Le Kilt

Le Kilt

Lives in France South-West, France
Works as a Searching for Light
Joined on Mar 28, 2005

Comments

Total: 490, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Mesa Arch Sunrise in the Holes in Nature challenge (1 comment in total)

Seems a little HDR over-processed, but a great pic !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:30 UTC as 1st comment
On The heart in the Holes in Nature challenge (1 comment in total)

Could do with a little extra width (not easy if you haven't the lens with you!) but a high class photo :-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:28 UTC as 1st comment
On Cenote Rays in the Holes in Nature challenge (2 comments in total)

Excellent !!!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:26 UTC as 1st comment
On Barracuda School in the Holes in Nature challenge (4 comments in total)

Very cool !
:-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:25 UTC as 1st comment
On A View Through The Arch in the Holes in Nature challenge (10 comments in total)

Watch out for the heavy HDR type processing, but great pic all the same :-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 21:21 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

Biowizard: "... located to the *left* of the lens mount. Also on the *left* is a full-sized HDMI ..."

That's a very "selfie" oriented decription! With the camera pointing at a subject other than oneself, I'd say those buttons and the data ports are on the RIGHT hand side of the camera! Just as I think of the shutter release on my DSLR as being on the right hand end of the top-plate!

Brian

EDIT: Indeed, as in your OM-D E-M10 review: "The camera's ports (a micro-HDMI socket and combined USB/AV output) move to the *right* flank" ... same (relative) location as those sockets on the Blackmagic!

Then again, when you're describing a pic just above the text, and it says "on the left ot the mount" which is staring you in the face, I'm sure not many struggled to follow the description ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2015 at 20:16 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Rutger Bus article (44 comments in total)
In reply to:

Le Kilt: Too many unatural colours, go easy on the PP.
Thanks for sharing, though.

Good point :-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2015 at 09:06 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Rutger Bus article (44 comments in total)

Too many unatural colours, go easy on the PP.
Thanks for sharing, though.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2015 at 01:31 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

grasscatcher: I have to wonder, with the improved processing speed of modern cameras (e.g. - 30fps @ 8mpxl), could systems be developed for focus bracketing, much like what is done for exposure bracketing? Thirty pics taken, each with focus pulled in a bit from the previous exposure, then a final processed pic with relatively infinite focus (algorithm could be developed to focus from, say, 30' to 3' based on x focal length, 50' to 5' for a longer focal length, etc. to more accurately capture moving subjects, plus a setting of 1' to infinity for landscape still photos...).

This would be a great boon for those of us who require maximum DoF for certain photographic applications.

Oh dear, you have struggled badly with anything ambiguous.
Never mind, don't answer the question if that makes you feel better.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 20:44 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

tulku: I'm a little bit over the narrow mindset that appears to be a common thread amongst antagonists of the Lytro or Lightfield technology. I keep reading comments that photographers know what they want in focus and it's just a camera for bad photographers and the resolution is too low.

You cannot really hide things in a lightfield image, so as a photographer you have to be aware of the entire image that is being created. It's not about missing a shot and focusing later, rather, it's about taking time to really compose an image that can be explored by the viewer. I would have thought this factor would be intriguing to many photographers.

As for resolution, maybe it's not up there yet, but then again it's not really an image style for printing. Last time I checked I could not interact with a printed image and change focal points, or move around within the image like I can with a Lytro image.

Anyway just some thoughts.

The "folder" is an album, as the line "This photo is in 1 album:" hints at! Difficult to grasp?

BTW I have made no changes to my gallery apart from loading a new image. It is one of my gallery on the DPR site, I hope you don't consider that as theft or fraud?

You're really struggling to understand a simple concept of a gallery with photos and albums. How on earth do all the simple users on DPR manage it???

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 19:50 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Everlast66: HowaboutRAW,
Correct me if I am wrong, but the purpose of this thread is to discuss the article or news above.

Out of the 400 comments in it, 250 are probably yours and every third or so is a personal accusation, attack, insult or ridicule. If you are older than 18 years, start acting more maturely, if less ask your parents for direction and advice.

This is totally getting out of hand.

Wrong again HowaboutBADFAITH, it produces one gallery, in which there are albums.
Such bad faith trying to worm your way out, shame on you.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 19:27 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Le Kilt,

It sure looks like fraud, or theft.

Particularly since you don't do any identifying of the pictures as by someone else.

My assumptions could be wrong, but you've offered no good explanation for posting other people's photos in your DPR gallery. There are two with names embedded. Those are different names. So at least one of those images is not yours.

What rubbish, pathetic, find a bit of courage and face up to your actions.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 19:22 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

tulku: I'm a little bit over the narrow mindset that appears to be a common thread amongst antagonists of the Lytro or Lightfield technology. I keep reading comments that photographers know what they want in focus and it's just a camera for bad photographers and the resolution is too low.

You cannot really hide things in a lightfield image, so as a photographer you have to be aware of the entire image that is being created. It's not about missing a shot and focusing later, rather, it's about taking time to really compose an image that can be explored by the viewer. I would have thought this factor would be intriguing to many photographers.

As for resolution, maybe it's not up there yet, but then again it's not really an image style for printing. Last time I checked I could not interact with a printed image and change focal points, or move around within the image like I can with a Lytro image.

Anyway just some thoughts.

HowaboutBADFAITH : Yet you the guy who tells people to check their facts before posting went and started a new thread at the top insinuating fraud or theft.
Shame on you.

http://g4.img-dpreview.com/A5DBB56B383E4BA492A3F3DFFD7BF895.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 17:34 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Le Kilt,

It sure looks like fraud, or theft.

Particularly since you don't do any identifying of the pictures as by someone else.

My assumptions could be wrong, but you've offered no good explanation for posting other people's photos in your DPR gallery. There are two with names embedded. Those are different names. So at least one of those images is not yours.

So with ambiguity you don't check, you start a new thread at the top so that more people will see it, and insinuate fraud or theft.

You were out of order, and now you're clutching at straws trying to justify your behaviour.

At least have the courage to apologise...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 17:19 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Everlast66: HowaboutRAW,
Correct me if I am wrong, but the purpose of this thread is to discuss the article or news above.

Out of the 400 comments in it, 250 are probably yours and every third or so is a personal accusation, attack, insult or ridicule. If you are older than 18 years, start acting more maturely, if less ask your parents for direction and advice.

This is totally getting out of hand.

Except that I made no inaccurate claims about my gallery.
You keep talking about filters, folders, subdivisions to avoid admitting there are just albums that are simple and straightforward, that even an idiot would comprehend. You still don't?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 17:15 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

tulku: I'm a little bit over the narrow mindset that appears to be a common thread amongst antagonists of the Lytro or Lightfield technology. I keep reading comments that photographers know what they want in focus and it's just a camera for bad photographers and the resolution is too low.

You cannot really hide things in a lightfield image, so as a photographer you have to be aware of the entire image that is being created. It's not about missing a shot and focusing later, rather, it's about taking time to really compose an image that can be explored by the viewer. I would have thought this factor would be intriguing to many photographers.

As for resolution, maybe it's not up there yet, but then again it's not really an image style for printing. Last time I checked I could not interact with a printed image and change focal points, or move around within the image like I can with a Lytro image.

Anyway just some thoughts.

So you click on a photo, and immediately beneath it it says:
This photo is in 1 album: Other members - adjustments

Now that's too complex for you to understand?

I can put anything I like in my gallery, as long as the owners are ok with it and I don't label other people's work as mine.

You have no idea, yet insinuated fraud or theft.

Shame on you, little man hiding behind his screen not sharing anything. Try sharing, it would do you some good.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 10:54 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Le Kilt,

It sure looks like fraud, or theft.

Particularly since you don't do any identifying of the pictures as by someone else.

My assumptions could be wrong, but you've offered no good explanation for posting other people's photos in your DPR gallery. There are two with names embedded. Those are different names. So at least one of those images is not yours.

HowaboutBADFAITH, you went looking for muck and found none, now you're clutching at straws.

You keep telling others to check their facts and you don't, what hypocrisy.
Don't you realise that you can put anything you like in your gallery, it doesn't matter who it belongs to as long as they're ok with it and you don't claim them as yours. If you shared more your might know that.
I took the trouble to put them in a separate album, but i needn't have done so, as long as I don't say they're mine. Grow up, little man hiding behind his screen and sharing nothing.
Shame on you.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 10:44 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

Everlast66: HowaboutRAW,
Correct me if I am wrong, but the purpose of this thread is to discuss the article or news above.

Out of the 400 comments in it, 250 are probably yours and every third or so is a personal accusation, attack, insult or ridicule. If you are older than 18 years, start acting more maturely, if less ask your parents for direction and advice.

This is totally getting out of hand.

What hypocrisy.
I checked and found out exactly what you were seeing.
We've told you to click on the obvious link "View more photos in your gallery" that stares you in the face and you make excuses not to do so. One click! Do you need a screen capture to show you the obvious?
Anyway, when you view the photo, it says just beneath it :
This photo is in 1 album: Other members - adjustments
Is that not clear enough for you? Really?
Checking facts is not your strong point.
Insinuating fraud or theft without asking or checking is.

Shame on you.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 02:12 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

tulku: I'm a little bit over the narrow mindset that appears to be a common thread amongst antagonists of the Lytro or Lightfield technology. I keep reading comments that photographers know what they want in focus and it's just a camera for bad photographers and the resolution is too low.

You cannot really hide things in a lightfield image, so as a photographer you have to be aware of the entire image that is being created. It's not about missing a shot and focusing later, rather, it's about taking time to really compose an image that can be explored by the viewer. I would have thought this factor would be intriguing to many photographers.

As for resolution, maybe it's not up there yet, but then again it's not really an image style for printing. Last time I checked I could not interact with a printed image and change focal points, or move around within the image like I can with a Lytro image.

Anyway just some thoughts.

And from there you're not able to see the link "View more photos in your gallery" above all the pics?
LOL!
If you're not blind, stupid or lying, you have a more serious problem.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 01:59 UTC
On Lytro sheds jobs as it shifts focus to video article (506 comments in total)
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Le Kilt,

It sure looks like fraud, or theft.

Particularly since you don't do any identifying of the pictures as by someone else.

My assumptions could be wrong, but you've offered no good explanation for posting other people's photos in your DPR gallery. There are two with names embedded. Those are different names. So at least one of those images is not yours.

You're not capable of two obvious clicks when you go on about checking facts?
Man up, have a bit of courage, you insinuated fraud or theft and got it wrong.
Shame on you.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2015 at 01:54 UTC
Total: 490, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »