Boerseuntjie

Boerseuntjie

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Feb 13, 2012

Comments

Total: 427, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: Look a D610 with retarded shell and no Video....LOL is it just me or does it look like a Sony A900
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/09/sony-a900-is-of.html

Why would I be jealous I already own a camera that does not shoot video the Sony A900...LOL and wait for it,.... It has the same sensor as this camera...LOL

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 21:06 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)

Look a D610 with retarded shell and no Video....LOL is it just me or does it look like a Sony A900
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/09/sony-a900-is-of.html

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 20:53 UTC as 342nd comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Elikan: Before reading the article I looked at the pictures and in my taste the samsung pictures were the most pleasing . What I liked most in the Samsung was its natural colors. Usually I discard pictures where the colors are not right. I guess that most smartphone users also value correct colors. Smartphone pictures are rarely enlarged to a size where the weaknesses of the Samsung camera described in the article matter.
A possible explanation for Samsung's caring for the colors, is that of all the g four compared makes, Samsung is the only one that manufactures cameras

Do you realize how stupid you sound? Samsung fanboy

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 16:25 UTC
On DSC00020 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

Najinsky: Shutter speed too low, or shutter shock?

F8

Direct link | Posted on Oct 31, 2013 at 18:13 UTC

I like what I see, I was hoping to dust off my Minolta MD and Voigtländer M lenses and use them on this camera, lets hope they work.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 22:31 UTC as 78th comment
In reply to:

chlamchowder: Looks ok, although it seems like some detail is lost to noise reduction even in the base ISO shots. Moving up the ISO scale, it still seems like the JPG engine should be doing a better job (because modern full frame sensors are so good that anything below ISO 800 is basically considered low).

It would be more interesting to look at processed raw files without noise reduction applied.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/camera-reviews/sony/a7r/sony-a7rGALLERY.HTM
These are raw files and you can use Sony software for the raw conversion, just switch off all the in camera stuff and have a look
http://esupport.sony.com/p/swu-download.pl?upd_id=2697&SMB=YES
http://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/www/disoft/int/ids/operation/index.html

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 22:18 UTC
On Sample gallery: Sony's 20.7-megapixel Xperia Z1 post (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Scurvy Dog of PR: Didn't I read that Sony was getting out of the Cell Phone biz?

So Panasonic makes Cell phones that is news to me

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 17:59 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2063 comments in total)
In reply to:

lazy lightning: Still just the same flat, lifeless images as all m4/3 cameras. No separation (not talking bokeh), everything in the image appears to be on the same plane giving the impression of a one dimensional universe. Lovely colors though!

+1 I must be a troll

Direct link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 22:36 UTC
On Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? article (187 comments in total)

Fake but don't count it out there will be one soon

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 18:55 UTC as 140th comment
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: There is just two things that is keeping me from getting these camera's and it's big deal for me, no silent shutter mode and IBIS, I will praise Sony for their engineering and these cameras look amazing but I will stick with NEX-6 for now.
If these cameras had IBIS they would have been killer.

Hey idiots I did not say the NEX-6 has IBIS or silent shutter and for that reason I do not see the benefit of getting these new cameras and selling my NEX-6.
The full frame is what I was looking for but IBIS would have made it a game changer in my mind

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 18:20 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)

There is just two things that is keeping me from getting these camera's and it's big deal for me, no silent shutter mode and IBIS, I will praise Sony for their engineering and these cameras look amazing but I will stick with NEX-6 for now.
If these cameras had IBIS they would have been killer.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 16:36 UTC as 536th comment | 6 replies
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)
In reply to:

Abaregi: Well done Sony.
For such a short time in the camera business they keep pushing out innovative stuff. Hopefully this might push Canon and Nikon to do something exiting.

Sony has been in the camera business for over 33 years now not a short time at all

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 15:27 UTC
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)

What was wrong with the D600 it was a well oiled machine ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 14:10 UTC as 94th comment | 5 replies
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)

"Braking news" New shutter because the old one was spewing oil ;(

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 15:27 UTC as 171st comment
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review preview (510 comments in total)
In reply to:

Alex Permit: For me, a "satisfying photographic experience" is taking photos and then being satisfied with the results when i look and/or print them at home.

The images i get from my rx100 ii are satisfying, while those from my previous powershots/Lumix/ et al are not. I know of no other POCKETABLE camera that gives pictures which satisfy but for the rx 100.

DPR's objective tests back up my subjective views.

The "user experience" of the rx 100 does not match my x100s, or even my nex 6. Those cameras, however, don't fit in my pants pocket. Neither does my D3s. So what. Each camera size class fits a purpose.

The rx100 is, imho, a clear gold star.

WW2 Design... LOL, well WW2 gave us the "A" bomb and the RX100 is the" Bomb" Who cares if it's silver?, I think it should be Uranium with a Atomic clow
@Boky you must be wearing hot pants ;)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2013 at 21:49 UTC
On Curved smartphone screen from Samsung coming soon post (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: This is not new and Samsung is not the first .....yawn

I'm talking about curved OLED tech not smartphones

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2013 at 20:40 UTC
On Curved smartphone screen from Samsung coming soon post (27 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boerseuntjie: This is not new and Samsung is not the first .....yawn

Troll This.
http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/lg-5-inch-oled-display-hands-on/

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2013 at 17:28 UTC
On Curved smartphone screen from Samsung coming soon post (27 comments in total)

This is not new and Samsung is not the first .....yawn

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2013 at 22:35 UTC as 11th comment | 4 replies
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review preview (510 comments in total)
In reply to:

ulfie: Simple: Too expensive.

Ricoh who?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 21:11 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review preview (510 comments in total)
In reply to:

bert01: I think dpreview is being a troll on it's own review just to create controversy. Giving the RX100 the Silver award for being the best in its class makes a mockery of their rating system.

DP Review had a bit too much of the Canon and Nikon Cool-Aid and when it comes to phones iPhone and Samsung Cool-Aid.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2013 at 20:32 UTC
Total: 427, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »