The A-Team

Everybody who complains about viewfinders on compacts just wet their pants.

Does Adobe usually price new versions of LR the same or higher than the previous versions? Do they often drop in price in time? What's their history?

The 20 1.7 is exactly what I would be interested in. I didn't know about the in body IS. I thought all mirrorless cameras had that. Guess not. How does the Oly EPL5 compare to the GX1 in terms of...

Hello from the Canon DSLR forums. I don't venture over here very much. I was just looking at prices of micro four thirds cameras, and I was shocked to see that you can get a Panny GX1 body for...

are you kidding? i would take a panny GX1 + 20 1.7, get faster aperture, more lens options, and save $100 to boot!

You get a 28 1.8, 35 1.8, and 50 1.8 all in one lens? BEAST.

Sorry but I'm not sure what you mean by PV. I've googled around for the free packages, and there may be some gems amidst the pile. However I believe you generally get what you pay for. I do make my...

A 50 1.4 equivalent would hit the spot.

Nice looking camera. For the same price I'd probably go for the Canon G1X with swivel screen and more versatile lens.

Minimum shutter speed: 300 seconds. TAKE NOTE, Canon, Nikon.

I have been using Aperture for about 3 years now, and I think it's time for a switch. Speed issues.  For those who have switched, what has been your experience? Are you pleased overall? What...

How long after the beta begins does the official version usually take to come out? I want to make the jump to LR, but probably not if the new version is coming soon.

You'll probably spend more money getting to and from HK than you will save on the 1DX in HK. If you find yourself there incidentally, I would recommend the shops on Stanley Street in Central. I'm...

I am unsatisfied with Aperture and will probably be making the switch to LR soon. I like the images that some people are getting with the abundant presets that seem to be out there.  Which preset...

That would be an ultra compact package! However I would bypass the 40 2.8 and go for a 35 f/2 or 28 1.8. Why? it'll get you closer to a "normal" 50mm FOV as well as being future proof for going...

Lars, I don't think we're going to question your decision to rotate an image right side up.

Sigma has a new 18-200 OS that should give you better image quality than the 18-250s and 18-270s out there. See here: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/product/18-200mm-f35-63-ii-dc-os-hsm It's also more...

confusing! sure takes a long time to click through all the entries. could have been designed better. why have categories if the entries are all in one pool?

The difference between 24 and 35mm is far greater than 70 and 85mm in practical terms. A 70 and an 85mm can both take a good portrait, but try squeezing that 35mm into a tight space with a bunch of...

Canon 17-40? Canon 16-35? Sigma 12-24? Problem solved.