Turbguy1

Turbguy1

Lives in United States Laramie, WY, United States
Works as a Retired
Joined on Jul 3, 2009

Comments

Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On BPG image format aims to replace JPEGs article (206 comments in total)

I smell Beta vs. VHS here....

Direct link | Posted on Dec 16, 2014 at 02:54 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply

Ahh...why not just put a diffuser over the existing camera lens and point that in the direction of the shot...using a special app to read light values off the cam's sensor??

Direct link | Posted on Nov 29, 2014 at 01:31 UTC as 19th comment | 4 replies

Depending on the Interaxial separations of the stereo lens pairs, close scene elements may be very acceptable. It appears to me to be less than 1" separation, which would allow good stereo as close a 2-3' without excessive deviation...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2014 at 03:32 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

Nuno Souto: This same nonsense was tried here in Australia. It's nothing more than pure consolidated revenue raising.
There is no way that "license" money will ever be used specifically to improve o help anything with the parks. It's pure bureaucracy.

In that case, the NFS's FY2015 budget looks like it'[s well north of $5 BILLION.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 19:23 UTC
In reply to:

John Crawley: Oh, we'll let you drill your oil wells there, just don;t take any pictures. What a bunch of BSers.

You wanna drill a oil/gas well on Federal Land? Be ready to go through a REAL permitting process, and pay a REAL fee/lease!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:47 UTC
In reply to:

Edymagno: Tell them to stop the launch of ten Tomahawks and be done for the next 5 years.

I think the FY2014 NPS budget is about $2.5 Billion...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:34 UTC
In reply to:

forpetessake: Outrageous intrusion of government. Ansel Adams must be turning in his grave. First they annexed the land for the 'public' use, and then that government bureaucracy made themselves judges and de facto owners prohibiting that same public from the free use of the land.

And Ansel had a beautifull Wilderness area named for him. His photography was one push toward establishing these wonderful areas, and he would most likely be saddened that Congress didn't go far enough.

Please pass the Soylent Green...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:26 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: Interesting reading comments about Wilderness areas from non native responders. Wilderness areas are set aside areas to be entered on foot or horseback only. They are not Parks, just set aside areas that you can hunt fish or run naked. Commercial enterprises are allowed (hunting guides for instance) but no permanent man made structures are allowed unless they were grandfathered in (trapper's cabin for instance). Some Wilderness areas are bigger than some EU countries and some are only a few thousand acres. The USFS wants to control visitors and how they use the wilderness but are running into 1st Amendment problems whether free speech or freedom of the press.

The Feds don;t seem to have much problem with the Constitution keeping unauthorized personell out of "Area 51".

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:18 UTC

I wonder how much the "Naming Rights" for Yellowstone would raise....

Hmm... three years for the "Coca Cola Yellowstone National Park", then they could switch to Nike...then...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:16 UTC as 82nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

forpetessake: Outrageous intrusion of government. Ansel Adams must be turning in his grave. First they annexed the land for the 'public' use, and then that government bureaucracy made themselves judges and de facto owners prohibiting that same public from the free use of the land.

Who gave the Pope the deed to South America?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 01:03 UTC
In reply to:

Turbguy1: The foundation of a Wilderness Area is based on the concept of:

“An area where the earth and community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain".

Commercial activity of ANY type, can be trammeling! It is just a matter of degree on a case-by-case basis. That explains the reason for a permit.

They can:

Ask appropriate questions about the activity (what are you going to do, and for how long?).

Issue a permit that places reasoned restrictions on the activity. (No more than 4 persons in a party, no overnight camping within 500 feet of a waterway or lake).

Deny a permit if it is found to be reasonable to do so.

What don't you get??

YOUR Congress created these areas, and have imposed the restrictions on use into law. And they have imposed the responsibility of enforcement onto the Forest Service.

You got a problem with that...complain to Congress.

There are roads in the National Forests that are closed to vehicular traffic. You want to hold a non-profit horse event that atrracts nationwide attention and attendance, you gotta have a permit.

You want to fly a cam over Old Faithful (THAT would be neat)...expect to loose your equipment to the NPS, UNLESS you ask, first...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 00:04 UTC

The foundation of a Wilderness Area is based on the concept of:

“An area where the earth and community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain".

Commercial activity of ANY type, can be trammeling! It is just a matter of degree on a case-by-case basis. That explains the reason for a permit.

They can:

Ask appropriate questions about the activity (what are you going to do, and for how long?).

Issue a permit that places reasoned restrictions on the activity. (No more than 4 persons in a party, no overnight camping within 500 feet of a waterway or lake).

Deny a permit if it is found to be reasonable to do so.

What don't you get??

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2014 at 23:40 UTC as 96th comment | 4 replies

Hahahahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 04:30 UTC as 416th comment
On Kodak Pixpro S-1 First Impressions Review preview (183 comments in total)
In reply to:

LarryLatchkey: The first sentence represents quite an America-centric perspective ;)

"Arguably"

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 23:40 UTC
In reply to:

Ignat Solovey: These images should have been seriously edited in terms of constrast and saturation, not to mention downscaling with sharpening applied. Age-old uncoated Tessar just hasn't enough contrast and linear resolution to produce such images on modern small sensor... although the lens here works with very central part of it, and given the sample is good, that seems more or less possible, when it comes to sharpness (precise focusing is not the issue here, I guess). ILC is yet the only way to squeeze absolutely anything from any kind of lens. I think that some time I'll do something like this with EOS 5D Mk3 and Speed Graphic :) Although I was not even slightly impressed when I tried to do something similar. Recent (5-6 years) achievements in lens building render contraptions like this perfectly impractical, except very special occasions when you need non-telephoto lens with telephoto FOV, but I can hardly imagine such case.

You could have fooled me if you said they were obtained with a D800 and a micro-nikkor.,.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2014 at 23:33 UTC
In reply to:

Tidewater: Go to Google earth then to streetview. There are miles of empty parking lots in the northeast side of the river. The downtown and suburbs look fine. These shots do not convey much of anything but I suppose the book does.
Kodak had nearly 100 years with one basic product. They were the largest manufacturing company in the fortune 500 that did not make cars or oil.

At one time, they were also the largest chemical company, as well.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 21, 2014 at 17:29 UTC

...and to think they INVENTED digital photography. A Vision, missed by top management.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 21, 2014 at 17:28 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
On Rare photos of Nagasaki destruction auctioned article (109 comments in total)

War is hell...even worse since we now have weapons so devastating that you cannot stand back far enough from them to avoid effects on the user!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2014 at 05:07 UTC as 10th comment
On Olympus patent describes Google-Glass-like device post (15 comments in total)

I have been waiting for a wearable viewfinder for a decade! Why not bluetooth it to a "real" cam??

Direct link | Posted on Jun 6, 2014 at 03:52 UTC as 4th comment | 2 replies

Makes my head spin...

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 23:30 UTC as 33rd comment
Total: 47, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »