Mescalamba: Wonder why they think Sony users wouldnt like to have VC as option.. Sure in 24-70 difference between stabilised sensor vs lens isnt big, still for movies its nice option..
yes, price is sometimes even higher without OS/IS/VC so i dont get it why it should be without for sony.
And until now i wasnt able to get SteadyShot working in the View finder, it only affects if you take the photo or the movie so it would help a lot with manual focusing.
Also the objective IS is specialised for the focal length. Sony tells you can have 4,5 more aperture with steady shot, sigma with the 18-250 tells maximum 3
my sigma 18-250 have the better IS then the in-body steady shot (it least in my Sony A77)
Lol Canon told something about 75% less noise? A bad joke
really guys, 3500 € for a "slightly improvement"? A slightly improvement is a free firmware upgrade but not a new camera for 3500 €
The Nikon noises the same, have 36MP and cost less xD that is just bad at all..
The SP Lenses of Tamron (according to DxO (for sure both tested on the same body)) are the same quality than the L-Lenses of canon (1-3% tolerance, but cost only a 1/3 or even a 1/4.
This is a SP Lense too so i hope to see Canons ass kicked (they create awesome cameras for an awesome price but the L-Lenses are just exorbitant expensive)
Too sad that Tamron only have a handfull of lenses and only some of them are SP, but in the end, im lucky about one more =)