Please exert less effort on engineering 3rd party incompatibilities, and more effort on creating a high-end DX D300 replacement.
fPrime: OMG... Did Dpreview actually admit here that the D600 has a sensor oil/dust issue? And all it took was a incremental model number change by Nikon! Imagine if Nikon had released a D810 as well... Dpreview might have also had the guts to finally acknowledge the Left AF focusing defect instead of hiding their heads in the sand for a year.
sandy b said, "Patco, section 12 and 23."
Sorry, Sandy, there are no occurrences of "oil" in section 12 or 23."Dust" and "residue" are mentioned, but not "oil".
sandy b said, "DPR clearly points out the oil issue in several places in the review, including the conclusion"Revenant said, "DPR mentioned the oil issue in the D600 review"Can either of you point out where "oil" is mentioned in the D600 review? Not doubting you, but I can't seem to find it.
Optimal Prime: Er... Isn't there a more recent Q10 announced almost a year ago...? Why is DPR only receiving the Q7 at this late stage? Strange...
Er... noQ - June 2011Q10 - Sept. 2012Q7 - June 2013
JakeB: f3.5 to f5.6.
These lenses are designed for people taking pics on vacation in bright sunlight and very limiting in most other photographic situations.
If constant f2.8 is overkill in terms of weight and price, at least go for constant f4.
RB59020 wrote: "The Sigma is full frame so it only covers a 27-52mm FOV"No, the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 is a "DC" lens, and as such, is "Designed specifically for APS-C sized sensors", such as DX.Whether a lens is FX or DX, the same crop factor applies on DX sensors.http://www.sigmaphoto.com/product/18-35mm-f18-dc-hsm-art
mas54: Good scopes are a great aid in not crippling animals.
Not shooting them for "sport" would be an even greater aid.
Chuck Lantz: What's next? Protests against Nikon by anti-porn groups, if their products are used for those "assignments"?
If they market a camera specifically intended for porn, as they do with certain scopes specifically intended to help kill animals, perhaps.
Keithns: anybody wonder why it just says VR and not VR2
Khuon is correct. I don't believe Nikon ever includes the VR version in the official lens name, or on the markings on the lens.As an example, the name of newer version of the 18-200mm ends in "...VR II", indicating the 2nd version of the lens, but both the 1st & current versions have VR2.
"The JackPod is only .2 grams" That's amazing! That's about 1/5 the weight of a dollar bill!Kickstarter.com says it's .2 ounces.
Marty4650: I never did get the point of superzoom lenses. If your object is to "never have to change lenses" then why not just buy a Panazonic FZ200 and call it a day?
The whole point behind buying a more expensive ILC is "changing lenses."
Even though zoom lenses have gotten better, good prime lenses really deliver the best image quality. And even among zoom lenses, a 3X zoom generally will perform a lot better than a 15X zoom will. This is simply because ANY zoom lens is a compromise, and the wider the range, the bigger the compromises involved.
Personally, I feel you are paying too large a premium for having the convenience of not changing lenses. A Nikon 2 lens kit would cover the same range at 1/4th the cost... and probably deliver better image quality.
But that's just my opinion. Others will certainly disagree.
> "If your object is to "never have to change lenses""That's not my object, but I do use my 18-200 VR for those times when convenience is higher up on my list than any specific advantages I would have with some of my other lenses.
> "The whole point behind buying a more expensive ILC is "changing lenses.""While being one of the points of these cameras, changing lenses is not the "WHOLE point". Because one *can* change lenses, doesn't mean one *must* change lenses.
Jim Evidon: DNG has all of the advantages of all other formats and none of the disadvantages, since it is an open format. For those who are committed to their camera proprietary formats nothing more can be said. Serious photographers use post processing in LR, CS, DXO, etc. and find it damned annoying that every time they buy a new camera, they have to wait until these excellent processing engines incorporate yet a new format among another 1000 or so other proprietary formats. Surely camera manufacturers, Leica and Pentax excepting, should realize by now that serious photographers do not use their clunky proprietary processors that they supply with their cameras. But I suppose it is like p-----g in the wind to say this. As the saying goes, you can't teach a pig to sing. it's a waste of time and it annoys the pig.
nixda wrote: "There is a reason Aperture doesn't support DNG"
Apple lists DNG on their Aperture system requirements page:http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/
littleroot: Love how I just installed LR from Adobe Cloud this morning and upon launching the product I am told there is a 750MB update available. So much for the claimed benefit of Cloud Subscription slipstreaming the updates. Same thing happened with Photoshop CS6, the latest ACR, etc, 200MB, updates were needed
Your post is also interesting, but if you read littleroot's message again, you might find that he was also talking about LR: "I just installed LR from Adobe Cloud this morning and upon launching the product I am told there is a 750MB update available".
Jim: Yet still no Canon G1X support...bummer.
The Canon G1 X was listed as a newly supported camera in the previous 7.1 version of ACR:http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5391and listed here as supported by ACR and Lightroom:http://www.adobe.com/ca/products/photoshop/extend.html#supportedcameras
BabylonPhotos: They don't say anything about the Fujifilm X-Pro1, but I see the latest Fuji X-E1 in the list of supported cameras? Does anyone know something?
"They don't say anything about the Fujifilm X-Pro1""Isn't it weird that ACR supports the Fuji X-Pro1 but not Lightroom?"The X-Pro1 is listed as supported by ACR & Lightroom:http://www.adobe.com/ca/products/photoshop/extend.html#supportedcameras
"Nikon has had a busy year, launching several new products including two full-frame DSLRs, the 36MP D800 and the enthusiast D600"Wasn't the D4 announced in early January this year?
plasnu: Really good camera if it were 3 years ago, but I'm wondering who will buy this today. Too many way better alternative such as D3200, NEX...
In what ways do you feel the D3200 is "way better"?Is it because it has more MP?
CanadianCoolpix: I guess it doesn't apply to Canada.
Anyhow, I have taken lots of videos longer than 30 minutes. How about filming a talk or presentation that lasts longer than 30 min? Or how about filming an event that 'might' happen, like a bird coming to nest, etc.?
You can find the few minutes or seconds that you want, and discard the rest. But it would be a nuisance if you couldn't even film it from a tripod, without being there to restart the camera.
"I guess it doesn't apply to Canada."I don't know about other makers, but from DMC-G3 review, it appears at least Panasonic applies this limitation only in Europe:"Running time - Up to 2GB for Motion JPEG, up to capacity of card for AVCHD (Limited to 29 minutes on models sold in Europe)."
Mssimo: It would be perfect if it had a HDMI in. I would just buy it as a monitor/EVF.
"Add usb tethering and you could have some incredible camera control as well on the same amazing screen."You mean something like this?:http://www.ononesoftware.com/products/dslr-camera-remote/
JDGagne: nice scam. there was no way to download this unless it was the middle of the night. Sometimes do nothing is better than screwing up; even though the intention was right. This guy is banned from my book.
Yes, he should have respected *your* time zone instead of his own.How inconsiderate!
ChrisKramer1: Reading about this I looked on the Adobe website and saw the special 30% reduction on the upgrade. I did think about it but 230 Euros is a lot of mulah (which could go towards a tamron 60mm f.2) and my CS4 seems more than enough. But then I thought about Gimp - sometimes you mention Photoshop to people and they reply "Nah, I use Gimp". So I'm trying it out - and I'm hooked! Seems powerful enough and there are los of tutorials and plug-ins available for free! I can use my Nikon raws too. So thanks Adobe - now I know I don't need you anymore!
Danny said, "Yep, let GIMP add CMYK and we are talking".Ive not tried it but:"CMYK support in The GIMP"https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CMYK_support_in_The_GIMP