JackM: could have had Rembrandt lighting here.
I can agree with that assessment.
I think Rembrandt would have conflicted with the casual mood of the shot (opinion based on the squatting pose). Personally, I would have either used fill flash or a mid-sized reflector.
Scottelly: Wow. Canon finally catches up to the Sony A77 . . . almost. Oh wait . . . this thing doesn't have a fold-out screen, does it?
No, but thankfully, the 7D2 doesn't come in A-mount, either.
BaldCol: Dual cards slots I get. Dual format I don't. Can someone explain the benefit of having two different card formats on one camera. Thanks.
Either for an Eye-Fi Card or a regular UHS SD. The point being that RAW-to-CF-plus-JPG-to-SD would be significantly more compatible with a wide range of electronic devices capable of transmitting images to sports editors around the world in as close to real time as possible.
joyclick: @ about $1800 does 7D II make sense no matter what specs?Is the pricing reasonable from the buyer's point?
None of the FFs within the 7D2's price have a 65 all-cross-type AF system with F/8 AF on the dual-cross center point.
If you don't understand why this AF configuration is so important, then it's likely that you do not take the photos that the 7D2 is designed for, so any of the FFs are better suited for your needs.
photolando: I rarely hear anyone boast about GPS. Who cares? But they put GPS in the 7DII and no Wi-Fi?? IN TODAY'S world!?? I need wi-fi A LOT more than I will EVER need GPS. I don't ever need GPS. I switched from Nikon to Canon years ago because of cmos v ccd. I may go back now. FF 24 MB, tilting monitor, and wi-fi for $500 more with the new 750? Convince me to stay with Canon.
If the D750 will do everything you need, then the 7D II was never meant for you.
NZ Scott: .... Bloody hell. The ColourChecker Passport is USD $115. Seems like a lot for some coloured plastic squares.
It's 84 USD from Amazon right now. Bought one a week ago, myself. It just arrived, however, so I've yet to start doing the calibrations.
JEROME NOLAS: These interviews are pointless, waste of time. Talking about things they want not the things we would like to talk about. Basically PR and marketing talk. All media should boycott them but then they wouln't have a nice trip to Japan...
You must not have experience in large-scale business. If you did, you'd know that "PR and marketing talk" is the only kind of talk they CAN say, because everything else is confidential.
Photographer Jonathan: A really nice camera, BUT, every new camera should have a touch screen, and it should be articulating so you can angle it for portraits not just landscape, and for actual photo shoots, it is a must to have a focus point that can be moved in one step, nice and fast, not two steps, and 8000 shutter would of been nice also, and a higher flash sync speed, and a popup flash, I could keep going if a wanted to, but this camera is really nice, now if Canon would make one the same, with there regular lens mount that takes my ff glass, that would be great, but I might have to buy this new fuji along with the 56 f1.2 lens, and the 35 f1.4,,,,,, I am sick of waiting for Canon, and Nikon slightly missed the boat with the DF, it should've been more like this fuji Xt1, ( real digital fusion ) with electronic view finder, focus peaking, video, touch flip screen, 4 years in the making so they could leave out all the new technology, doesn't make sense, go Fuji, kick Nikon and Canon's ass
"What happens with a touch screen camera when you press the camera tightly against you cheek?"
The touchscreen deactivates because a proximity sensor - a sensor that detects when something (such as a face) is within millimeters of the viewfinder - turns the LCD off. Last time I checked, Canon had three "real cameras" that work exactly this way (650D, 700D, 70D).
groucher: This is a classic compromise - a fully featured camera (except for video) in a retro body. A shrink wrapped but cluttered D4. I'm hoping that this is the first in a series of Dfs and that eventually we'll have a Dfm with no rear screen, no PAS and no wired or wireless connectivity - a true uncluttered digital FM (or FE).
Underneath all the controls, thumbwheels and displays the Fd looks pretty good.
@groucherYour Dfm wish specs sound like it would cost even more than this Df already does.
kevin_r: This is a lens Sony users have been shouting for for a long time but now Sigma has gone greedy and removed the OS. Which means that a whole market segment that wants to use this lens on the FE or Nex E mounts with LA adapters will have no stabilisation.
Perhaps they should simply bolt on an FE mount with stabilisation and watch it take off. It'll give the 24-70mm f/4 Zeiss a fair thrashing since that lens is priced at $1000.00.
"Sigma has gone greedy and removed the OS"
Sony decided to make a full-frame E-mount camera without IBIS, and you're blaming Sigma?
Donnie G: The top of the line Olys and Panas have much more to fear from these new Sonys, (especially the A7), than any current mid level DSLR. It'll be interesting to see what happens to 4/3s system cameras if the new Sonys prove to be popular. Will the A7 kill off Olympus in 2014? Will Sony's camera division turn a profit in 2014? Will the Chicago Cubs win the World Series in 2014? (Ok, maybe that last remark was a bit much), but you get the idea. Speculation is futile. We need answers that only time can tell us. :)
Yes, Sony appears to have a medical imaging portfolio (I found their online medical imaging catalog via Google), but the product lineup does not seem to be anywhere near that of Olympus'. I am aware of Sony's financial issues, but that's precisely why it makes a lot of sense to compete against, then buyout, Olympus.
With an acquisition, Sony would jump to the top of the medical imaging industry by proxy (i.e. "Olympus, a Sony company") and completely own all of Olympus' imaging-related patents (as opposed to their current, limited patent-sharing agreement). Gaining a significant foothold of the m4/3 market would be a side-benefit.
As they've already done this kind of thing twice before (with Konica Minolta and Ericsson), it's not out of the realm of possibility that they'll aim to buy Olympus primarily for their med-tech.
Though, such a strategy would hinge not on the success of the A7 and A7R, but on the success of the PS4 (which releases next month).
@pdeluxReally? You don't believe it's in Sony's best interest to compete against Olympus in order to drive down the price of a future Olympus acquisition?
Seehund: Is there a technical reason for the inability to use movie mode and WiFi simultaneously? If not, can we expect a firmware update that addresses this issue?
Yes, there is: Wi-Fi is slow.
It's barely fast enough to transmit a full-size JPG in seconds, but nowhere near fast enough for RAW. The lag of Live View for stills is already noticeable, rendering wireless video streaming completely unusable.
ProfHankD: I really don't much care about PDAF. In fact, I usually prefer manual focus with peaking. However, I'm impressed to see that Canon's dual pixel structure doesn't seem to have sacrificed IQ for PDAF. According to both DxOMark and the DPReview sample images, this sensor is a significant improvement over the sensor in, for example, the 100D or 700D. It still has a half stop less dynamic range, but it's the first 1.6X crop sensor Canon has made that doesn't get trashed by the 1.5X crop one in the Sony NEX-5.
DPReview says the 70D competes with Canon's FF -- I cannot agree. The Sony NEX-7 outperforms the 6D at low ISO and looses to it at high ISO, but 6D IQ is always better than the 70D in color depth, dynamic range, and low light. Still, the 70D proves that Canon's dual pixels are a viable approach, competitive in APS-C IQ while incorporating a useful new capability. Now if only Canon would give us direct access to the 40M half-pixels.... ;-)
@ProfHankDCould a 20MP stereo pair be used to create a single 20MP 3D photo?
red fuji: In engineering, we call the D610 a 'reworked' D600. The word 'improvement' should be reserved for new models replacing older models. The D610 exists because of the D600 flaw. I dont know how Nikon could get away with this marketing move. Nikon really should have recalled all the troubled D600.
@photoreddiExcept Zigmont mentioned the -P- 7000 - the CoolPix, not the DSLR.
falconeyes: 0.01 lux is -8 EV.
I heavily doubt it was this dark, as it would correspond be about a moonless starry night. But the fireflies then would illuminate the scenery (or their direct surrounding at least) as main light source and I didn't notice the effect in the video.
Anyway, while dark, -8 EV corresponds to (F/1.4, 1/24s) ISO 1,200,000. I saw extreme noise at 640px web resolution. Scaling web resolution to full 24 MP resolution, the would be the screen pixel noise (24MP) at ISO 14,000. I'd say a normal full frame 24MP dSLR doesn't have this much pixel noise at ISO 14,000.
Therefore, I conclude that the demo shown by Canon is technically lame, more of a marketing gig than anything else.
@falconeyesPerhaps you were distracted by the marketing text in the center of the frame, but the scenes at 0:09-0:15 was of the night sky, precisely to show that this video was taken during a "moonless, starry night."
SeeRoy: Why doesn't one of the manufacturers release something with overall improvements in IQ (bigger sensor, faster lens etc) keeping the size down by eliminating the LCD screen?
Apart from setup (and the chumps who chimp all the time) I think many people would trade it for overall performance gains if the essential functions were externally accessible and setup could be done via an EVF. After all, there are plenty of overpriced cameras out there lacking a viewfinder - which many of us find indispensable.
Still, adding an EVF to cameras in this sector: about bl00dy time too.
@SeeRoyWhat is the point of a digital compact that can't be used to show the photo it just took?