RStyga

RStyga

Joined on Nov 8, 2010

Comments

Total: 830, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (367 comments in total)
In reply to:

Raist3d: if fuji makes more small primes i may go back to them

18/2, 27/2.8, 35/2 (and fairly compact are 35/1.4, 60/2.4); how many more do you need??

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 04:04 UTC
On article Going Pro: We interview Fujifilm execs in Tokyo (367 comments in total)

X-A1/2's target group is girls? Well, if that makes Fujifilm dollar-happy so be it, as long they keep making Bayer-type sensor DSLM cameras!

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 04:03 UTC as 74th comment

When you spend $3K and, still, you get a mere 15m water proofing you know you got a Leica. They're hopeless...

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 03:31 UTC as 55th comment | 4 replies

I'd love to see a new Fujifilm with a 24MP non-Trans sensor and an EVF. A lot of people would, I suspect. X-A1 and 2 are superb little cameras.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 13:40 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

photogeek: I sense a disturbance in the force. It's like hundreds of thousands of lawyers' wallets cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

At these prices they HAVE TO be of superb quality.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 13:13 UTC
In reply to:

photogeek: I sense a disturbance in the force. It's like hundreds of thousands of lawyers' wallets cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

SOMEONE is buying these 'worth-buying' Leica gear all these years, though...

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 03:15 UTC

How's Leica manufactured such a provocatively expensive camera but has no shame crippling it with such an issue (i.e., blurred low-speed IQ)? Ahhh, the 'wonders' of digital Leica...

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 23:20 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply

Ahhh, those were the prices...

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2016 at 23:12 UTC as 11th comment
On article Hands-on with the Nikon D5 (409 comments in total)

You mean *very strong* hands-on (pun intended)...

Link | Posted on Jan 13, 2016 at 10:52 UTC as 39th comment
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (550 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: What's 3.28m ISO? Could we have a photo taken at this setting, and how low the light must be and the shutter speed fast enough to allow photos to be taken at such sensitivity? Is this a marketing BS or a typo?

@ Arkienkeli
You're off-topic, anally retentive and your behaviour is perhaps borderline troll-like. I've got a few scientific degrees but I'm not feeling arrogant enough to prevent myself from being casual in everyday communication. However, for your information, SI is not the ultimate standard across all scientific disciplines and scientific communication. 'Million' can be very well expressed with a lower 'm' and it is acceptable (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Million), especially if it's not used in a certain type of strict scientific context or a research paper. So take a chill pill and stick to the topic...

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 10:35 UTC
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1175 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: I hope the next model (D510) will address the apparent issue of small body and weight of D500; we need at least a 40% larger body and 1Kg weight to be ergonomic enough for pros and pro amateurs otherwise why bother with this "small" and "compact" camera?

Nikon fridges...

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 07:54 UTC
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (550 comments in total)

What's 3.28m ISO? Could we have a photo taken at this setting, and how low the light must be and the shutter speed fast enough to allow photos to be taken at such sensitivity? Is this a marketing BS or a typo?

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 01:41 UTC as 59th comment | 12 replies
On article Here at last: Nikon announces D500 (1175 comments in total)

I hope the next model (D510) will address the apparent issue of small body and weight of D500; we need at least a 40% larger body and 1Kg weight to be ergonomic enough for pros and pro amateurs otherwise why bother with this "small" and "compact" camera?

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 01:36 UTC as 168th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: The Camera Store TV awarded Leica SL the #2 worst camera of the year. Well done Leica... you deserve it.
https://youtu.be/Mexs7HvHR2I?t=23m40s

No substitute for bias....

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2016 at 15:21 UTC
In reply to:

RStyga: The Camera Store TV awarded Leica SL the #2 worst camera of the year. Well done Leica... you deserve it.
https://youtu.be/Mexs7HvHR2I?t=23m40s

Keep worshiping...

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2015 at 02:39 UTC
On article Field Test: Brad Puet and the Fujifilm X-T10 (120 comments in total)

Good video. Great reminder that MP is not an important factor in digital photography once a minimum MP threshold is reached; 16MP is plenty.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2015 at 11:42 UTC as 53rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: The Camera Store TV awarded Leica SL the #2 worst camera of the year. Well done Leica... you deserve it.
https://youtu.be/Mexs7HvHR2I?t=23m40s

You Leica fanatics are entertaining. Everyone who opposes digital Leica's clumsiness and lack of know how is summarily dismissed as "stupid Leica bashing". TCS TV is one of the most comprehensive and reliable reviewers of photographic gear on Youtube, not that you know or admit...

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2015 at 11:33 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1509 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: I saw up close in the flesh this 'thing' today... Man, this is one piece of ugly "huge-ness"... you just try to mount a tiny M lens on it and it'll look like a mega-truck fitted with wheels from a toy car; utterly unbalanced, utterly ridiculous. No wonder The Camera Store TV awarded yesterday SL the #2 worst camera of the year...

Whatever makes you happy...

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2015 at 13:21 UTC
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1509 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: I saw up close in the flesh this 'thing' today... Man, this is one piece of ugly "huge-ness"... you just try to mount a tiny M lens on it and it'll look like a mega-truck fitted with wheels from a toy car; utterly unbalanced, utterly ridiculous. No wonder The Camera Store TV awarded yesterday SL the #2 worst camera of the year...

Your link is very poor as an argument - your Leica blinkers made you miss the part that I actually saw the camera up close and the Canon bodies in the store... (not to mention that SL's sensor is half the resolution of the 5DSR).

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2015 at 23:50 UTC
In reply to:

love_them_all: Leica, bring back the film advance lever on your digital cameras :)

Don't give them ideas for the next 'special edition'... you'll be surprised..

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2015 at 12:56 UTC
Total: 830, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »