-
Everybody who complains about viewfinders on compacts just wet their pants.
-
Does Adobe usually price new versions of LR the same or higher than the previous versions? Do they often drop in price in time? What's their history?
-
The 20 1.7 is exactly what I would be interested in. I didn't know about the in body IS. I thought all mirrorless cameras had that. Guess not. How does the Oly EPL5 compare to the GX1 in terms of...
-
Hello from the Canon DSLR forums. I don't venture over here very much.
I was just looking at prices of micro four thirds cameras, and I was shocked to see that you can get a Panny GX1 body for...
-
are you kidding? i would take a panny GX1 + 20 1.7, get faster aperture, more lens options, and save $100 to boot!
-
You get a 28 1.8, 35 1.8, and 50 1.8 all in one lens? BEAST.
-
Sorry but I'm not sure what you mean by PV. I've googled around for the free packages, and there may be some gems amidst the pile. However I believe you generally get what you pay for. I do make my...
-
A 50 1.4 equivalent would hit the spot.
-
Nice looking camera. For the same price I'd probably go for the Canon G1X with swivel screen and more versatile lens.
-
Minimum shutter speed: 300 seconds. TAKE NOTE, Canon, Nikon.
-
I have been using Aperture for about 3 years now, and I think it's time for a switch. Speed issues.
For those who have switched, what has been your experience? Are you pleased overall? What...
-
How long after the beta begins does the official version usually take to come out? I want to make the jump to LR, but probably not if the new version is coming soon.
-
You'll probably spend more money getting to and from HK than you will save on the 1DX in HK. If you find yourself there incidentally, I would recommend the shops on Stanley Street in Central. I'm...
-
I am unsatisfied with Aperture and will probably be making the switch to LR soon. I like the images that some people are getting with the abundant presets that seem to be out there.
Which preset...
-
That would be an ultra compact package! However I would bypass the 40 2.8 and go for a 35 f/2 or 28 1.8. Why? it'll get you closer to a "normal" 50mm FOV as well as being future proof for going...
-
Lars, I don't think we're going to question your decision to rotate an image right side up.
-
Sigma has a new 18-200 OS that should give you better image quality than the 18-250s and 18-270s out there. See here: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/product/18-200mm-f35-63-ii-dc-os-hsm
It's also more...
-
confusing! sure takes a long time to click through all the entries. could have been designed better. why have categories if the entries are all in one pool?
-
The difference between 24 and 35mm is far greater than 70 and 85mm in practical terms. A 70 and an 85mm can both take a good portrait, but try squeezing that 35mm into a tight space with a bunch of...
-
Canon 17-40? Canon 16-35? Sigma 12-24? Problem solved.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
266 |
| Threads started |
59 |
| Last post |
3 weeks ago |
The A-Team has not added any dpreview gear yet.
|