|
|
Le Kilt
Lives in
Works as a
Searching for Light
Joined on
Mar 28, 2005
|
Great use of the lighting.
Pity the tip of the wing got cut, but so much detail, nice one.
One of my favourites, simple and well shot :-)
Great fucussing, well captured!
It may not be perfect, but it's a great shot.
You can play with cropping it etc, but the core is great, well captured!!!
My favourite, great shot !
xoio: Getting a bit tired of this .. more zoom! more zoom! FAD. Then dumbing down other fundamental features... if what 'motiv500' says is true ... "no raw," & only 200K screens & EVFs ... thats rubbish!
The Pro1, a 7 year old camera, had a screen and EVF that were 235K, it HAD RAW, & even had the extra quick info top LCD (something you only get on mid range SLRs now)
Seems that the user interfaces are becoming more & more retarded, as is image quality, in favour of faddy rubbish like GPS & 'baby mode'. - I suppose at least it still has an EVF. Something else that seems to be getting left off cameras these days.. In favour on waving them about in front of your face like an iphone! :-/
Wonder if we could put the Pro1's 1.5x TC on it with an adapter? That would give us a 1260mm f5.7 lens, awsome !!!
xoio: Getting a bit tired of this .. more zoom! more zoom! FAD. Then dumbing down other fundamental features... if what 'motiv500' says is true ... "no raw," & only 200K screens & EVFs ... thats rubbish!
The Pro1, a 7 year old camera, had a screen and EVF that were 235K, it HAD RAW, & even had the extra quick info top LCD (something you only get on mid range SLRs now)
Seems that the user interfaces are becoming more & more retarded, as is image quality, in favour of faddy rubbish like GPS & 'baby mode'. - I suppose at least it still has an EVF. Something else that seems to be getting left off cameras these days.. In favour on waving them about in front of your face like an iphone! :-/
Yes, the bridges and G series went downhill after the Pro1.
The G series have been slowly climbing back up and will get there if they put a good fast lens on them.
At least the bridge lenses have got wider (24mm). The 840mm must be fun if it handles well, here's hoping the stabiliser works well !!!
Right LX93 ;-)
Glad you and others got it!
Is this an aquarium shot rather than an open ocean one?
Lyle Aldridge: "... objects with wings are NOT allowed, as well as any kind of animal or human being (at least as the main subject)."
You didn't even have to show the full rules to see that. Did only half the entrants bother to read the rules at all? Just wondering.
A pity the challenge didn't inspire more entries, the "unidentified" bit must daunt too many. I confess I entered a pic without reading the rules correctly, so got DQ'd legitimately.
Hi Robert,
What is it you didn't understand about my entry ???
I'm curious, is this for fun, or you needing inspiration for work?
Sucheth: hi is it ok if i upload birds pic
Only of Blue-tits !
Thomasbd: I don't know what really are you meaning by "no whole flower". But I just submitted less then half of a flower this time!!!!!!! and you disqualified it!!!!!! I am so disappointed for that!!!!!! here still I can see many photos of full flowers in the gallery!!!!!.... and it pains me...... however I am never uploading any image for any competition hosted by again!!!!!!! have good time.........
One must follow the rules : No stigmas, no whole flowers, and "only pictures that half the doesnt have will be excepted"...
Seeing the entries 'excepted', I expect the host is very young.
I'll have to upload the whole flower so that the host understands that it was part of a flower !
...and I'll gobble you and that camera of yours !
Nice one.
...one of the longest shadows in the world.
Good one!
so none !
;)
under the late afternoon sun... :-)