The Fuji X-Pro 2 is the first camera I pre-ordered and purchased new (after working my way through six or seven brands with purchase of used cameras, including Fuji X, over about as many years). And thanks to dPreview for pointing out the significance of the changes for selecting the focus point (good coverage of frame and the joystick for moving the focus point) that displaces focus-and-recompose.
To help APS-C, can some of their lenses have graceful falloff from in-focus to out-of-focus that rivals larger formats? Although image quality in technical terms might not require full frame, the transition effect just mentioned is attractive to many of us enthusiast photographers.
papa natas: I liked it.Not enough to go and buy the camera, but guys...Thanks for not using "cool" and "sexy" about the camera's features.Mystery question:How do they get a British accent guy in...Seattle?
"How do they get a British accent guy in...Seattle?" I believe the the website was started and developed into maturity in Britain, then Amazon bought it and moved it to Seattle.
arhmatic: People should stop calling this "retro".
It has great look and it's appealing to me, but otherwise it's a square looking camera, both digital and analog controls, large screen and such... Only two elements might be considered "retro" --- dial for exposure, and maybe the optical view finder - but OVF (with pentaprism) is really everywhere in the DSLR world. So no, it's just a modern camera. Better styled one, but not "retro". It's a buy for me.
"retrogressive" or "retrospective"? :)
alextardif: That last paragraph in the Overall Impressions, LOL! Drinking your own cool aid a bit, no? I've no doubt it's a fine tool when paired with the primes you've mentioned, yet it leaves me wanting for more, in the "XT1 Mk2 more" sort of way, which no doubt will follow. Looking forward to trying it out nonetheless...
Did you find yourself shooting a little further back to be sure to include what you wanted?
djrocks66: I'm just wondering... I have never used a Leica before. Are these lenses really the sharpest and do they have the best color/contrast? I am pleased with my Fuji system and find the prime lenses very sharp with great color and contrast. Is it part hype or are they the real deal? Just wondering.
The older - as far back as the Summaron 35/3.5 - and "budget" - Summarit 35/2.5 - Leica lenses I've tried work fine on Fuji X cameras with generic adapters. There is the APS-C 1.5x crop factor. ... And there are fine M-mount legacy lenses from other manufacturers, too.
Tried it on a couple of photos. Size reduction was 2 or 6 times - seems to depend on how much detail the original has. Fast Stone reported the JPG quality levels. The less detailed photo went from 100 to 88, the more detailed from 97 to 90. Then I opened the originals in Picture Window Pro and saved them at the corresponding JPG quality number. The PWP file sizes came out approximately 10 percent less than JPGmini (but PWP lost my comments added to the Exif).
Both reductions were remarkably similar to the original, certainly acceptable for Web use. The JPGmini was slightly sharper than the PWP reduction and the original. No halos, but you might or might not like it. I wonder whether the image is deliberately sharpened a bit, or that simply happens within their algorithm.
Incidentally, the more detailed photo was taken with a Sigma DP2 Merrill camera with a Foveon sensor.
Spend less for a better lens of the same type: a Minolta Rokkor 40/2, which is a copy of Leica's Summicron 40. In M-mount, and of course a focus ring. Wonderful images.
rgibbons: Is the flat lens efficient at passing light? My camera lens with coatings can pass over 95% of the light. Do the flat lens antennae block some light, and are less efficient?.
Note that the research was funded in part by grants from the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Commercialization and the bulk of the profits after a small royalty to Harvard University will be taken by Google and other corporations. Same story as with many of Apple's "innovations."
Ingemar Edfalk: "I will have the camera set to the AdobeRGB color space and not sRGB, which is better suited to JPEG shooting. AdobeRGB gives a wider color gamut..." As far as I know this is not correct. The RAW file is not an RGB file. The choose of colorspace comes later in the conversion to RGB. The posibility to choose in camera targets JPEG shooting.
The author wrote, "AdobeRGB gives a wider color gamut, and is the best option for raw images that will subsequently be edited on a computer."
Just underlining how badly the author misunderstands raw files.
Third-party MF primes are so much more effective and fun on a Fuji XE-1. New firmware allows min shutter speed to trigger ISO increase. Mag rocker button is immediate, 3X and 10X. It's an APS-C camera, but a Voigtlander 21/4 works fine on it.The reviewer gives details that make his case about the Sony. Sony is a new-tech gizmo company, not a camera company.
50 mm sample http://www.flickr.com/photos/41790885@N08/9326778495/
Charles2: In Etchells' second paragraph we learn the factory is only 90 minutes by car from Fukushima, ground zero of a nuclear disaster slipping toward an even more disastrous sequel. Ah, the radiation!
Nothing negative about Sigma intended. If only the nuclear industry had the same attention to detail, Japan and the world might have been spared the ongoing disaster emanating from Fukushima.
In Etchells' second paragraph we learn the factory is only 90 minutes by car from Fukushima, ground zero of a nuclear disaster slipping toward an even more disastrous sequel. Ah, the radiation!
In the film days, did newspaper darkroom staff routinely dodge and burn?
In the digital era, if you forbid any change to a camera JPG, you choose a style set by the manufacturer - Olympus colors, Nikon exposure, or whatever.
YetiYeti: Raw Therapee seems also an obvious candidate for this comparison. In latest V4.0 edition, it is stable, fast, free, and becoming more and more Lightroom like in workflow and experience (but has no "catalog" concept, like Lightroom) . In some cases I get better results with RT, than with Lightroom. It even supports Adobe lens profiles. Available for Win, Mac, Linux.. 32 or 64 bit... Lively community participating on their forum too.
If you find it hard to believe, go and try. I have no affiliation with them, I just admire their work...
Raw Therapee exposure adjustments can be very precise, .01 stop if you wish. All its exposure and brightness tools together bring just about any image (raw file or TIF) into appropriate dynamic range.The LAB curves are another fine RT tool.
"in a Foveon sensor, every pixel captures a true color because the red, green and blue filters are stacked above the light-gathering photodiodes."My understanding is that there are no such filters in a Foveon sensor. Light travels deeper into the silicon depending on its wavelength (color); the readouts gather the intensities at several depths.
The K-5 has been wonderful and will remain so for me. Evolutionary changes will serve new buyers well.
"The good news for those staring out" is that most likely no one will stare back in at you.