is that A7mk2 has a bigger grip and body, weights more and every reviewer on the internet agrees with i said 5 months ago...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 01:41 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2359 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcelobtp: Canon seems to be without cards, 50 mpx sensor but without improved Dynamic Range, this seems a bit silly, 5ds is acceptable, as the main audience who is targeted are studio photographers with controled light. but 5ds R, for landscape? Just for the canonists, even then, most of them already have an A7R, and will be waiting for the A7Rmk2. Anyway a i really like the improved hardware to favor the new high mpx count, what a7r in first place did not acomplished.
I'm really losing faith in canon. As i much prefer the color science from canon then the others, excluding MF. This launch marks the desperation of canon.
Sigma and tamrom are upping their game really quickly, and sony is orquestratiing the sensor development and production, i like to see competition, not exclusivity.

YEP you can count on that, then samsung will take it from sony and starts to do the same with more finesse hahaha!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 00:45 UTC
On Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L article (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

maadfw: This lens just made Nikon 14-24 a Standard zoom :)

I care and at least 5 more people do...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 00:43 UTC
On Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L article (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

maadfw: This lens just made Nikon 14-24 a Standard zoom :)

Nope, this lens is just a F/4.0 not 2.8 like the Nikon one.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 17:04 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (2359 comments in total)

Canon seems to be without cards, 50 mpx sensor but without improved Dynamic Range, this seems a bit silly, 5ds is acceptable, as the main audience who is targeted are studio photographers with controled light. but 5ds R, for landscape? Just for the canonists, even then, most of them already have an A7R, and will be waiting for the A7Rmk2. Anyway a i really like the improved hardware to favor the new high mpx count, what a7r in first place did not acomplished.
I'm really losing faith in canon. As i much prefer the color science from canon then the others, excluding MF. This launch marks the desperation of canon.
Sigma and tamrom are upping their game really quickly, and sony is orquestratiing the sensor development and production, i like to see competition, not exclusivity.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2015 at 16:41 UTC as 375th comment | 3 replies
On Medium well done: Two takes on the Pentax 645Z article (245 comments in total)

Well, i did not like any of the photos shown here. The main problem could be the leaf shutter, yes, but for the price, really dont think so, why would you expect that this camera would be better in any situation then the 30.000 plus dolars cameras systems?
This is a tool primarily for landscapers and still life, then the others, photography in its primitive very thoughtfull process of trying to get the perfect scene with the maximum amount of detail, DR, and less distortion. These critiques are for newcomers to photography, really, who knows about it would not make these kinds of mistakes. And im not even a good photographer.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 9, 2014 at 15:14 UTC as 57th comment
On Enthusiast compact camera roundup (2014) article (185 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I will read the article when you add the other valid competitors for the LX100 to the article. Right now it just looks like an article to promote the LX100. And I am the biggest LX100 Fanboy out there. However, I still want to see a fair fight. Right now this article just looks like an advertisement for the LX100 and not a true comparison.

i'm sorry but you did not even read what he wrote...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 26, 2014 at 17:23 UTC
On Sony debuts 21MP stacked CMOS sensor for smartphones article (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: You can't bend the laws of physics. Sensors can be made any which way, but the small ones will never, ever match the larger ones. Back illuminated, electron-multiplying, it doesn't matter. They are modest enhancements that produce a slightly better product, but a 1/2.3" sensor will never be a m4/3, APS, etc.

Many in the past said we would never fly, and here it is... closing or opening depends on your point of view.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 23, 2014 at 23:36 UTC
In reply to:

Scales USA: Google also has facial recognition, so it can name the persons in a photo, and even inform the FBI if a wanted person is found.

The potential, as noted sounds both wonderful, and also frightening. Snapping a candid photo of a person and having them named? Its possible now for millions of people, but so far, Google is holding back due to potential privacy issues. (big $$$$$$$$$ lawsuits)

Thats what they want bigbrother full time, full population. Any data they want they have it. Control.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 15:00 UTC
On Sony debuts 21MP stacked CMOS sensor for smartphones article (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

RichRMA: You can't bend the laws of physics. Sensors can be made any which way, but the small ones will never, ever match the larger ones. Back illuminated, electron-multiplying, it doesn't matter. They are modest enhancements that produce a slightly better product, but a 1/2.3" sensor will never be a m4/3, APS, etc.

Never?
Thats arrogance, our "truth" is just a particle of what the truth really is, open your mind.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2014 at 14:46 UTC

Only truly liked the last one.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2014 at 22:51 UTC as 17th comment
On Sony G Series XQD format v.2 memory cards introduced article (43 comments in total)

I can see it been used in professional bodys in few years. A99II probably will have it. For 4k or 8k use primarily. I can envision a new generation of sports cameras that will have 30 fps or more. The limitation would be file size basicaly 30 raw files per second is just too much, to make the camera cheaper they could use a smaller buffer and let the card be "the buffer". They make you pay more and you think about the cost of the card afterwards.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 30, 2014 at 17:04 UTC as 5th comment | 3 replies
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: Real-world samples (beta) article (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

shutterbud: So, to test the new semi-pro sports camera which has been anticipated for yers, you go out on a sunny day and take portraits and landscape shots?
Pointless gallery, almost certainly designed to side-step the fact that the sensor is substandard compared to modern alternatives.
Can DPR please get their act together?

WOW, guys, if they are posting photos is so obvious that what matters is the sensor. when they post the entire review we will have an aproach about to the other things that makes a camera better than the other.
The image quality has an obvious importance and can't be downgraded for what it is, you buy an camera fundamentaly to take a good picture with quality.
I just don't think that sample pictures are representative, is like a "Petisco" to antecipate the main dish.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2014 at 14:51 UTC
On G7X-ISO125-IMG_0229 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

What are you talking about?
This is lens lack of resolution at the borders.
Are you expecting what?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 14:15 UTC as 4th comment
Total: 144, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »