RStyga

RStyga

Joined on Nov 8, 2010

Comments

Total: 832, showing: 221 – 240
« First‹ Previous1011121314Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS Rebel T6i Review (311 comments in total)

Since there are people that pay many thousands to buy primitive cameras like Leica's and still be happy, this one is certainly not bad at all in a general sense: it has more than enough controls and a more than decent sensor to enable any photographer who knows how to take a photo to be merry.

Link | Posted on Jun 23, 2015 at 23:19 UTC as 59th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: Leica's new fixed lens camera is too bulky and too expensive, and no EVF of FF sensor will compensate for it. An A7II would be a more prudent choice. But Leica's target group of victims is immune to these arguments so happy ending for all..

Exactly "pretty decent price for a Leica", not for a camera.
As for size I'd prefer an RX1:
http://camerasize.com/compact/#389.270,625,468,ha,t

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2015 at 21:07 UTC

Impressive. However, I can't help thinking what a successor to 17-35/2.8-4, a superb all-round performer, would have been, that is, retianing the lightweight and small size! I understand this is a constant max F2 but size does matter.

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 16:14 UTC as 62nd comment
On article Video Overview: Leica Q (149 comments in total)
In reply to:

dcolak: Is it just me or that leica red logo is a bit crooked?

Maybe the whole camera is crooked... no this, no that... and Leica followers like it. Everybody's happy.

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2015 at 12:24 UTC
On article Canon EOS Rebel T6s Review (474 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: Does it have AF MICROADJUSTMENT?

Just now, I had a very quick read and found out that it does not have this feature A quick Y/N it would have saved me the time to read a page or more. Anyway, thanks for responding.
Without AF microadjust it's pretty useless in non-LV PDAF mode with any lens with a large aperture. It's a really bad decision by Canon's marketing dept to intentionally cripple most models like that, especially since DSLMs dominate the market with a highly accurate AF system by design.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2015 at 15:00 UTC
On article Canon EOS Rebel T6s Review (474 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: Does it have AF MICROADJUSTMENT?

No, Richard, I haven't. I only had a quick look at the specs and intro summary text. I noticed that it had both LV using sensor PDAF and the conventional non-LV PDAF.

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2015 at 14:53 UTC
On article Canon EOS Rebel T6s Review (474 comments in total)

Does it have AF MICROADJUSTMENT?

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 22:02 UTC as 86th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: Leica's new fixed lens camera is too bulky and too expensive, and no EVF of FF sensor will compensate for it. An A7II would be a more prudent choice. But Leica's target group of victims is immune to these arguments so happy ending for all..

Sorry, and you are... Troll No...?

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 17:57 UTC
In reply to:

RStyga: Leica's new fixed lens camera is too bulky and too expensive, and no EVF of FF sensor will compensate for it. An A7II would be a more prudent choice. But Leica's target group of victims is immune to these arguments so happy ending for all..

Aren't we all...

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2015 at 09:56 UTC

Leica's new fixed lens camera is too bulky and too expensive, and no EVF of FF sensor will compensate for it. An A7II would be a more prudent choice. But Leica's target group of victims is immune to these arguments so happy ending for all..

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 15:09 UTC as 8th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: If would be an interesting camera for $3000, which is much closer to its actual value, but Leica does not do $3000...

Goodnight

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 15:53 UTC
In reply to:

RStyga: If would be an interesting camera for $3000, which is much closer to its actual value, but Leica does not do $3000...

Competition...

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 11:59 UTC

If would be an interesting camera for $3000, which is much closer to its actual value, but Leica does not do $3000...

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2015 at 15:02 UTC as 9th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: Sigma manufactures in Japan, and still offer extremely low prices. Leica is a "tad bit" overpriced...

Sigma's current product line is of very high optical and high manufacturing quality, technologically advanced, have extremely competitive prices and made in Japan. Take the AF 18-35 / 1.8 for example. Leica digital cameras are as durable as the electronics inside them, so your point is very weak.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 11:27 UTC
In reply to:

RStyga: Sigma manufactures in Japan, and still offer extremely low prices. Leica is a "tad bit" overpriced...

You're poorly informed...

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 11:11 UTC

Sigma manufactures in Japan, and still offer extremely low prices. Leica is a "tad bit" overpriced...

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 22:05 UTC as 31st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: Worst-design camera record.

No. Hasselblad Lunar sure is ugly but still ergonomic. This Sigma is completely counter-everything in terms of design.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 06:53 UTC

Worst-design camera record.

Link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 07:05 UTC as 30th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

RStyga: With the rate Leica is releasing special editions and special purpose cameras, instead of fixing the quirks and functional crippling of their existing models, it would not be far from truth to consider all Leica camera models as special edition or, perhaps, special-need, cameras: they lack this, they lack that, they are digital but don't expect up to date digital technology, made out of that worship-inducing material, and, funny enough, costing more than several good digital cameras together... surely, they are special edition/special need cameras. Ah, but the Monochrome uses all pixels for image capturing, earth-shuttering technology! Let's have a new religious Leica movement out of this "concept" and throw to the fire all who dare to oppose buying this and opt for an actual modern digital camera.

Leica fluff...

I didn't say it is.

What's crippling it is obvious.

Sensor cost does not account for the "Leica" camera price.

It is for me, for the right price, only.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2015 at 23:40 UTC

With the rate Leica is releasing special editions and special purpose cameras, instead of fixing the quirks and functional crippling of their existing models, it would not be far from truth to consider all Leica camera models as special edition or, perhaps, special-need, cameras: they lack this, they lack that, they are digital but don't expect up to date digital technology, made out of that worship-inducing material, and, funny enough, costing more than several good digital cameras together... surely, they are special edition/special need cameras. Ah, but the Monochrome uses all pixels for image capturing, earth-shuttering technology! Let's have a new religious Leica movement out of this "concept" and throw to the fire all who dare to oppose buying this and opt for an actual modern digital camera.

Leica fluff...

Link | Posted on May 14, 2015 at 03:04 UTC as 6th comment | 3 replies
Total: 832, showing: 221 – 240
« First‹ Previous1011121314Next ›Last »