Twoeyes

Twoeyes

Lives in Spain Spain
Joined on Dec 31, 2008

Comments

Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
On Journey to the center of the Earth with Robbie Shone article (49 comments in total)

I always thought cave photography was such hard work, being a caver for a few years myself. There is dust, mud, condensation, the technical difficulties of the cave itself & reliance on the other cavers to have as much patience as yourself etc etc BUT when you achieve end results like this, it must just keep you going.
It makes above ground photography seem a piece of cake.
Absolutely superb ... thank you for the article.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 13:17 UTC as 26th comment
On Coming soon: Lens Reviews to return to dpreview.com article (274 comments in total)

Excellent. With the sudden influx of large sensor cameras on the market or being announced, the choosing of the lenses to get the best out of these sensors is going to become more important. So this move by DPR to restart lens reviews is really good news for the consumers.
'If' this is done to the same standard as existing DPR reviews, the site should become an even more valuable resource.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2012 at 13:36 UTC as 28th comment
On Reviewed: Sony NEX-5N 16MP mirrorless camera article (195 comments in total)
In reply to:

Twoeyes: In the review samples at the end of this review, there is one image DSC06651 where there are some moving figures at the left end of the ornamental lake. It almost looks like a double exposure. At 1/1250 sec shutter speed, there really should not be any motion blur showing on a walking person. I am sure there will be an explanation of this phenomenon. Is it an artefact of the electronic first shutter?
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/1443079/dsc06651?inalbum=sony-nex-5n-review-samples

Thank you DPR for adding the comments under the review sample images.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2011 at 07:49 UTC
On DSC06651 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (9 comments in total)
In reply to:

CodySLC: Easily explained.. this is an in-camera HDR

Thank you for adding the comments.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2011 at 07:47 UTC
On Reviewed: Sony NEX-5N 16MP mirrorless camera article (195 comments in total)
In reply to:

Twoeyes: In the review samples at the end of this review, there is one image DSC06651 where there are some moving figures at the left end of the ornamental lake. It almost looks like a double exposure. At 1/1250 sec shutter speed, there really should not be any motion blur showing on a walking person. I am sure there will be an explanation of this phenomenon. Is it an artefact of the electronic first shutter?
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/1443079/dsc06651?inalbum=sony-nex-5n-review-samples

This would explain it. There should be a comment to say that the 'Auto HDR' feature had been turned on... this would benefit all. For that matter are there any other shots in the samples that have particular settings applied?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2011 at 19:36 UTC
On DSC06651 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (9 comments in total)
In reply to:

CodySLC: Easily explained.. this is an in-camera HDR

This would explain it. There should be a comment to say that the HDR feature had been turned on... this would benefit all. Are there any other shots in the samples that have particular settings applied?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2011 at 19:34 UTC
On DSC06651 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (9 comments in total)

Is it an artefact of the electronic first shutter, causing a double exposure effect?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2011 at 07:35 UTC as 3rd comment
On Reviewed: Sony NEX-5N 16MP mirrorless camera article (195 comments in total)

In the review samples at the end of this review, there is one image DSC06651 where there are some moving figures at the left end of the ornamental lake. It almost looks like a double exposure. At 1/1250 sec shutter speed, there really should not be any motion blur showing on a walking person. I am sure there will be an explanation of this phenomenon. Is it an artefact of the electronic first shutter?
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/1443079/dsc06651?inalbum=sony-nex-5n-review-samples

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2011 at 07:34 UTC as 11th comment | 3 replies
On DSC06651 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (9 comments in total)

It almost looks like a double exposure ... what is going on? At 1/1250 sec shutter speed, there really should not be any motion blur showing on a walking person. I am sure there will be an explanation of this phenomenon.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2011 at 19:29 UTC as 4th comment
On Rushing River in the Modern Landscapes challenge (2 comments in total)

This is a great shot without doubt in my opinion ... so this is no slight to the photographer Mark Kay. But it does not comply with the rules of the challenge. Much of the content is not sharp, it is not generally high contrast and it lacks depth of field at far distance. It is easy to understand that this gained high scores, but to be fair to the other entrants and the creditability of the challenge host, this entry should have been removed. Is that not the host's responsibility?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2011 at 06:30 UTC as 1st comment
On Now... lets have a look! in the Your OLDEST digital image challenge (2 comments in total)

Thank you challenge admin for your support. When I read this challenge I honestly went to find my earliest digital image, and that is what I entered....all part of the fun. And when I scored some of the other entrants I took the same approach.

BUT, now that the results have been released it seems that my understanding of this challenge has not been supported. What has been entered and voted for are pics of aestetic interest rather than what was asked for. They are a selection of 'good old shots', rather than 'Your OLDEST digital image'.
Do not worry- I am not that bitter, even though this has been my worse score by far, just that I am a little suprised how the challenge description has been ignored. What does the challenge admin say on this?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2010 at 10:49 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11